StnCld316

The guy lived a good life. May he rest in peace courtesy of the Taxpayer.

Not to many follow this couple very much.

Sexy Guest Sleeping (Attachment Purged)

In the US, we have what is called "The Fair Use Doctrine," in which you can cite short snippets of works from others to help express an idea or concept. It's necessary to ensure freedom of speech, especially that of a political nature. We have this ability in the US (not granted by a government -- it's that exceptionalist thing educated people understand and that everyone thinks is evil), and it's necessary. However, it doesn't necessarily apply to borrowing large works of others engaged in personal or commercial work (it's that legal thing that makes lawyers make a living.) However, RLC is a public entity, worthy of comment, so I think they allow some "Fair Use" to rule: as long as it's controlled and people are not just ripping them off. CC does work as advertising and the fact that publication of pictures on CC lasts is because we have a paying membership base and it excludes the massive rip-off sites from stealing the pictures that we have "borrowed" from RLC to illustrate our comments. That's just a fricking guess, of course. Sounds logical. In Canada we don't have that. We are free to download, post, upload which is not against our laws for now. They have been working to get that changed but the SCC keeps striking them down. It's all fine here as long as you don't sell what's downloaded or uploaded for monetary gain. I imagine sometime in the not so distant future that will change. Wouldn't the answer be to upload pics and vids to hosting sites owned by Canadians in a Canadian domain then? I guess if it's a free site, not one of those pay to download-at-a-decent-speed-ones, then it should be ok right? Right. I have never really looked to see what sites I have used in the past are Canadian or not. I just used them because they worked for the time being. I'll have a scout around tomorrow on the net and see if I can find some reliable Canadian servers.

Nice. That's better PhotoShopping than what I had. Your the man Sanper. Did you use Photoshop or something else. No utilizo Photoshop amigo StnCld316, uso Photofiltre que es menos pesado aunque con menos funciones que Photoshop. Web: http://www.photofiltre.com/ SALUDOS. Thank You my friend. I'll download their free version and check it out. If I need the more advanced version I can always get it through BitTorrent. La versión gratuita no te permite tener capas, busca una versión Full... SALUDOS. Thanks. I'll download the full version through BitTorrent first thing when I get up from my beauty sleep.

Nice. That's better PhotoShopping than what I had. Your the man Sanper. Did you use Photoshop or something else. No utilizo Photoshop amigo StnCld316, uso Photofiltre que es menos pesado aunque con menos funciones que Photoshop. Web: http://www.photofiltre.com/ SALUDOS. Thank You my friend. I'll download their free version and check it out. If I need the more advanced version I can always get it through BitTorrent.

In the US, we have what is called "The Fair Use Doctrine," in which you can cite short snippets of works from others to help express an idea or concept. It's necessary to ensure freedom of speech, especially that of a political nature. We have this ability in the US (not granted by a government -- it's that exceptionalist thing educated people understand and that everyone thinks is evil), and it's necessary. However, it doesn't necessarily apply to borrowing large works of others engaged in personal or commercial work (it's that legal thing that makes lawyers make a living.) However, RLC is a public entity, worthy of comment, so I think they allow some "Fair Use" to rule: as long as it's controlled and people are not just ripping them off. CC does work as advertising and the fact that publication of pictures on CC lasts is because we have a paying membership base and it excludes the massive rip-off sites from stealing the pictures that we have "borrowed" from RLC to illustrate our comments. That's just a fricking guess, of course. Sounds logical. In Canada we don't have that. We are free to download, post, upload which is not against our laws for now. They have been working to get that changed but the SCC keeps striking them down. It's all fine here as long as you don't sell what's downloaded or uploaded for monetary gain. I imagine sometime in the not so distant future that will change.

Nice. That's better PhotoShopping than what I had. Your the man Sanper. Did you use Photoshop or something else.

Bedroom Sex 34931_180a8ccf8a68d9ef2dc0434a8f9ba3130b2aefcf.mp4

I guess I better go and check it out. Last time I looked to guys were sittinf naked at the tale drinking checking each others dicks out. If anything interesting I'll record and post.

From the time I joined CC and to this very day every pic and vid that has been uploaded to the attachment center still stand and no content has been removed except if the user that puts it there decides to delete it.

To what I have seen so far the only getting the ban from RLC are the ones that are using Third Party uploading. If they use the attachments and other options below the message box RLC cannot access that part unless they join CC and pay the $12 to see this. I have been on CC for about 18 months and to this day all the pics and videos that are in the attachment center are still there and readily available. The only one that I have seen where the pics are still available from a Third Party Uploading service are the ones that use http://www.subirimagenes.net. That server seems to be somewhere that's out of RLC's reach. I really don't see why RLC gets their shit in a knot over a few pics and vids. It's free advertising for them. No one is actually selling what they copy for money, so really there is no infringement on any copyright.

Keeping a good eye on her.

Quite a bit overboard on the tats. I guess she has to keep up her Goth image. [/quote I guess SC,but with all the Tats and having all those guy's doing what they are doing...i know what kind of image she is sending to me. I haven't figured those type of girls out yet. Why would a nice looking girl destroy a body.

Good Luck.

Quite a bit overboard on the tats. I guess she has to keep up her Goth image.

Shouldn't be scared. She has already exposed her full body for all to see already.

We know. StnCld316 already told us. http://camcaps.net/video-links/new-videos-site/msg109065/#msg109065 Admin has made a new thread specifically for this site http://camcaps.net/live-voyeur-style-cam-sites/httpwww-lamaisondusexe-fr-5473/msg109216/#msg109216

wouldn't it be nice to see smt in this ass ;D (The Image associated with this comment is no longer accessible and has been removed). Get that picture any bigger. My monitors not big enough. LOL

She has done that. It's just been under the covers and in a tub full of bubble bath preventing anything from been seen except for her facial expressions from her moment of bliss.

Suspended Account. RLC bit your ass quick.

LOL Account has been suspended.

This girl must be in her glory with all 3 guys. Last night she was banging on carrying on with a bald headed dude. The guy playing with her ass was tending to a woodstove for heat and the other was under a blanket cuffing his carrot. After that they went to bed and the girl does not let go of you carrot wanted to third-round son colegas que se lo pasan bien Be interesting to see who takes her tonight. Not a bad looking girl, she just has a lot of tats on her body.

Maybe because they made it a Federal Case and not a State one.