Amy3

Oh, and then there's that. #nomanagers

For sure they do! Many of them start out fairly normal and then the money starts to drop and then decisions have to be made about what to do. Some will progress and others will not. Sometimes one will and the other won't. VHTV is a gauntlet, but many of them don't realize it right away. I think they are more naive then you think they are.

But not all of them are here to progress into swinging either.

Then she'll have to live with herself knowing that she chose money over her boyfriend. But that's her call to make.

I can understand that and to some extent you're right. For many this is money grab for as long as it can be had. BUT, not everyone here has that same priority and not everyone is willing to go all the way.

Cause he's in a relationship with Kate? Maybe he is right and it's a mistake to ruin their relationship for the money. But, if it's for fun and he wants it to then a worthy adventure.

For sure, but she had no interest in swinging with another guy. Sex to her was and is always with Jeff. Jeff worships the ground she walks on always. He only ever needed her. None of their problems involved a disagreement over whether or not to progress into swinging.

The real question is, does Kate want to progress because of the money or because she wants to have fun. If it's the former, then I can understand Andrew's hesitation.

Neither Violet, nor Jeff wanted to move into swinging. Bad comparison!

Did her little problem area resolve?

Poor girl! I hate seeing people crying here because I don't know why they are doing it and so I don't know how I'm supposed to feel about it.

That's good to hear. Maybe just some bad news or something.

Any update?

Oh Waldi, you made my day! 🙂

I've seen much worse. It's when the angle goes over center that it becomes unbearable. They can completely get rid of the cams as far as I'm concerned.

X2! Viewers expect close ups. There has to be a cam near the couch for them. Has to be!

Is it legal to broadcast someone onto the internet through one's webcam without their explicit consent? I have to wonder if our little friend here fully understands that he is being broadcasted across the internet while he is scoping out a girl camming herself. Have to wonder if VHTV is keeping legal things like this in check. They probably figure it doesn't matter. 🤔

What's going on here?

@StnCld316 offline

@StnCld316 offline

Just don't watch then, but also don't take away something someone else might enjoy just cause it's not what you like.

That's not fair Golfer. That is not what I said at all. The question is whether or not Jeka's do nothing apts are worthy of of VHTV. My answer is that anyone who is on VHTV is worthy as long as they are getting what they want out of it. Also, my drive for realistic voyeurism does not mean that I want to see people sitting around not doing nothing. I've explained this over and over again. I expect tenants living in a voyeur house to mostly live their real "interesting" lives and not some pretend, rigged, life mostly designed to gets views. I call that cheating. If I wanted to see acting, rigged cam shows, paid performers, there's plenty of other places for that and #free! But, it's no one's place to demand that VHTV remove any tenants cause no one has any idea how successful they are. Only VHTV and the managers know that. It's up to the tenant or manager to decide if they aren't making enough to stay. VHTV doesn't kick people out because of low views and when I voted yes above, that's the reason why.

Just looking at them without clicking on them they look the same. Neither have as much contrast and clarity as jj's. But his are much larger files.

Well, I guess his is a full image and yours is compressed.

Why is jj's pic so much better then yours @Sparkles? No offense, just curious why it is. 🤔