JoJoGunne

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgQOJNnVeUg

And then we have this...from Sweden.

More Muslim integration in the EU...this time in France. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOdBLK7A3MM

Of course, the US isn't immune to this same sort of Muslim integration into our society.

Does the EU want more of this? You know...all these Muslims who just want to integrate and become a part of the EU?

I have some questions about the circumstances surrounding this video, but it does illustrate some of the problems the EU is in for if they continue to allow a large influx of refugees. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dOtmQhFb7U

LOL!! No. I won't write instructions that were more effectively shown in a video. "A picture is worth a thousand words", so that video is worth a book. You are NOT getting a book from me. You asked for help...I gave it. "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink".

This is how you do it. Easy-peasy. Yes...there is a much easier way to deal with a quote than your method. Watch this video to find out how. https://dirtybin.com/675

Ummm...okay...to reduce your wordy post to its essential points, this is what you are saying: 1. You refuse to consider facts and quotes because you don't like the messenger. shrug... Of course, you have a right, in my opinion, to make such a choice...just as I have a right to perceive that as a weakness on your part. 2. You either don't want to back up your contentions about what the Geneva Conventions actually says...or you can't. Well, that's unfortunate, but it's not my problem. Until you DO back yourself up, you will be subject to doubt on my part. btw...since you are stating that you are not going to quote me when you respond to my posts, I'll state that I won't respond to you unless you mention my name in your posts. After all, how else am I to know for a fact that you are talking to me?

While I'll continue to quote your words, I'll take the action of deleting any of your words that I don't feel inclined to address. Actually, the massive surge in refugees that Europe is struggling to cope with is not because of ISIS...it's because refugees who are already in other countries are not happy with their lot in those countries and they are trying to get to better countries. I hope you get a good night's rest because, if you want to support your contentions regarding the Geneva Conventions, you are going to have to do your own homework. I'm not going to do it for you. Facts are facts...quotes are quotes. Regardless your opinion of a particular newspaper you'll need to actually dispute the facts and quotes themselves...if you can.

shrug... You are the one who places blame for events in Syria on things that Europeans and Americans did decades ago. Don't get upset and defensive when I point out what the real causes of Syria's problems...such as their own civil war. You are the one who place the blame for Syria's situation on people who are dead...the Austro-Hungarian Empire. That's why I presented my slave reparation analogy. btw, I'm beginning to think you are a conspiracy nut when you start talking about "war for profit". Again, you were the one who placed the blame for Syria's situation on all kinds of things...but didn't see fit to mention the primary cause: The Arab Spring. And I said nothing about us bearing responsibility for the Arab Spring. Your strawman is irrelevant. In regard to Ozi's post from a month ago, I see no reason for you to bring it up...especially if you aren't going to refer to it. If it's important to you, link it. If it's not important to you, then don't bother to mention it. In any case, whatever Ozi said in his post is his words and opinions. I'm not concerned with it. LOL!! Okay...fair enough. You should know that "irony" doesn't come through well in text. If you meant "triumphs" as an ironic turn of phrase, you probably should have done something to make that clear. Quotes would have helped. shrug... You are the one citing Geneva Convention rules that state that refugees can continue to use that status to move from country to country for reasons other than what caused them to become refugees in the first place. I'm not familiar with all the rules, so I have to bow to your expertise...even if I suspect you might be wrong about those rules. Well, you are to be commended for whatever efforts you make and, believe me, I don't really care to know what you are doing. I would suggest, though, that you also take a very careful look at the possible results of your EU taking in hundreds of thousands of refugees. Once again...you are the one who brought up WWIII...not me. It's not something that's bugging me. Maybe it's something YOU might be more inclined to start a thread about, eh? Oh...here we go: When you don't want to...or, more likely can't...address the facts, quotes and data, it's always best to bad-mouth the messenger...in this case, the Daily Mail. Really...that's a more disingenuous tactic than raising strawmen.

Syria has never been an oil powerhouse and most certainly, in the last ten years or so, they have become more and more an oil importer than an oil exporter. In any case, saying we bear responsibility for their civil was is akin to saying current-day Americans owe reparations to descendants of slaves. Nothing but a ridiculous notion. Whoa, there...before you make a fool of yourself, you should be aware that ISIS have yet to "triumph" anywhere. I'll agree that the US, to a certain extent bears responsibility for the current conditions in Iraq, though I wouldn't put it all on Bush and Blair. Obama certainly screwed things up due to his inaction, the EU...including the UK...abandoned Iraq early on and Iraq, themselves, let their own people down. But all that really has little to do with the Syrian people fleeing their homes. That is due more to Syria's own civil war. You know...Syrians fighting Syrians. That civil war is an outcome of the so-called "Arab Spring". Neither the US nor the EU created that. LOL!! I'll admit I'm not an expert on the Geneva Conventions, as you imply that you are, but your contention that they can...or should be able to...take advantage of their "refugee status" forever until they find some country in which they can make the biggest buck...or get the most social benefits...is ludicrous. If you are worried about the next world war, do something about it...before it happens...instead of crying about what your choices will be after it happens. But don't worry too much. You can be sure that the US will come and help you...we always have. Even when you take us for granted. edit: I just read an article that shows that the leadership in the EU is now realizing just what they are getting into...especially since the bulk of these "refugees" are not refugees at all. They are also deciding that they just cannot afford to absorb the hundreds of thousands swarming in. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3240010/Number-refugees-arriving-Europe-soars-85-year-just-one-five-war-torn-Syria.html

So...you agree that they are not "refugees" escaping the horrors of war in their native country...Syria...but, rather, are people escaping an untenable financial situation in Turkey for a more lucrative situation in the EU...right? That was what I was trying to say in point #3 in my post and the link I provided bears that out. btw, who...exactly...are you talking about when you say that "...we caused the situation..."? The EU? The US? Turkey? The Syrians, themselves?

Are you saying they face death while in Turkey? I haven't heard any such thing. Here is the truth about why they are leaving Turkey to go to the EU: http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2015/09/17/441168633/for-syrian-migrants-many-reasons-to-leave-turkey-for-europe

The EU can do whatever they want...I don't really care. I mean, if they want the burden of tens of thousands of people straining their social and financial infrastructure...have at it. For the US, I don't think we should let any in our country...for the following reasons: 1. Security. I just don't trust that we can detect possible terrorists. 2. I'm sick and tired of people who have a hard time in their own country abandoning it, thinking they should be welcome in my country. Why would they care about my country if they don't care about their own? 3. I question whether they are really "refugees" from the civil unrest in Syria. Most of those going to the EU countries are not coming from Syria...they actually already left Syria and are coming from Turkey. They are trying to get to the EU because they'd rather live in a richer country. In my opinion, that makes them worse than our own illegal aliens because they are lying to get into the US.

Wow!! Now THIS is a spectre from the past. GeoCities used to be THE place to go when not on UseNet.

I think she looks old enough.

She looks like she wants "Roman Hands" and "Russian Fingers"...but she's not getting them. (For our non-American friends, that would translate to "Roaming Hands" and "Rushing Fingers".)

At one time I honestly felt it was worth my time and money, but there were a number of factors involved then that have changed. Now, I rarely even follow the threads here on CC that involve RLC. I've just gotten to the point where I don't care about RLC anymore.

I'm from God's Country...otherwise known as the Rocky Mountains. We don't NEED no stinkin' flag.

Sorry about you getting banned, but yeah...you violated your agreement with RLC and they are justified in revoking your account. I don't know...maybe you thought you'd be safe posting a picture, but you weren't. RLC employs a hidden watermark in their video feed that identifies the account of the person viewing it. When you got the screenshot and then posted it here, you screwed yourself.

I haven't watched any of the RLC cams in a long time, but I suspect they like to masturbate because their guys are 3-minute men and don't work to get them off. It reminds me of Mighty Mouse from way back in Elena and Artur's apartment. That girl would let her bf fuck her...he's get his rocks off...and then she'd push him out of the bathroom and use the shower head to get her an orgasm.

I'm not really interesting in your pissing and moaning about a site that nobody really cares about anymore or about what anybody did on that site back in the day, but I'm kind of curious why "bluto", a full member of CC has turned into "BLUTO", a newbie. Oh...wait...I know. BLUTO is a sock puppet. You are lucky CC has a minimum of rules. That kind of thing would get you booted from most forums.

All of the content...whether ww archive pics or the video feed...were dependent upon the quality of the member's camera equipment and their own internet connection. Some of them had good stuff...some of them had crappy stuff. For example, Ann's hula hoop stuff was, in my opinion, worthless to watch because her cam wasn't very high quality and her internet connection just plain sucked. Her cam feed was like watching stop-motion video. On the other hand, one of the last things I saw on ww was Caerwyn and Jeannie getting frisky on his couch when she visited him in Holland. His equipment was relatively good and the stuff I saw was definitely worthy of being recorded. Not to mention here were a mod and an ex-mod doing the nasty on a feed that was NOT child-safe. (I didn't see J hurrying to ban them for violating his "rules")