JoJoGunne

I didn't say a forum and a video game were the same. I guess you missed the point, which is to not judge a person's qualifications based on their age...but judge them on their actions and abilities. Now, you may think KITTEN doesn't have enough experience. Fine. Make your case based on HER actions and abilities...not on her age.

This question about some minimum age to be a mod brought an interesting anecdote to mind that might put this issue in perspective. First...a question. For those of you who play MMO's...particularly MMO's that have robust PvP and require teamwork of up to 100+ players...do you think there should be an age requirement for the leaders of the team? High teens? 20's? 30's? Here's the story: Back when Warhammer Online came out my son and I got into the game big time. Now I'm not the leader-type, but he is. We joined a guild together and I became a respected member of the guild. My son, however, became one of the officers because of his tactical abilities, being able to rapidly assess situations and make effective decisions. He also was a pretty nice guy. At the time, my son was 13 years old. Moral of the story: It's not your age that matters...it's what you bring to the game.

Oh...yeah...sorry, but I don't have anything on her.

Her?? Who??

What, in particular, are you looking for?

The guy who had their cams put out a notice that they were removing them from his site. He didn't know the exact reason, but speculated that they were getting hacked. I've seen marcetdodo's website. I don't know if they have it all up and running because they want people to pay. I haven't decided to pay yet...don't know if I ever will. If you want to see what their site is all about, here is the link: http://private.myddns.com/ From what I have been able to see, they don't have any naked pictures of their daughter, though they do have some that are kind of suggestive. I caution anyone who pays to see what else they have be careful about that. Paying for child porn can get you in a world of hurt.

Lesbians are people to...and like all other people, their sex lives are their own. The previous RLC lesbians were the polar opposite of this couple...they had sex almost every night. But it's no different with hetero couples. Take Artur and Elena, for example. He had sex quite often...she never had sex. She only played the part as his sperm bucket. Or their friends, Mighty Mouse and her boyfriend. He had sex with her often, but the only way she could cum was by using the shower spray in the bathtub. Every one of the couples that RLC has had have had different sex lives. Alina was so frustrated because she wasn't getting any...Anton, of course, would rather play computer games. But somehow they worked things out to the benefit of both...and they seem to be happy together. Nina and Kira are probably happy with their sex life, as well.

Can anyone tell me what this code does? <script type="text/javascript" src="http://mod.postimage.org/smf-english-hotlink-adult.js"'>http://mod.postimage.org/smf-english-hotlink-adult.js" charset="utf-8"></script> <script type="text/javascript"><!-- // --><![CDATA[ var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-30732855-2']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); In particular, I'm interested in this: http://mod.postimage.org/smf-english-hotlink-adult.js

I'm an old school RLC fan, so here are my two favorites: 1. Mighty Mouse masturbating in the bathtub. (Artur and Elena) 2. Any of the sex with the lesbians...Ana and Dana...but especially the double dildo action.

ww.com got sold. The old owner transfered everything to camarades.com. I don't know if that still works or not, but from what I heard last, the owner banned all nudity. It seems interest in the site dropped like a rock after that.

I didn't vote for any of the choices because I can guarantee that what he says most will be "I"...followed by "we"...by which he really means "I".

I don't think people are crying here...they are expressing opinions. That's what you do in a forum. Of course, you've expressed your opinion, too. I do find it ironic that you are complaining about member complaining. LOL!!

I know how irritating it is when the tenants deliberately block the cams. But you need to send a message to RLC when that happens. 1. Email them and tell them what's going on. I don't know for sure, but I really don't think anyone from RLC monitors those apartments 24/7. They might not be aware of it...especially if the tenants uncover the cams later. At least, by emailing RLC, you make them aware of the action. I'm pretty certain blocking cams is against their rules. 2. If this kind of thing happens a LOT, and RLC doesn't seem to be taking effective measures to prevent it, then it may be time to end your subscription...along with giving RLC a strongly worded message why. Money talks louder. For those who are paying...I hope RLC hears you and deals with this. You deserve to get what you are paying for.

Wait... Both you and your wife watch RLC and both of you post to CC...but you both use the same CC account. Do I understand that correctly? If so, I would like to suggest your wife create her own CC account. That would go a long way toward reducing confusion around here.

LOL!! I came at you because you created a dumbass poll and I'm not surprised that you don't care if I voted or not because it's obvious your whole thread was the result of your rage at pintrippy. I would suggest you work on that, though...rage can cause you to do and say even more dumbass, infantile stuff like your "mommy's basement" thing. I mean...I'm sure you could come up with some original, dumbass zinger if your mind wasn't clouded. Now...I'm done talking to you but I'm sure you'll want to get in some last dumbass remark, so go ahead...knock yourself out. ps: I'm almost tempted to apply for one of the open moderator positions just so I can properly spank your ass...almost. LOL!!

How about we ban you for posting a dumbass poll? After this latest bout of spam from pintrippy, I was about to vote in your poll to ban the guy...even though the link he gave is quite useful while it lasts. But you telling me to shut up made me decide NOT to vote in your dumbass poll. Instead of telling me to shut up, you would be better served by asking me why I think it's dumbass. That way, you'll learn something.

Yeah...that's the link you don't want to post here because the guy has suspected child porn on his site.

How about we ban you for posting a dumbass poll?

I don't know much about Google Drive. I suppose you could run your own test. Maybe use another computer, enter search details that pertain to your content...see if it comes up. On the other hand, is there some kind of security settings in Google Drive that would help?

I suspect someone is using Asian proxy servers to try to figure out your login details.

she has nice boobs ;D . Except she never let anyone see them.

I wouldn't read too much into RLC...all this stuff about "social experiment". I mean, I don't think there is someone back at RLC HQ collecting data for a sociology article. No...I think it's all about the money.

Jane has been on her cam in recent days. Here is a .zip file with three videos. Jane1 - Nothing to see, really, but toward the end she speaks to me on her cam. Jane2 - Jane teasing. Jane3 - I asked Jane to rub her pussy...so she did. https://www.dropbox.com/s/nmgbdjz8im0ac7h/Jane.zip?dl=0

Your links are useless. 1. I've seen a lot of videos of Ann. How can I possibly know if I've seen these videos before or not? 2. How do I even know if I'd be interested in seeing these videos? Example: I have no desire to watch Ann's hula hoop videos. How do I know every one of those links aren't for hula hoop videos? 3. You might get some good revenue from that ul.to place, but from my point of view, the way the place operates reduces, for me, the dubious value of any of your unknown content.

That's like saying, "If you like apples, you'll love oranges."