Jump to content
*** New Software Coming Soon! Please Check for Important Information in the Read Me Section ***

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Il me semble que la responsabilité revient à l'invité. Si est référencé VH, il faut le radier.

Lola et Otto ont déjà baisé avec des invités sans se cacher! 

Je suis également pour des amendes dans les appartements où il ne se passe rien pendant plus 48h!!!

Posted
1 minute ago, Coffee94 said:

Il me semble que la responsabilité revient à l'invité. Si est référencé VH, il faut le radier.

Lola et Otto ont déjà baisé avec des invités sans se cacher! 

Je suis également pour des amendes dans les appartements où il ne se passe rien pendant plus 48h!!!

The responsibility is ALWAYS from the tenants (except when they don't saw it). Here on this case it was the tenants that cover one cam.. and the other cam was with the agreement of the tenants.

They covered on purpose 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Sparkles said:

The responsibility is ALWAYS from the tenants (except when they don't saw it). Here on this case it was the tenants that cover one cam.. and the other cam was with the agreement of the tenants.

They covered on purpose 

Yes fine and next time kick out...

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, jabbath1987 said:

One of the biggest idiots I ever saw on the site...

It's not the guest's fault. It's the tenants for agreeing to cover them. It's always their responsibility.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, jabbath1987 said:

One of the biggest idiots I ever saw on the site...

do otto and lola have any blame?is all the idiots fail.?

Posted
Just now, jabbath1987 said:

Yes fine and next time kick out...

What will serve the fine if (imagine) the guest tell them that he will cover the fine?? 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...