Jump to content

Evie & Mike


Recommended Posts

Because they cam for a job while living on VHTV. You aren't their target audience. Personally, I don't think camstars belong on a voyeur site. I think it's moonlighting and double-dipping. I think VHTV should adopt a rule that says any camming to another cam site, such as Chaturbate, must be done in a room where there are only free cams; otherwise, it must be done in a room where there are no VHTV cams. That would solve the problem!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Amy3 said:

Because they cam for a job while living on VHTV. You aren't their target audience. Personally, I don't think camstars belong on a voyeur site. I think it's moonlighting and double-dipping. I think VHTV should adopt a rule that says any camming to another cam site, such as Chaturbate, must be done in a room where there are only free cams; otherwise, it must be done in a room where there are no VHTV cams. That would solve the problem!

that is an excellent idea. the point of vh showing the lives of the camstars was supposed to be to also show their lives while not camming. they don't have very much non-cam sex & it's a shame because they are really a hot couple.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Amy3 said:

Because they cam for a job while living on VHTV. You aren't their target audience. Personally, I don't think camstars belong on a voyeur site. I think it's moonlighting and double-dipping. I think VHTV should adopt a rule that says any camming to another cam site, such as Chaturbate, must be done in a room where there are only free cams; otherwise, it must be done in a room where there are no VHTV cams. That would solve the problem!

1

Amy, please don't misunderstand what I'm saying, here. It's not meant
to be harsh or mean. It's just another opinion, another view. I have a
couple of questions for you. Just some things to think about, to knaw
on, as the old saying goes.

You said your idea would, "...solve the problem." But what if, there is no
problem? What if, there's nothing to solve? Obviously, VH condones
camming on their site or it wouldn't be allowed. And, there's probably
nothing that the opponents of camming can do to change that, unless
VH happens to change their mind, which doesn't seem very likely, at
the moment.

Also, it's obviously a part of some tenants lives, which makes it real life
for them. We have no right to tell or even suggest what tenants should
or shouldn't do or how or when they should do it. You've said that
yourself. So, shouldn't we just let them live the life they choose to live?

It's been said many times in these topics: If a tenant does something
that you don't care to see, just don't watch them, don't follow their CC
topic. And, if you choose to do so anyway, at the very least don't
complain about what you don't like over and over and over. I don't
think there's a day, while reading VH topics, that at least one person
doesn't complain about a tenant camming.

Here's another couple of questions. At some point, anytime in your
life, have you never had more than one job at the same time? Has
there never been a time in your life when you've needed some extra
cash? You've said more than a couple of times that tenants don't
always get paid fairly. Maybe, living their lives in a great big fishbowl
24/7 doesn't pay very well. This couple really likes camming and it
must be lucrative for them or they probably wouldn't do it. Shouldn't
we allow them to do as they like, to live the life they choose?

Oxford says voyeurism is the practice of gaining sexual pleasure
from watching others when they are naked or engaged in sexual
activity.
It makes no distinction as to how they get that way. We're
watching them get naked and have sex. According to Oxford,
that's voyeurism.
❤️

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...