B2 Girls on Vacation - General Topic May #2

[SierraTM]

il y a 27 minutes, Fagen a dit :

You have 26 other apts. to choose from so im sure you will find something you like 😉

Let me give you an example.

Lets say you a r company setting up stalls for customers. Customers pay u a package price to set up 20 stalls.

One of your stalls totally stuck shit, are you going to tell your customers who pay you for 20 stalls to go to other stalls that they like and ignore this?

Or you are going to either close this stall or revamp it to the customers' liking?

[HarleyFatboy]

29 minutes ago, SierraTM said:

Let me give you an example.

Lets say you a r company setting up stalls for customers. Customers pay u a package price to set up 20 stalls.

One of your stalls totally stuck shit, are you going to tell your customers who pay you for 20 stalls to go to other stalls that they like and ignore this?

Or you are going to either close this stall or revamp it to the customers' liking?

BRAVO.......good analogy STM!

[miscvoyeur]

2 hours ago, SierraTM said:

Let me give you an example.

Lets say you a r company setting up stalls for customers. Customers pay u a package price to set up 20 stalls.

One of your stalls totally stuck shit, are you going to tell your customers who pay you for 20 stalls to go to other stalls that they like and ignore this?

Or you are going to either close this stall or revamp it to the customers' liking?

Not a good analogy because how exactly do you tailor make every single stall to suite every single customer? The answer is you can't.

@Fagen is right in his statement, because you when dealing with RLC, you're not paying for 26 apartments that are going to be to your specific liking. You are only paying for the access to all apartments, and you pick the ones you like.

 

[HarleyFatboy]

3 hours ago, miscvoyeur said:

Not a good analogy because how exactly do you tailor make every single stall to suite every single customer? The answer is you can't.

@Fagen is right in his statement, because you when dealing with RLC, you're not paying for 26 apartments that are going to be to your specific liking. You are only paying for the access to all apartments, and you pick the ones you like.

His analogy was spot on!  You are just trying to convince yourself, because of your own beliefs of how RLC is and how it suits your needs, that his analogy is incorrect.  STM is spot on and I will stand behind him on this!  If you have one stall that people don't like, you change that stall, you just don't ignore it.  The customer is always right in business and if not, your business isn't going to survive.  RLC only survives because it's in the porn business and porn is popular with a lot of people.  They could never survive in a different market because they don't care about their customers!

Fagen is wrong in his statement not because you are paying for access to 26 apartments that you think are going to be to your liking, but because they are not maintained with fresh couples.  Once a couple gets in with RLC, it's all over and you're stuck with them unless they get kicked out for domestic violence or trying to burn the place down.....case in point, Steve of the Donna and Steve apartment.  I never would have thought they would have brought that guy back, and then they changed his name hoping nobody would notice and people on this forum caught it immediately because people remember the good ones and the bad ones. He was boring and stupid when with Vanessa and now your stuck with him until he messes up again.

There should be a time limit of 1 year and then move that couple out and bring in a new couple, a fresh couple.  The good/popular couples for a year will be recycled just like the Barcelona girls are.  There will always be recycling on RLC so the freshness becomes less and less.  You eventually start seeing nothing but the same people over and over again, like watching a room with the same 100 people in it year after year, the view never changes and it becomes monotonous and boring.  It goes with the saying......if you are not the lead dog, the view never changes.  So my point is without freshness, your selection is cut down by a minimum of two thirds.

[charliefoxx69]

6 minutes ago, HarleyFatboy said:

His analogy was spot on!  You are just trying to convince yourself, because of your own beliefs of how RLC is and how it suits your needs, that his analogy is incorrect.  STM is spot on and I will stand behind him on this!  If you have one stall that people don't like, you change that stall, you just don't ignore it.  The customer is always right in business and if not, your business isn't going to survive.  RLC only survives because it's in the porn business and porn is popular with a lot of people.  They could never survive in a different market because they don't care about their customers!

Fagen is wrong in his statement not because you are paying for access to 26 apartments that you think are going to be to your liking, but because they are not maintained with fresh couples.  Once a couple gets in with RLC, it's all over and you're stuck with them unless they get kicked out for domestic violence or trying to burn the place down.....case in point, Steve of the Donna and Steve apartment.  I never would have thought they would have brought that guy back, and then they changed his name hoping nobody would notice and people on this forum caught it immediately because people remember the good ones and the bad ones. He was boring and stupid when with Vanessa and now your stuck with him until he messes up again.

There should be a time limit of 1 year and then move that couple out and bring in a new couple, a fresh couple.  The good/popular couples for a year will be recycled just like the Barcelona girls are.  There will always be recycling on RLC so the freshness becomes less and less.  You eventually start seeing nothing but the same people over and over again, like watching a room with the same 100 people in it year after year, the view never changes and it becomes monotonous and boring.  It goes with the saying......if you are not the lead dog, the view never changes.  So my point is without freshness, your selection is cut down by a minimum of two thirds.

Harley the self decribed, non-subscriber.

You sure have a lot to say for someone who claims he does not Pay or watch.

What a life, to dedicate so much of your time to writing all your mostly negative diatribe all throughout this forum.

That reminds me "opinions" are like assholes <- everyone has one.

Nice post!! 😞 🙂

[Fagen]

12 hours ago, Thestarider said:

They need to take B-2 offline until they find some participants for the project, The NUNS need to GTHO and quit wasting the voyeurs time and MONEY. The Barcelona apartment are the cash cows for RLC and B-2 has fallen off the face of the earth. no one watches this place or comments in the forum since the NUNS showed up. 12 pages in the last week and half. Hell most of the couples apartments have more activity.... lol so much for the flagship apartment.

Most importantly Fagen, I don't need your advice, but thanks for offering 😉

I know you dont was just saying, dont understand why people complain so much about b2, it is what it is. Antonia is a cute good looking girl, same if she dont bate I still like to watch her do whatever or when she takes a shower and things like that, is nice. I know people want back Monica, she was nice enough but again with her bating 4-5 times a day it became a little unreal / boring

[Fagen]

12 hours ago, SierraTM said:

Let me give you an example.

Lets say you a r company setting up stalls for customers. Customers pay u a package price to set up 20 stalls.

One of your stalls totally stuck shit, are you going to tell your customers who pay you for 20 stalls to go to other stalls that they like and ignore this?

Or you are going to either close this stall or revamp it to the customers' liking?

People have different taste is all, just because some people don't like it doesnt mean they should shut it down cause others like me might actually watch.

[Fagen]

10 hours ago, miscvoyeur said:

Not a good analogy because how exactly do you tailor make every single stall to suite every single customer? The answer is you can't.

@Fagen is right in his statement, because you when dealing with RLC, you're not paying for 26 apartments that are going to be to your specific liking. You are only paying for the access to all apartments, and you pick the ones you like.

 

Exactly well put, bravo.

[Fagen]

6 hours ago, HarleyFatboy said:

If you have one stall that people don't like, you change that stall, you just don't ignore it.

 

And the rest who do like it are going to complain and say why did you change it. It's the good thing about RLC that there is something for everyone. The people here complaining about b2 does not speak for everyone 🙂

[SierraTM]

Il y a 10 heures, miscvoyeur a dit :

Not a good analogy because how exactly do you tailor make every single stall to suite every single customer? The answer is you can't.

@Fagen is right in his statement, because you when dealing with RLC, you're not paying for 26 apartments that are going to be to your specific liking. You are only paying for the access to all apartments, and you pick the ones you like.

I don't think you get my analogy.

No one can make a product or sell a dish that EVERYONE likes. So problem here is, this apartment is boring, the girls are like dead fish and everyone knows but only a few talks about it.

What does RLC do? NOTHING. Can they or should they do something about? Maybe, if they are serious about their work and work for customers satisfaction.

And so lets say the customers supposedly have 20 stalls to choose from but 6 of them are stale and sell bad food, do they then have 20 stalls to choose from as advertised?

And when you pay what you paid for, which are 20 stalls but only 14 are watchable, are you overpaying or do you feel cheated?

This is NEVER about paying for access, but paying for value and quality and along the way, improvement from the content provider for what you paid.

Will there be improvement in B2? This is the second nunnery they built within like 3 months?

Why do people still defend bullshit from content provider like this is their greatest work but just no one appreciates it?

RLC is not selling art, they are selling porn.

 

[miscvoyeur]

2 minutes ago, SierraTM said:

I don't think you get my analogy.

No one can make a product or sell a dish that EVERYONE likes. So problem here is, this apartment is boring, the girls are like dead fish and everyone knows but only a few talks about it.

What does RLC do? NOTHING. Can they or should they do something about? Maybe, if they are serious about their work and work for customers satisfaction.

And so lets say the customers supposedly have 20 stalls to choose from but 6 of them are stale and sell bad food, do they then have 20 stalls to choose from as advertised?

And when you pay what you paid for, which are 20 stalls but only 14 are watchable, are you overpaying or do you feel cheated?

This is NEVER about paying for access, but paying for value and quality and along the way, improvement from the content provider for what you paid.

Will there be improvement in B2? This is the second nunnery they built within like 3 months?

Why do people still defend bullshit from content provider like this is their greatest work but just no one appreciates it?

RLC is not selling art, they are selling porn.

I think you're wrong on multiple levels.

1. Ok. B2 is boring and you say RLC does nothing. What exactly should RLC do to rectify this? Because I promise you no matter what solution you come up with, somebody will have an issue with it, which will only prove my point.

2. Using your stall anology, who determines if a stall sells bad food? You? Or another paying customer who may not have an issue with the food at all.

3. Paying for RLC actually IS about paying for access. You're just wrong on that mate. The proof is right on the front page. As for the "value and quality..." as you put it, again, who exactly determines that?

 

4. I'm not defending this apartment. I don't watch it. In fact, I don't watch any of the barca apartments. But your comparison of RLC to food stalls is wrong. It's like comparing apples to oranges.

5. "RLC is not selling art, they are selling porn." Ok, and if they don't provide this porn you think they're selling, what exactly are you going to do about it?

[dontgetnone]

17:30 Grace and Tori left