Jump to content

Leora -Johnny 5, and others Special Chat Room 2019 #4


StnCld316

Recommended Posts

  • StnCld316 changed the title to Leora -Johnny 5, and others Special Chat Room 2019 #4
19 hours ago, raul399 said:

I completely agree with you ... we are voyeurs ...
"voyeur" (from the French voyeur). They seek sexual arousal by observing naked people or engaging in some form of sexual activity; however, it does not imply any further sexual activity on the part of the voyeurist.
 It seems that the powerful Yankee dollar has won the day, because she entered into a routine that is onerous for Europe but tailor-made for America.
that makes us pornography consumers, we have to go to watch the videos (replay) ... if I want to see pornography do not pay a membership, I access a porn site and choose what I want to see, (porn a la carte ).
For my part I have already made a decision, I have canceled my membership, I will continue for a few more days, until it ends.


I completely agree with you .... we are voyeurs ..
«voyeur» (from French voyeur). They seek to obtain sexual arousal by observing naked people or performing some type of sexual activity; however, it does not imply any subsequent sexual activity by the voyeurist.
 it seems that the powerful Yankee dollar has won the day, because she entered into a routine that is burdensome for Europe but made to measure for America
that makes us consumers of pornography, we have to go watch the videos (replay) ... yes I want to see pornography I do not pay a membership, I access a porn site and choose what I want to see, (a la carte porn).
For my part I have already made a decision, I have canceled my membership, I will continue a few more days, until it ends.

Whilst I haven't always agreed with or understood much of what Raul399 has said or had opinions on in the past, I do understand what he is alluding to in the above statement, and to an extent sympathise with him. 

He is as he states a voyeur, and as such obtains his sexual excitement from being " in the moment " always anticipating and hoping for the next thrill. 

What he arguably is stating is that because of the schedule that Leora is working to ( I don't watch so cannot confirm } supposedly for the American Audience, then he because he is European is not therefor able to view her " In the moment " but hours later on replay, which to him is no different to logging into a porn site and watching a recording from days,weeks months or even years ago....his thrill factor along with the perceived personal relationship has gone, so whats the point of him watching any longer. 

Previously he had mentioned that he expected more from Leora......That remark coupled with some other members posts seem to indicate that she has shown some new and exciting techniques that obviously pleased them, but she has since possibly failed to repeat and has reverted to " predictable " methods ....Perhaps I am wrong ( I'm sure someone will inform me ) but I suppose that can cause disappointment and frustration, especially as she has all the time and space without the fear of interruptions to totally experiment and express herself, in the knowledge that she would get the appropriate feedback to gauge if her audience enjoyed it or not.....If they did, give them more....If they didn't then don't repeat it...........Good promotion, It shows that you are not taking your audience for granted,and that they are special, and an effective method of holding an audience in the palm of your hand.

I hope you don't decide to permanently leave Raul, and you see if she rethinks her strategy.....I wish you good luck and health.😺

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jimbo4 said:

Whilst I haven't always agreed with or understood much of what Raul399 has said or had opinions on in the past, I do understand what he is alluding to in the above statement, and to an extent sympathise with him. 

He is as he states a voyeur, and as such obtains his sexual excitement from being " in the moment " always anticipating and hoping for the next thrill. 

What he arguably is stating is that because of the schedule that Leora is working to ( I don't watch so cannot confirm } supposedly for the American Audience, then he because he is European is not therefor able to view her " In the moment " but hours later on replay, which to him is no different to logging into a porn site and watching a recording from days,weeks months or even years ago....his thrill factor along with the perceived personal relationship has gone, so whats the point of him watching any longer. 

Previously he had mentioned that he expected more from Leora......That remark coupled with some other members posts seem to indicate that she has shown some new and exciting techniques that obviously pleased them, but she has since possibly failed to repeat and has reverted to " predictable " methods ....Perhaps I am wrong ( I'm sure someone will inform me ) but I suppose that can cause disappointment and frustration, especially as she has all the time and space without the fear of interruptions to totally experiment and express herself, in the knowledge that she would get the appropriate feedback to gauge if her audience enjoyed it or not.....If they did, give them more....If they didn't then don't repeat it...........Good promotion, It shows that you are not taking your audience for granted,and that they are special, and an effective method of holding an audience in the palm of your hand.

I hope you don't decide to permanently leave Raul, and you see if she rethinks her strategy.....I wish you good luck and health.😺

 

It's also sad that both Raul and Johnny5 have fallen out over this difference of opinion, you both apparently had a good banter going on between you.....Not everyone shares the same opinion guys......Accept it.....Life's too short!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone hasn't been frustrated over not getting what they wanted, I just didn't like Raul's way of dealing with it, he completely turned on her, personally I don't post when that happens and take a couple deep breaths first, and he's wrong, she does stay awake all night, but not to please americans, she doesn't even bate during those hours usually, she just likes being up at night, I think because she feels she can relax then, that there's no expectations in the middle of the night and she forgets the cameras for a while while watching instagram and series and drinking tea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Johnny 5 said:

I don't think anyone hasn't been frustrated over not getting what they wanted, I just didn't like Raul's way of dealing with it, he completely turned on her, personally I don't post when that happens and take a couple deep breaths first, and he's wrong, she does stay awake all night, but not to please americans, she doesn't even bate during those hours usually, she just likes being up at night, I think because she feels she can relax then, that there's no expectations in the middle of the night and she forgets the cameras for a while while watching instagram and series and drinking tea.

With respect Johnny, from what I read on the forums and through clips that are sent to me, much of her bating is between the hours of 2300-0400 European times, there may be the odd variation. Between those times are indeed ideal for North America I would imagine,

I am not privy to your viewing habits or from where your time zone is, so whether its ideal for you personally I wouldn't presume to comment.

You do however have ( And this is an observation, not a criticism ) a strong protective nature toward her, possibly over protective? nothing wrong with that, I myself have been and to an extent still do have the same protective nature, but keep it in perspective.

People are entitled to have these expectations of her Johnny, they pay their money to have expectations. If she were a nun then having sexual expectations about her would be outrageous, but she is not a nun and has the body men and women would kill for, and she enjoys showing it off, otherwise she wouldn't do it.....There are no free shows on RLC anymore I don't think, so the truth of the matter is she is now living albeit temporarily in a European time zone,but she apparently sleeps for most of the daylight hours, then goes out and returns in the evening. So for all the benefit the Europeans derive from her living among them, she may as well be living on the moon,

Please take my comments in the spirit they were meant, and not as an inflammatory rant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jimbo4 said:

With respect Johnny, from what I read on the forums and through clips that are sent to me, much of her bating is between the hours of 2300-0400 European times, there may be the odd variation. Between those times are indeed ideal for North America I would imagine,

I am not privy to your viewing habits or from where your time zone is, so whether its ideal for you personally I wouldn't presume to comment.

You do however have ( And this is an observation, not a criticism ) a strong protective nature toward her, nothing wrong with that, I myself have been and to an extent still do have the same protective nature but keep it in perspective.

People are entitled to have these expectations of her Johnny, they pay their money to have expectations. If she were a nun then having sexual expectations about her would be outrageous, but she is not a nun and has the body men and women would kill for, and she enjoys showing it off, otherwise she wouldn't do it.....There are no free shows on RLC anymore I don't think, so the truth of the matter is she is now living albeit temporarily in a European time zone,but she apparently sleeps for most of it, then goes out and returns in the evening. So for all the benefit the Europeans derive from her living among them, she may as well be living on the moon,

Please take my comments in the spirit they were meant, and not as an inflammatory rant. 

I've always respected and liked almost all your posts in threads relating to the person usually referred to in these threads of the forum. Although there may have been some, and to my recollection very few items of subject matter in any of your posts relating to that particular person, that I ever had any disagreement with, I do respectfully have somewhat of a difference of opinion as to whether it should be considered acceptable that someone should choose to begin to more seriously criticize someone else more than previously ever had merely because of not feeling as much of being as satisfied as evidently may have been previously, mainly because of a change in venue that precipitated a change of available exposure of the person being criticized. Although there may have been some playful criticism from a particular person at times previous to a change in venue and thus times of availability of a person being criticized, it is imo that a change in venue and time of availability should not constitute a reason to more seriously criticize the person who was involved in the changes. Although it is certain that the times of availability for one particular person had changed with the change in venue and location, as it is certain as well that there is difference from someone actually viewing something live and in real time as compared to something recorded, and it also certain that everyone is entitled to their own views and opinions of various subject matter, but is also imo that it is actually quite ridiculous for anyone's views and opinions to change to a point of turning from criticisms of more of a playful nature, to that of more serious criticisms merely because of something as trivial as is a difference of exposure time availability as has occurred with the one particular person of the project, and recent changes in venue related to the project with that person. Any possible viewers in the northwestern hemisphere were in a similar predicament before the changes in venue and times occurred. As far as expectations are concerned, I agree to an extent that when anyone pays for something, they have reasonable expectations to have received something worth what they have paid for. It is likely that some had gotten used to certain activities or occasions of occurrences of more interest to them occurring to have grown to expect more of those occasions of more interest to occur, and especially if they were paying customers, but everyone knows what the project was started out to be, and is supposed to be before they ever pay to have a subscription. So it is imo, that expectations should perhaps be kept at a minimum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nicholas said:

I've always respected and liked almost all your posts in threads relating to the person usually referred to in these threads of the forum. Although there may have been some, and to my recollection very few items of subject matter in any of your posts relating to that particular person, that I ever had any disagreement with, I do respectfully have somewhat of a difference of opinion as to whether it should be considered acceptable that someone should choose to begin to more seriously criticize someone else more than previously ever had merely because of not feeling as much of being as satisfied as evidently may have been previously, mainly because of a change in venue that precipitated a change of available exposure of the person being criticized.Although there may have been some playful criticism from a particular person at times previous to a change in venue and thus times of availability of a person being criticized, it is imo that a change in venue and time of availability should not constitute a reason to more seriously criticize the person who was involved in the changes. Although it is certain that the times of availability for one particular person had changed with the change in venue and location, as it is certain as well that there is difference from someone actually viewing something live and in real time as compared to something recorded, and it also certain that everyone is entitled to their own views and opinions of various subject matter, but is also imo that it is actually quite ridiculous for anyone 's views and opinions to change to a point of turning from criticisms of more of a playful nature, to that of more serious criticisms merely because of something as trivial as is a difference of exposure time availability as has occurred with the one particular person of the project, and recent changes in venue related to the project with that person. Any possible viewers in the northwestern hemisphere were in a similar predicament before the changes in venue and times occurred. As far as expectations are concerned, I agree to an extent that when anyone pays for something, they have reasonable expectations to have received something worth what they have paid for.It is likely that some had gotten used to certain activities or occasions of occurrences of more interest to them occurring to have grown to expect more of those occasions of more interest to occur, and especially if they were paying customers, but everyone knows what the project was started out to be, and is supposed to be before they ever pay to have a subscription. So it is imo, that expectations should perhaps be kept at a minimum. 

As was indicated Nich, it's all about peoples opinions and expectations.

I would imagine that most people are aware of what the project was supposed to be at the start, but are also fully aware of what the project has now become, and naturally depends greatly on what that particular persons expectations are

I wasn't necessarily stating that I agreed with everything Raul indicated, only that I could sympathise with what he felt after reading what his expectations as a voyeur were.

It matters not to me, as I no longer watch her live anyway .... although I would at the drop of a hat given the opportunity, but that's my own fault, not hers.

Always good to hear from you Nich.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jimbo4 said:

As was indicated Nich, it's all about peoples opinions and expectations.

I would imagine that most people are aware of what the project was supposed to be at the start, but are also fully aware of what the project has now become, and naturally depends greatly on what that particular persons expectations are

I wasn't necessarily stating that I agreed with everything Raul indicated, only that I could sympathise with what he felt after reading what his expectations as a voyeur were.

It matters not to me, as I no longer watch her live anyway .... although I would at the drop of a hat given the opportunity, but that's my own fault, not hers.

Always good to hear from you Nich.

You as well jimbo.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Il y a 3 heures, Nicholas a dit :

I've always respected and liked almost all your posts in threads relating to the person usually referred to in these threads of the forum. Although there may have been some, and to my recollection very few items of subject matter in any of your posts relating to that particular person, that I ever had any disagreement with, I do respectfully have somewhat of a difference of opinion as to whether it should be considered acceptable that someone should choose to begin to more seriously criticize someone else more than previously ever had merely because of not feeling as much of being as satisfied as evidently may have been previously, mainly because of a change in venue that precipitated a change of available exposure of the person being criticized.

Although there may have been some playful criticism from a particular person at times previous to a change in venue and thus times of availability of a person being criticized, it is imo that a change in venue and time of availability should not constitute a reason to more seriously criticize the person who was involved in the changes.

Although it is certain that the times of availability for one particular person had changed with the change in venue and location, as it is certain as well that there is difference from someone actually viewing something live and in real time as compared to something recorded, and it also certain that everyone is entitled to their own views and opinions of various subject matter, but is also imo that it is actually quite ridiculous for anyone's views and opinions to change to a point of turning from criticisms of more of a playful nature, to that of more serious criticisms merely because of something as trivial as is a difference of exposure time availability as has occurred with the one particular person of the project, and recent changes in venue related to the project with that person.

Any possible viewers in the northwestern hemisphere were in a similar predicament before the changes in venue and times occurred. As far as expectations are concerned, I agree to an extent that when anyone pays for something, they have reasonable expectations to have received something worth what they have paid for. It is likely that some had gotten used to certain activities or occasions of occurrences of more interest to them occurring to have grown to expect more of those occasions of more interest to occur, and especially if they were paying customers, but everyone knows what the project was started out to be, and is supposed to be before they ever pay to have a subscription.

So it is imo, that expectations should perhaps be kept at a minimum. 

Sir, you know the concept of 'paragraphs' and writing with shorter sentences?

I think you write sense but damn, reading it is tough so let me help you.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, Nicholas explained to me once why he write like that, it's actually suppose to be hard to read for a certain person that might read 😉 At first I thought he was some old billionaire aristocrat secret society member that talked like that 🙂

Hello my beautiful 🧡😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...