Jump to content

Leora, Malia General Chat Topic #65 August 2020


HarleyFatboy

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, jimbo4 said:

Exhibitionism is not porn mate, it’s purely a sexual deviation or fetish, and the voyeur part being played by us the viewers is likewise. At best Leora can not be an exhibitionist without someone ( us ) to watch her, and we as voyeurs need her to satisfy our sexual deviation.

A porn site to me is something you turn on and get immediate wall to wall sex....Watching Leora is purely voyeurism as you are not guaranteed anything at all. In essence you could be watching two or three days without seeing anything..unlike a porn site.

 

Screenshot_20200812-181137.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Kiko1313 said:

It is a porn site. It has components of voyeurism, and is certainly different to most porn sites - but still a porn site. 

There you have it, sports fans.

Now hie thee back to La Mancha and let the rest of us enjoy the sex show.

Shhhh...here comes the part where she picks up a dime without using her hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, jimbo4 said:

Exhibitionism is not porn mate, it’s purely a sexual deviation or fetish, and the voyeur part being played by us the viewers is likewise. At best Leora can not be an exhibitionist without someone ( us ) to watch her, and we as voyeurs need her to satisfy our sexual deviation.

A porn site to me is something you turn on and get immediate wall to wall sex....Watching Leora is purely voyeurism as you are not guaranteed anything at all. In essence you could be watching two or three days without seeing anything..unlike a porn site.

Calling it a porn site is not deragotory towards Leora or the other tenants. Calling them whores, sluts and the like is deragotory. I understand your thinking. I don't watch for the sex part of it, but most people do. I believe you watch her for the same reason as I do.

  • Like 6
  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

    Regardless of how it is spun or what may be printed in dictionaries as far as any definitions may go, as jimbo alluded to, it's quite likely that a majority of people without referring to or resorting to any dictionaries definitions of terminology, would think that exhibitionism is just people who do not mind showing most of thenselves, and that even there are some who don't mind showing all of themselves. Those that think in that mindset, would likely not think of or believe of exhibitionism as being the same as porn. Even when considering any exhibitionists who don't mind showing all of themselves, it's not the same as likely what a majority believe to be as is mainstream pornography. Most people consider pornography as being what is associated with what is considered to be those that act in, to manufacture what is considered by a majority as mainstream pornography. Neither exhibitionism, nor voyeurism should be considered in any context of what is considered to be mainstream pornography and not even close. When exhibitionists go to nude beaches, is that type of exhibitionism to be considered a form of pornography.....the answer is NO.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nicholas said:

    Regardless of how it is spun or what may be printed in dictionaries as far as any definitions may go, as jimbo alluded to, it's quite likely that a majority of people without referring to or resorting to any dictionaries definitions of terminology, would think that exhibitionism is just peole who do not mind showing most of thenselves, and that even some don't mind showing all of themselves. Those that think in that mindset, would likely not think of or believe of exhibitionism as being the same as porn. Even when considering any exhibitionists who don't mind showing all of theirselves, it's not the same as likely what a majority believe to be as is mainstream pornography or abreviated as porn. Most people consider pornography or porn for short, as being what is associated with what is considered those that act in to manufacture what is considered by a majority as mainstream pornography. Neither exhibitionism, nor voyeurism should be considered in any context of what is considered to be mainstream pornography and not even close.

Mixing remuneration into the equation throws a monkey wrench into your rationalization, Nick.

The gal on the bus flashing her panties at you and smiling is kinky.

If she gets paid to do it, it's porn.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, gomer said:

Mixing remuneration into the equation throws a monkey wrench into your rationalization, Nick.

The gal on the bus flashing her panties at you and smiling is kinky.

If she gets paid to do it, it's porn.

    Wrong again private pyle. Get down and give me a 100, on the double ! Now you've earned yourself a week of latrine duty on top of the rest as well !

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gomer said:

Poor Malia.

Working up a set of blue balls again.

 

    Think so huh...obviously you haven't come to any realization of who suggests the direction of those scenarios private pyle. I'll give you a hint....it may be Little Bo Peep and not Little Red Riding Hood. But it did appear that there were some attempts made to accrue some cam numbers. 😉

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gomer said:

Genitals + remuneration + cameras + audience = porn.

Whether it's wall to wall scrogging or poke and tickle, slap and giggle.

You're all sick, depraved, dirty, shameful window peeping pole yankers.  But not me.  I only watch for home decorating ideas and deep, philosophical discussion. 

 

     Lol. Now that's some funny assed stuff there I have to admit private pyle !  😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...