Dth Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 That video reminded me of the TV show China beach https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zc_-RTvyijc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozi Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 Did you know......(if you are American I assume / hope the answer is yes) that there appears to be more to Obamacare than we Aussies were first told about. Video of Obama election campaign then Section 5210 if the Health Bill Section 5210 from the ObamaCare bill starts: H. R. 3590-496 (Page 496) SEC. 5210. ESTABLISHING A READY RESERVE CORPS. Section 203 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 204) is amended to read as follows: "SEC. 203. COMMISSIONED CORPS AND READY RESERVE CORPS. "(a) ESTABLISHMENT.- "(1) IN GENERAL.-There shall be in the Service a commissioned Regular Corps and a Ready Reserve Corps for service in time of national emergency. "(2) REQUIREMENT.-All commissioned officers shall be citizens of the United States and shall be appointed without regard to the civil-service laws and compensated without regard to the Classification Act of 1923, as amended. "(3) APPOINTMENT.-Commissioned officers of the Ready Reserve Corps shall be appointed by the President and commissioned officers of the Regular Corps shall be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. "(4) ACTIVE DUTY.-Commissioned officers of the Ready Reserve Corps shall at all times be subject to call to active duty by the Surgeon General, including active duty for the purpose of training. "© PURPOSE AND USE OF READY RESEARCH.- "(1) PURPOSE.-The purpose of the Ready Reserve Corps is to fulfill the need to have additional Commissioned Corps personnel available on short notice (similar to the uniformed service's reserve program) to assist regular Commissioned Corps personnel to meet both routine public health and emergency response missions. "(2) USES.-The Ready Reserve Corps shall- "(A) participate in routine training to meet the general and specific needs of the Commissioned Corps; "(B) be available and ready for involuntary calls to active duty during national emergencies and public health crises, similar to the uniformed service reserve personnel; "© be available for backfilling critical positions left vacant during deployment of active duty Commissioned Corps members, as well as for deployment to respond to public health emergencies, both foreign and domestic; and "(D) be available for service assignment in isolated, hardship, and medically underserved communities (as defined in section 799B) to improve access to health services. This would appear to give Obama his own private army, hand picked by him, controlled by him. The comment attached to the extract was: Now, I ask you...currently we have the regular Army, the Marines, The Navy, the Air Force, the National Guard, state and local police, state troopers, first responders, firefighters, EMT, rescue workers of all kinds and in all locations, plus we have the Federal Emergency Management Agency, otherwise known as FEMA. So what exactly does Mr. Obama need a private "ready reserve corps" who are hand-picked by him and report directly to him for? Comments? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foamy T. Squirrel Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 Did you know......(if you are American I assume / hope the answer is yes) that there appears to be more to Obamacare than we Aussies were first told about. Actually, I did download this 2,000 page monster, and managed to read far more of it that any of our elected officials. This is a "Progressive's Manifesto," in which the people are protected because they are enslaved. It was run through the Marxist-controlled Congress in the dead of night, they passed it, I've found what's in it, and it's actually just this simple concept: totalitarian control. One year after it passed, my company's health premiums escalated by 40%. So I didn't hire another employee, and I quit investing in the business. The costs of health care, like the costs of food, energy, and the U6 unemployment rate, have necessarily skyrocketed under Obama's administration. I'm Atlas Shrugged. Fuck them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozi Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 I nearly posted this in your new weird shit thread. The only shit was when I shit myself after watching it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBG 150 Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 He really is a nauseating, disgusting piece of shit, isn't he. What an embarrassment to the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozi Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 He really is a nauseating, disgusting piece of shit, isn't he. What an embarrassment to the world. ..........and a serious threat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozi Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 Did you know…………… that on the 27 November 1967, Charles de Gaulle said no to Britain joining the European Economic Community (EEC) for the second time. The French President said he would veto Britain's application to join the Common Market and he warned France's five partners in the EEC that if they tried to impose British membership on France it would result in the break-up of the community. All the other five members; Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Italy and Germany had said they would support negotiations towards British membership. Only France opposed it. General de Gaulle accused Britain of a deep-seated hostility towards the European Community and said London also showed a lack of interest in the Community and would require a radical transformation before joining the EEC. He also said the EEC was incompatible with their economy and went on to list a number of aspects of Britain's financial structure and model, from working practices to agriculture, which he said made Britain incompatible with Europe. General de Gaulle was so adamant about the UK not joining the EEC; he was prepared to risk its destruction. The cause of his aggression was never clear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
van the man Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 History has actually prove De Gaulle to be totally RIGHT!! The UK should never have joined. It has been a disaster from start to finish. We got sold out by our then Prime Minister Ted Heath. He was a closet gay who has since been implicated in a known paedophile ring that operated around Westminster back in the 60's, 70's. He was one of our worst ever Prime Ministers and just wanted to go down in history as the man that took us into Europe. He was prepared to do it regardless of cost. He destroyed our fishing industry and many others as well. The cost of entry still means we pay £50m per day to be a member. This of course helps to pay inefficient French farmers who refuse to join the 21st century. Get us out of the EU now!! Oh and Scotland, or should I refer to it as 'The Socialist Republic of Scotland' need to hurry up and vote yes to independence then they can fuck off and learn to pay for everything themselves instead of sponging off the English whilst kicking us in the teeth at every opportunity. We can then get stuck in to rebuilding Hadrian's Wall to keep the selfish fuckers out of England!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linked Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 My last post here was supposed was supposed to have been about the Huey and how it changed the way we do battle, but the way I wrote it, it became more about the Vets than the Huey so I left the video clip out so as not to detract from them. Now if it had been solely about the Huey, this is what you would have got: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBd1hBT9vNc Did you know that Chuck Norris once had intimate relations with a Huey? This is when the all mighty Apache Attack helicopter was born. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozi Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Did you know that ASC (Australian Submarine Corporation) Pty Ltd, was founded on June 29 1987. It is a wholly government-owned Australian naval shipbuilding company headquartered at Osborne in Adelaide, South Australia, specialising in design and construction of submarines, as well as the nearly completed air warfare destroyers (AWD). Yet for one of the biggest defence equipment decisions in decades, the Abbott Government will select the Japanese-built Soryu Class submarine to replace locally built Collins Class boats as the navy’s key strike weapon beyond 2030. A decision to spend more than $20 billion on up to 10 of the Japanese vessels will be announced before the end of the year. Great government decision considering that the ship building industry is already struggling, with thousands about to be unemployed when Holden, Ford and Toyota shut down production of the automobile industry. Thousands more will lose their jobs when manufacturing companies, allied to the motor industry, also shut their doors. Well done Tony Abbott, another awesome decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foamy T. Squirrel Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Did you know that is perfectly popular for idiot leaders to take their needs off shore? Take Obama, for example. By jobbing-out the US manned-space program to Putin, he was able to allow some of the world's best space engineers to spend more time with their families permanently, and allowed NASA to focus on its mission of working as a Muslim outreach program. We're talking squirrelly and rooly wrath in the making. Big time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozi Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 Our intelligence agency has raised the country's security threat level to high. Although a threat act is not imminent, it is likely to occur. Our illustrious Prime Minister has announced to the world that our security and intelligence agencies are up to the task because we are smarter than the terrorists. If that's not a challenge, I don't know what is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts