O_U812 Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 2 hours ago, Ridgerunner said: Wrong! Trump’s Popularity Declines Among Republicans After Brutal Week MORNINGCONSULT.COM A week that brought the final straw in President Donald Trump’s crusade against President-elect Joe Biden’s Electoral College victory and acts... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O_U812 Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 6 hours ago, happyone said: They are the same person--when he needs more likes, he logs in as golfer. When golfer needs likes, he logs in again as O_U812 😏 Wow. You get that bullshit from QANON? 😒 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O_U812 Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 6 hours ago, happyone said: I hate to say this, but the first 2 pages Ridge posted nothing, but golfer and O_U812 posted nothing but mostly Trump hate posts. They are the ones carrying on this Trump hate campaign ad nauseum. And BTW--there is still a forum called Trump, all about Trump, where you all can dismember him verbally all you want. Trump--all about Trump, Trump bashing, Trump praise, defending Trump - Worldwide Political Discussions - CamCaps.Net then maybe (but not probably) this forum can return to non insulting posting and conversation about US General Domestic Politics Awwww......Are you butthurt again? Trump's impeachment has EVERYTHING to do with US domestic politics. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O_U812 Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 2 hours ago, Ridgerunner said: And how do they go about invoking it? I suggest you read the Fourteenth Amendment. It takes 2/3 votes of both Houses to remove or prevent someone from serving in government via the 14th Amendment. Please explain to me how the Democrats can get 2/3 support in both Houses. 14th Amendment – Section Three Section Three of the amendment, gave Congress the authority to bar public officials, who took an oath of allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, from holding office if they "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against the Constitution. The intent was to prevent the president from allowing former leaders of the Confederacy to regain power within the U.S. government after securing a presidential pardon. It states that a two-thirds majority vote in Congress is required to allow public officials who had engaged in rebellion to regain the rights of American citizenship and hold government or military office. It states that: "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O_U812 Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 2 hours ago, Ridgerunner said: And how do they go about invoking it? I suggest you read the Fourteenth Amendment. It takes 2/3 votes of both Houses to remove or prevent someone from serving in government via the 14th Amendment. Please explain to me how the Democrats can get 2/3 support in both Houses. AGAIN, you have not done your research. You pull talking points out of your ass and just throw them at this thread. You're not 2/3 as smart as you think. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golfer06 Posted January 26, 2021 Author Share Posted January 26, 2021 15 hours ago, Ridgerunner said: Reich just gave a perfect description of himself and the Democratic Party. it's a shame that you can't even find 1 response to anything that didn't come from oppositeland. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golfer06 Posted January 26, 2021 Author Share Posted January 26, 2021 14 hours ago, Ridgerunner said: I see President Trump is still living in your brain. Think you will ever talk about anything besides him? just reporting the news. try reading it once in a while. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golfer06 Posted January 26, 2021 Author Share Posted January 26, 2021 14 hours ago, Ridgerunner said: More Fake News. Why are you and Democrats so afraid that Trump will run for president again? Is it because you and they know that Trump defeated Biden in the 2020 election? still refusing to face reality i see. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golfer06 Posted January 26, 2021 Author Share Posted January 26, 2021 12 hours ago, Ridgerunner said: Letitia James is an incompetent Democrat political hack. save it. soon you can send a post card to dear leader in jail telling him that. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golfer06 Posted January 26, 2021 Author Share Posted January 26, 2021 9 hours ago, Ridgerunner said: Impeaching someone who is no longer in office is unconstitutional, ANTIFA snowfake. Why do you think the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is refusing to take part in this charade? no it isn't. it has been done to others but this is the 1st time for a president. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golfer06 Posted January 26, 2021 Author Share Posted January 26, 2021 Historian declares Trump definitively 'disgraced' as the House delivers impeachment article - Alternet.org WWW.ALTERNET.ORG Michael Beschloss has sealed Donald Trump's fate for the rest of time, passing judgment on him as House Democrats presented the Article of Impeachment against the former president to the U.S. Senate."A... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golfer06 Posted January 26, 2021 Author Share Posted January 26, 2021 'That's insane': Ethics and legal experts weigh in on Supreme Court’s Trump emoluments decision - Alternet.org WWW.ALTERNET.ORG The U.S. Supreme Court has decided against hearing a case involving former President Donald Trump and the U.S. Constitution's Emoluments Clause, which prohibits a U.S. president from profiting from a foreign... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts