Ridgerunner Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 1 minute ago, StnCld316 said: They have never proven there was any fraud in a court of law. No judge would ever allow any evidence to be shown nor witnesses to testify. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgerunner Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 How long before O_U812 and the Golfer try to convince us that QAnon hired Black people to loot and burn stores in U.S. cities last summer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StnCld316 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 3 minutes ago, Ridgerunner said: No judge would ever allow any evidence to be shown nor witnesses to testify. They are going to have a day or two trying to prove it when Rudy Giuliani, Sydney Powell and Mike Lindell answer to their Billion Dollar+ lawsuits. Fox News chickened out by retracting their statements by admitting they made false claims. Rush Limbaugh had gotten silenced so we'll never know his version. Lucifer is making ground beef out of his soul. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guido Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 14 minutes ago, Ridgerunner said: No judge would ever allow any evidence to be shown nor witnesses to testify. The cases were handled exactly the way the procedural rules require, and it's exactly the way corporations avoid lawsuits every day. A plaintiff has to state enough factual assertions in their complaint to satisfy every element of the cause of action they are asserting. Fraud, specifically, has an even higher threshold for what must be stated in a complaint in order to avoid immediate dismissal. If a plaintiff doesn't meet this basic threshold in the complaint, judges are supposed to throw out the lawsuits so judicial resources are not wasted and defendants are not subjected to the harassment of frivolous lawsuits. You seem to be criticizing judges for doing exactly what the procedural rules require them to do. However, if you are unhappy cases were dismissed so quickly, you only have the plaintiffs' attorneys or the plaintiffs themselves to blame. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happyone Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 4 hours ago, O_U812 said: Wrong again, as usual. They're not putting them on the floor to sleep, they're feeding them actual food, they're giving them access to showers WITH soap. Just stop Ridge. link it or shut the fuck up 😏 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O_U812 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 1 hour ago, Ridgerunner said: No, she's feeding them a large diet of liberal progressive propaganda and idiots like you are gobbling it up. Yum-yum 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O_U812 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 49 minutes ago, happyone said: link it or shut the fuck up 😏 Awwww. You're triggered too? The anger on this thread is comical. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O_U812 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 1 hour ago, Ridgerunner said: No, you ate the BS about there being no voter fraud in the U.S. election. So your hero's guardian Bill Barr was lying too? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O_U812 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 1 hour ago, Ridgerunner said: Instead of worrying about that, Canadians like you should start becoming concerned about all the immigrants Biden is allowing to come across our southern border who will eventually end up coming into Canada. Says the flaming bigot. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O_U812 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 1 hour ago, Ridgerunner said: No judge would ever allow any evidence to be shown nor witnesses to testify. Trump-appointed judges even found the crying unworthy of a hearing, as did the SCOTUS. Rudy never submitted the lies because he would have been bitch-slapped with perjury charges and stripped of his law license. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O_U812 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 56 minutes ago, guido said: The cases were handled exactly the way the procedural rules require, and it's exactly the way corporations avoid lawsuits every day. A plaintiff has to state enough factual assertions in their complaint to satisfy every element of the cause of action they are asserting. Fraud, specifically, has an even higher threshold for what must be stated in a complaint in order to avoid immediate dismissal. If a plaintiff doesn't meet this basic threshold in the complaint, judges are supposed to throw out the lawsuits so judicial resources are not wasted and defendants are not subjected to the harassment of frivolous lawsuits. You seem to be criticizing judges for doing exactly what the procedural rules require them to do. However, if you are unhappy cases were dismissed so quickly, you only have the plaintiffs' attorneys or the plaintiffs themselves to blame. This ^ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O_U812 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 1 hour ago, Ridgerunner said: You probably live rent free in your mommy and daddys' basement, but no where close to my head. Think you'll ever be able to support yourself like a real man,or will you be a parasite the rest of your life? Boo-Hoo much troll? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts