O_U812 Posted April 1, 2021 Posted April 1, 2021 1 hour ago, golfer06 said: truth & reality is not an opinion. He just apes all our talking points. Ridiculous. 1
Ridgerunner Posted April 1, 2021 Posted April 1, 2021 4 hours ago, O_U812 said: Read the bill, then comment. I did, fuckhead.
Ridgerunner Posted April 1, 2021 Posted April 1, 2021 4 hours ago, O_U812 said: MORE minority voters, not "only." Something that I'm sure scares the shit out of you and the GQP. Only if they each vote two or three times in the same election.
Ridgerunner Posted April 1, 2021 Posted April 1, 2021 3 hours ago, golfer06 said: don't forget that if the legislature thinks that there is an inkling of fraud (such as dems winning) they can overturn the results. and before you start cheering that can go both ways. You mean like Nancy Pelosi is trying to remove a U.S. Congresswoman from Iowa whose election was certified by a bi-partisan commission in Iowa?
Ridgerunner Posted April 1, 2021 Posted April 1, 2021 4 hours ago, O_U812 said: The flights would be more peaceful for sure. Empty Delta planes would be very peaceful.
Ridgerunner Posted April 1, 2021 Posted April 1, 2021 2 hours ago, golfer06 said: Right-wing politics and anti-science positions are locked together in a literally deadly mix WWW.DAILYKOS.COM In an ideal world, Scientific American would not be a publication strongly associated with politics. That’s because in an ideal world, the idea of building on past discoveries through experimentation and... From the sign it looks like they're opposed to O_U812.
Ridgerunner Posted April 1, 2021 Posted April 1, 2021 2 hours ago, golfer06 said: truth & reality is not an opinion. The blogs you post stories from are primarily editorial comments (opinions) about news stories not unbiased news sources.
golfer06 Posted April 1, 2021 Posted April 1, 2021 22 minutes ago, Ridgerunner said: You mean like Nancy Pelosi is trying to remove a U.S. Congresswoman from Iowa whose election was certified by a bi-partisan commission in Iowa? who?
Ridgerunner Posted April 1, 2021 Posted April 1, 2021 9 hours ago, golfer06 said: they should leave now if that is what they are worried about. companies would lose tax breaks that they receive for leaving the country which is a bit stupid. biden's plan would reward companies that stay with tax breaks. what is wrong with that? So if a company had planned to leave but decides not to leave Biden would give them tax breaks, but a company that never planned to leave would not receive tax breaks? That sounds like a typical fair and logical Democrat plan.😏
golfer06 Posted April 1, 2021 Posted April 1, 2021 9 minutes ago, Ridgerunner said: The blogs you post stories from are primarily editorial comments (opinions) about news stories not unbiased news sources. comments about reality.
Ridgerunner Posted April 1, 2021 Posted April 1, 2021 1 minute ago, golfer06 said: who? Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks.
golfer06 Posted April 1, 2021 Posted April 1, 2021 1 minute ago, Ridgerunner said: So if a company had planned to leave but decides not to leave Biden would give them tax breaks, but a company that never planned to leave would not receive tax breaks? That sounds like a typical fair and logical Democrat plan.😏 all companies would be encouraged to stay & in return would receive tax breaks based on saving jobs. companies sending jobs out of the country would be penalized. it's common sense.
Recommended Posts