Howard

Eva's backside as she loads the dishwasher.

That video is a few months old but didn't realize until now who they are.

Its hypnosis. Stare at it too long and you'll turn into a zombie.

https://www42.zippyshare.com/v/CNlDnOqF/file.html

I don't discount your opinion but he wasn't passionate in the old apartment. There may be some 'familiarity' as their relationship is established. But he still lacks emotional skills when it comes to passion & romance.

She would. He doesn't. Not a romantic bone in him. If she had her way, they'd have sex 2x/day. But in this relationship, she is not the instigator.

Twice I recall Paul getting physical with her. First time was in their old apartment. Leora was going bonkers about something. She was extremely agitated. Consensus at the time was she may have been on (or off) medication. Paul didn't argue back very much but there was a point where for a couple seconds, he grabbed her by the right bicep and sat her down (on that butt-ugly orange couch). She then calmed down and Paul listened to what she had to say. About an hour later Leora opened the couch, put some bedding down and they fell asleep. Second time was about 24 months ago. Yvonne was still a pup (they got the dog about 2 months before they moved) World War III (or so it seemed) broke out. They were yelling at each other for a solid 20 minutes. Yvonne went AWOL - couldn't find where she was (maybe hiding). Leora was hysterical, waving her arms in anger. Paul grabbed her by the forearms (face-to-face) to calm her down. It kinda worked. He eventually walked out of the apartment and was gone for a couple hours. Leora sat in the GR. Upon his return, things were civil and they started talking in normal tones. Other then these two incidents, they get along fine. An argument every once in awhile but nothing out of the ordinary that any couple haves't done before.

BT is having pie for a late night snack. Carefully eating in bed so not sure if there will be any crumbs. If anyone can "'verify' whether or not there are crumbs, please share.

...which is why the DMCA exists. And if someone finds a work-around, it will be backward engineered and then back to step 1.

This video is a good example how 'sometimes' (and I'm being generous using that word), Paul has NO CLUE what he's doing. Purely from a scientific position of observation, look how distant Paul is within the first 5 minutes into the video. Then at the end when Leora gets her 'cookie', Paul can't leave the room fast enough. He doesn't know how to connect with Leora during intimate moments. He knows the basics (A goes into B). But as for romance or passion, he's clueless.

No better way to start your day.

I don't think they are watching porn.

Almost 5 years watching Maya and I can't recall seeing her wearing a dress.

You're Canadian - that's worse! 🙂

You can twist data like a pretzel. Focus is on jobs CREATED, not lost. Granted, they are probably blue collar minimum wage jobs. But its work. And its work that keeps the economy going.

WTF? They've been talking for over two hours! That's 2 hours more the Obama or any other recent POTUS the past 30 years. Even if nothing comes of this summit other then a "meet & greet", pessimistic hatred from liberals is to be expected...cuz that's how ya'll roll.

If a meme of Obama existed where his nose grew and grew whenever he said 'if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor' regarding Obamacare, liberals would call conservatives racist until their faces turned red. FYI, its been documented that Obama knew as much as 10 weeks prior to his 'speech' that for 70% of those already with health insurance who were not on Medi-care, you wouldn't be able to see the same doctor under Obamacare.

Truer words couldn't be said. Campuses have gotten to the point (Berkeley comes to mind) where freedom of speech is restricted. Remember the Ann Coulter mess? She's a conservative that the university hierarchy did everything they could for her not be allowed to speak. OK for liberals to speak. Heck - colleges will even provide security. The same can't be said for a conservative. And on a related note, billionaire George Soros goes about (like the Palestinian Authority) paying liberal voters to protest when a conservative is scheduled to speak at an event/auditorium. He also openly threatens to withhold donations to colleges that will allow a conservative to speak to students. It pains me to compare George Soros (whose sir name is Schwartz & born in Hungary) to the PA. Here's a (self-hating) Jew who survived Nazi Germany, where all his freedom (and that of his parents, bros and sisters) was taken away. And now he's doing the same thing - taking away the freedom of those to speak who differ with his theology based either on the threat of withholding donations or paying people to protest (and/or do so in a threatening manner). I would like to hear the argument for those IN FAVOR of liberalism. Something not based on emotion (don't care how you feel) but on fact. On data that shows (historically) liberal ideas are more beneficial to society than conservative idea. While I wait for a response, I will always remain standing, no matter who is POTUS, for the national anthem (as I did for Obama, Clinton & anti-simetic Carter). The honor & respect of the office is far greater then any man occupying it.

Republicans cut the fat in education spending. They cut the fat out of most expenses. How much out of each dollar spend on education goes towards administration, union expenses - at the end of the day, not much goes to text books. I had read a couple years ago in California, 43 cents out of every dollar allocated for education goes to funding teachers pension. And with almost each state bringing in hundreds of millions of dollars annually with lotteries that are suppose to fund education, kids are not nearly as well eductaed as those in Japan, Spain, China, etc). Its not the money allocated - its how its spent. Liberals control education.

You need to offer more then just sayng I am wrong. What evidence or theory do you have to make such a claim?

RLC is trying to be the Lexus of on-line cams with the customer service attitude of a 1st generation Hyundai. VH is like a backroom massage parlor. Its a revolving door of casual sex. I did a write up on them recently in another forum on this site, so I'll summarize. Now,...what RLC does well is they have apartments occupied by couples that are romantically involved. They have a service that shows the lives of couples who make love, not have sex (3 or 4x/daily). Realistically, can anyone reading this post have sex 4x/day, 7 days a week? Of course not - your wiener will get numb by the end of day two and within a few days, you'll desensitize yourself to what having sex is all about. Anyway, RLC couples stick around for awhile (RLC closets are usually filled with clothes). Unlike VH, which seems to have a revolving door. It seems VH is like a pimp that has subordinates that recruit kids to have sex on-line (with free room and board). RLC caters to a mature voyeur market. Unfortunately for them, a mature market is tighter with the wallet then the people VH goes after. RLC is what you watch if you're a romantic. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ VH is all about banging. Few couples are romantically involved. In fact, I would classify many of them as social outcasts (or grunge-like in their behavior). The way many are tatted up and their general behavior is conducive to "living in the moment" (casual sex, 3-somes, lots of drinking, un-kept apartments, etc). Have you seen a VH closet? You'll notice there is little clothes in most of the closets (as these kids don't have much to their name and/or live as vagabonds). They'll wear condoms to avoid pregnancy - not necessarily to avoid disease. VH caters more to the US market then RLC. If you notice, all the 'kids' stay up until dawn and bang (or party) between 4A-7A local time (which is 8P-11P US east coast time). To have 90% of your apartments stay up until dawn (local time) to bang,...that is a VH directive and VH wants the US dollars. Getting back to the poll, RLC is slipping because they are not adjusting to what the market wants (or where the money is). The market wants what VH is showing. Just fucking - no romance. To a certain degree, the people on VH reflect the people they want to attract in the US. The 13 - 25 yr old impressionable and 'live for the moment' males that only know about banging. Kids in high schools who get head, get laid, treat sex as an activity/sport/dare/contest among friends. VH knows it, caters to those people, and wants their money.

Disagree. Clinton was impeached and the stock market didn't flinch enough for there to be any concern. Historically, stocks do well under a Republican administration. FWIW, I do think the next time a democrat holds office (whether in 2022 or 2026), the market will sink. Two reasons come to mind: Trump is building up the military (someone will have to pay for that down the road). With a liberal in office, its spend, spend, spend on social programs using the band-aid philosophy. Liberals generally do not invest in infrastructure to fix a problems. And if they do, by the time a project is finished, it becomes outdated California's "train to nowhere", now 2x the cost at $80 billion and only 2% complete (state still acquiring land to lay tracks down on), is the perfect example promoted by a liberal governor. Train is suppose to eventually make travel cheaper between Los Angeles & San Francisco. How taking a train for 7 hours for a projected $59/one way will be cheaper by 2025 then a current $69 ticket for a 50 minute plane ride,.... The only reason this got funded is because it employs blue collar, uneducated people. This project does not fix a problem but it creates many problems (and guarantees many, many years of unnecessary administrative costs). The financial consequences or practicality of the project are just a minor issue. ..and this is tyical liberal behavior. Below are phrases I remind my liberal friends (and they never deny it - they just change the subject): Feed a man to fish, he eats for a day (liberal). Teach a man to fish, he eats for a lifetime (conservative).