Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 2/22/2018 at 12:36 AM, Amy3 said:

Haha! Had to edit out the “Amy is correct” part. Guess his comment was almost perfect huh Misc? 😂😂😂

Expand  

I can put it back in I just didn't want to miss quote you.:biggrin:

Posted
  On 2/22/2018 at 12:39 AM, Amy3 said:

Yes, lower the price! If I didn’t have the price cap, there is no way I would pay the full price right now. In a world of free porn, no way!

Expand  

Of course not lower the price. Its good the way it is now. You get a lot more as on any other similar site for a very good price. It would be really stupid lowering it. It should stay like it is. Even when the raise it for another 5 or 10$ it is still a lot cheaper than RLC with timeline. And RLC has no archive at all. 

Posted
  On 2/22/2018 at 12:42 AM, Amy3 said:

Ok, I’m a fair minded person! Did you edit the post before he quoted you or did he edit that part out? I value clarity over agreement and I’ll recant my charge if it was incorrect. 

Expand  

It was I that did the edit, sorry for the confusion.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
  On 2/22/2018 at 12:39 AM, Amy3 said:

Yes, lower the price! If I didn’t have the price cap, there is no way I would pay the full price right now. In a world of free porn, no way!

Expand  

Amy, what do you mean by "price cap"? Is this something that non, but could be, subscribers, should be aware of? A hidden deal?

Edited by tweety
Posted
  On 2/22/2018 at 12:45 AM, tweety said:

Amy, what do you mean by "price cap"? I this something that non, but could be, subscribers, should be aware of? A hidden deal?

Expand  

If you are a subscriber since the beginning you have the original price

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 2/22/2018 at 12:43 AM, jabbath1987 said:

Of course not lower the price. Its good the way it is now. You get a lot more as on any other similar site for a very good price. It would be really stupid lowering it. It should stay like it is. Even when the raise it for another 5 or 10$ it is still a lot cheaper than RLC with timeline. And RLC has no archive at all. 

Expand  

IMO they need to cap the amount of apt and that would even out the sub price.

Posted
  On 2/22/2018 at 12:45 AM, tweety said:

Amy, what do you mean by "price cap"? I this something that non, but could be, subscribers, should be aware of? A hidden deal?

Expand  

When you subscribe for a certain price lets say 30$ you wont pay more as long as you are subscribed even if they raise the price later. 

Posted
  On 2/22/2018 at 12:47 AM, Just In said:

IMO they need to cap the amount of apt and that would even out the sub price.

Expand  

When they do this they must close low performing places a lot faster otherwise we will have RLC boredom with no new places for months...

Posted
  On 2/22/2018 at 12:48 AM, jabbath1987 said:

When they do this they must close low performing places a lot faster otherwise we will have RLC boredom with no new places for months...

Expand  

The problem is what you may think is low performing is different from mine from a a voyeur perspective. I'm sure the metrics they use will be different from our views.:biggrin:

Posted
  On 2/22/2018 at 12:52 AM, Just In said:

The problem is what you may think is low performing is different from mine from a a voyeur perspective. I'm sure the metrics they use will be different from our views.:biggrin:

Expand  

Well I think even if people on CC are only a small amount of subscribers you can project the number of comments in topics pretty much to the numbers of viewers. It is like a survey to predict an election. But I think we both agree with no new places at all for month like RLC it would become really boring.

Posted
  On 2/22/2018 at 12:58 AM, Amy3 said:

Now, why in the world would you edit out the best part of your comment? 😧😁

Expand  

Ok just for you AMY WAS CORRECT.:biggrin:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...