Guest Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 Just now, Amy3 said: Haha! Had to edit out the “Amy is correct” part. Guess his comment was almost perfect huh Misc? 😂😂😂 I can put it back in I just didn't want to miss quote you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabbath1987 Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 Just now, Amy3 said: Yes, lower the price! If I didn’t have the price cap, there is no way I would pay the full price right now. In a world of free porn, no way! Of course not lower the price. Its good the way it is now. You get a lot more as on any other similar site for a very good price. It would be really stupid lowering it. It should stay like it is. Even when the raise it for another 5 or 10$ it is still a lot cheaper than RLC with timeline. And RLC has no archive at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 1 minute ago, Amy3 said: Ok, I’m a fair minded person! Did you edit the post before he quoted you or did he edit that part out? I value clarity over agreement and I’ll recant my charge if it was incorrect. It was I that did the edit, sorry for the confusion. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tweety Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Amy3 said: Yes, lower the price! If I didn’t have the price cap, there is no way I would pay the full price right now. In a world of free porn, no way! Amy, what do you mean by "price cap"? Is this something that non, but could be, subscribers, should be aware of? A hidden deal? Edited February 22, 2018 by tweety Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkles Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 Just now, tweety said: Amy, what do you mean by "price cap"? I this something that non, but could be, subscribers, should be aware of? A hidden deal? If you are a subscriber since the beginning you have the original price 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 3 minutes ago, jabbath1987 said: Of course not lower the price. Its good the way it is now. You get a lot more as on any other similar site for a very good price. It would be really stupid lowering it. It should stay like it is. Even when the raise it for another 5 or 10$ it is still a lot cheaper than RLC with timeline. And RLC has no archive at all. IMO they need to cap the amount of apt and that would even out the sub price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabbath1987 Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 Just now, tweety said: Amy, what do you mean by "price cap"? I this something that non, but could be, subscribers, should be aware of? A hidden deal? When you subscribe for a certain price lets say 30$ you wont pay more as long as you are subscribed even if they raise the price later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabbath1987 Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 Just now, Just In said: IMO they need to cap the amount of apt and that would even out the sub price. When they do this they must close low performing places a lot faster otherwise we will have RLC boredom with no new places for months... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tweety Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 Just now, Amy3 said: Whatever the price is when you subscribe it says the same even if the price goes up. Thanks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 1 minute ago, jabbath1987 said: When they do this they must close low performing places a lot faster otherwise we will have RLC boredom with no new places for months... The problem is what you may think is low performing is different from mine from a a voyeur perspective. I'm sure the metrics they use will be different from our views. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabbath1987 Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 2 minutes ago, Just In said: The problem is what you may think is low performing is different from mine from a a voyeur perspective. I'm sure the metrics they use will be different from our views. Well I think even if people on CC are only a small amount of subscribers you can project the number of comments in topics pretty much to the numbers of viewers. It is like a survey to predict an election. But I think we both agree with no new places at all for month like RLC it would become really boring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 Just now, Amy3 said: Now, why in the world would you edit out the best part of your comment? 😧😁 Ok just for you AMY WAS CORRECT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts