jjkopite Posted September 30, 2018 Share Posted September 30, 2018 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjkopite Posted September 30, 2018 Share Posted September 30, 2018 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x1000 Posted September 30, 2018 Share Posted September 30, 2018 4 hours ago, jabbath1987 said: New girls? new kids 😂 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkles Posted October 1, 2018 Share Posted October 1, 2018 There must be some kind of problem in the house... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabbath1987 Posted October 1, 2018 Author Share Posted October 1, 2018 Just now, Sparkles said: There must be some kind of problem in the house... 0 138.01 kB 0 144.4 kB Loool at least no batman for @Amy3 😂 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy3 Posted October 1, 2018 Share Posted October 1, 2018 3 minutes ago, jabbath1987 said: Loool at least no batman for @Amy3 😂 Thank goodness! Whew! Lol 😆 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjkopite Posted October 1, 2018 Share Posted October 1, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjkopite Posted October 1, 2018 Share Posted October 1, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy3 Posted October 1, 2018 Share Posted October 1, 2018 Just for the record, masks are anti-voyeurism. They say this, "I know you can see me, but I don't want you to see me, so I'm going to hide from you!". In a normal voyeur setting, the voyeur would accept that they have been spotted and would proceed to slink away into the darkness like a good pervert, not continue to stck around like a fool. I know, I know, this isn't voyeurism any more and I should just give it up! Oh well, maybe one day! This falls in line with groomy's arguement for acceptance. Accept only perfect guests and you get less guests, accept imperfect guests and get more action, but with less realism. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catalonia Posted October 1, 2018 Share Posted October 1, 2018 Hace 42 minutos, Amy3 dijo: Solo para que conste, las máscaras hijo anti-voyeurismo. Dicen esto, "Sé que puedes verme, pero no quiero que yo veas, ¡así que me esconderé de ti!". En un entorno de voyeur normal, el voyeur aceptaría que los había visto y que se escabulliría en la oscuridad como un buen pervertido, y que no seguiría dando vueltas como un tonto. Lo sé, lo sé, ¡esto ya no es voyeurismo y debería abandonarlo! Bueno, tal vez un día! Esto coincide con el argumento de groomy para la aceptación. Acepte solo huéspedes perfectos y acepta menos invitados, acepte invitados imperfectos y obtenga más acción, pero con menos realismo. This is a business, nothing else, everything else is only in our heads dear Amy, it's like magic, you may like it, but what you see is a trick. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabbath1987 Posted October 1, 2018 Author Share Posted October 1, 2018 48 minutes ago, Amy3 said: Just for the record, masks are anti-voyeurism. They say this, "I know you can see me, but I don't want you to see me, so I'm going to hide from you!". In a normal voyeur setting, the voyeur would accept that they have been spotted and would proceed to slink away into the darkness like a good pervert, not continue to stck around like a fool. I know, I know, this isn't voyeurism any more and I should just give it up! Oh well, maybe one day! This falls in line with groomy's arguement for acceptance. Accept only perfect guests and you get less guests, accept imperfect guests and get more action, but with less realism. I don't like this stupid masks at all. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy3 Posted October 1, 2018 Share Posted October 1, 2018 2 minutes ago, catalonia said: This is a business, nothing else, everything else is only in our heads dear Amy, it's like magic, you may like it, but what you see is a trick. ....and here I thought the idea of a Voyeur House, was supposed to voyeurism. How foolish of me! VHTV crushed the fly on the wall with a wad of cash, I know. It's all a show. Each tenant has to decide just how much of a show they want their apt to be. I use a scale, 1-10, with a 1 being a tenant living as if the cams did not existn and a 10 being porn. Each place can be gauged on this scale. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts