SierraTM Posted February 16, 2020 Posted February 16, 2020 il y a 2 minutes, Hornygirl a dit : Would you consider the TV show "Big Brother" and similar to be pornography? What they show, at least in parts of the world where the editing is less strict, is little different from much of what you see on RLC - you see naked people showering, people masturbating, people having sex, yet it is shown on TV channels that would certainly not show pornography. I would argue the only difference with RLC is we are seeing the raw feed rather that what an editor has chosen to shown us, and I watch it for the same reason I watch those programs, as an interesting sociological exercise that sometimes produces arousing moments, most certainly not as porn. Big Brother is not pornography. It is a reality competition on mainstream TV which voters can decide who to keep or kick on every few rounds. This content is unique because in some countries, it is heavily inducted with sexual content to keep some audience interested while in other countries like the UK and or US, the sexual content is censored or the cameras will move away if they think an accidental nudity was incoming. Big Brother is just another version of reality TV, with celebrity participants or model participants, which the general audience can accept and watch on mainstream TV to a certain extent. The main pull of Big Brother is actually how the contestants live with each other on set, make alliance and try to outplay each other so that they can avoid being voted off. Sometimes for the female participants, being willingly sexual on set will help their cause. Comparing RLC to Big Brother is kinda rough for me. In fact, it is quite unfair to label them as pornography I think.
Hornygirl Posted February 16, 2020 Posted February 16, 2020 4 minutes ago, SierraTM said: Big Brother is not pornography. It is a reality competition on mainstream TV which voters can decide who to keep or kick on every few rounds. This content is unique because in some countries, it is heavily inducted with sexual content to keep some audience interested while in other countries like the UK and or US, the sexual content is censored or the cameras will move away if they think an accidental nudity was incoming. Big Brother is just another version of reality TV, with celebrity participants or model participants, which the general audience can accept and watch on mainstream TV to a certain extent. The main pull of Big Brother is actually how the contestants live with each other on set, make alliance and try to outplay each other so that they can avoid being voted off. Sometimes for the female participants, being willingly sexual on set will help their cause. Comparing RLC to Big Brother is kinda rough for me. In fact, it is quite unfair to label them as pornography I think. I wouldn't label them as pornography either, my point is that your description there, thinking of parts of the world where they censor less, is not that different from RLC with the exception of the public voting being replaced with bonuses. For me RLC is much closer to reality TV than pornography. 3
SierraTM Posted February 16, 2020 Posted February 16, 2020 il y a 3 minutes, moos54 a dit : Objectively, tell me what did Alla do during her first month in the project? I can tell you, nothing much more than what Cindy did, however you consider Cindy to be a do nothing but not Alla, I think your cursor is not really calibrate well I think it is pointless to argue on with you, just like previously, you are always insistent that you are always correct. If I as a fucking whiner can tell you Alla, whom I whined about, was better than Cindy, I believe I have no logical sense to contradict myself that bad right now. Alla was weird, that is the furthest you can criticise her in her first month. She delivered her 'sexual content' while hiding from the cameras. Cindy delivers nothing of such. All Cindy delivers is that she is consistently making good use of the space in the kitchen and in the living room.
SierraTM Posted February 16, 2020 Posted February 16, 2020 il y a 1 minute, Hornygirl a dit : I wouldn't label them as pornography either, my point is that your description there, thinking of parts of the world where they censor less, is not that different from RLC with the exception of the public voting. For me RLC is much closer to reality TV than pornography. This can't be because if you consider Big Brother to be reality TV, than RLC is reality pornography. This is the logical association if we follow your logic.
moos54 Posted February 16, 2020 Posted February 16, 2020 3 minutes ago, SierraTM said: Big Brother is not pornography. are you really sure about that? the cameras are not hidden either as compared to RLC and if you do a google search for videos of Big Brother, I think you will find more on porn sites than those of RLC 2
SierraTM Posted February 16, 2020 Posted February 16, 2020 il y a 2 minutes, moos54 a dit : are you really sure about that? the cameras are not hidden either as compared to RLC and if you do a google search for videos of Big Brother, I think you will find more on porn sites than those of RLC Please read my whole comment and not just take what you want to make fun of. Please do not be like Trump. The videos are found on sites because they don't clamp down on them like RLC does. Even Russian forums have limited amount of RLC videos.
Hornygirl Posted February 16, 2020 Posted February 16, 2020 3 minutes ago, SierraTM said: This can't be because if you consider Big Brother to be reality TV, than RLC is reality pornography. This is the logical association if we follow your logic. No. If we follow my logic RLC is also reality TV, just uncensored. 1
moos54 Posted February 16, 2020 Posted February 16, 2020 5 minutes ago, SierraTM said: I think it is pointless to argue on with you, just like previously, you are always insistent that you are always correct. If I as a fucking whiner can tell you Alla, whom I whined about, was better than Cindy, I believe I have no logical sense to contradict myself that bad right now. Alla was weird, that is the furthest you can criticise her in her first month. She delivered her 'sexual content' while hiding from the cameras. Cindy delivers nothing of such. All Cindy delivers is that she is consistently making good use of the space in the kitchen and in the living room. that's what I say, your do nothing cursor is very poorly calibrate 1
SierraTM Posted February 16, 2020 Posted February 16, 2020 (edited) il y a 6 minutes, Hornygirl a dit : No. If we follow my logic RLC is also reality TV, just uncensored. No, in some countries, their contestants are not allowed to have sex on TV. And RLC's tenants are not contestants. They don't compete on anything and don't have to 'survive' as such. They can rot on the bed all day and get paid. Which might be what you want the tenants to do. Edit: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/love-island/index.html This is real reality TV, where what happens on set will lead on to real life and heavily reported on tabloids. Please do not compare what is on RLC to reality TV shows like Big Brother or Love Island. People can die after competing in the competition, people's lives can be messed up after joining the competition. In RLC, we don't see that. In fact, the girls come back one after another and make their euros happily. They hide their personal info and RLC help them to hide it unless you manage to chance on their social media accounts. Edited February 16, 2020 by SierraTM edit: add on
Alladino Posted February 16, 2020 Posted February 16, 2020 36 minutes ago, Hornygirl said: If by "Real life" you mean what the girls would be doing if they hadn't been flown across Europe and paid to be in a house with cameras then of course it isn't real life. But I believe we get a very real and interesting view into how a group of girls, many of whom are strangers to each other, are thrown into a house together to negotiate all those interactions with the added aspect of knowing they are being viewed around the world. As long as they are real people interacting and not acting a script - and I don't want to get side tracked into how much input RLC has to what they do - then that is real life and as a voyeur I love it. You should have discarded this fantasy at the latest when hardly a week passes without the girls dancing half-naked on the tables with bunny ears or or angel wings. GOV is currently nothing more than a bunch of girls who are paid to pretend to be lesbians and to hold their genitals into the camera as often as possible. If you really think that GOV is worth anything in terms of voyuerism you really have to open your eyes. GOV is nothing else than a cheap show without real content featuring a group of girls who don't give a shit about the Viewers. They want to make as much money as they can as simply as possible. 1
Hornygirl Posted February 16, 2020 Posted February 16, 2020 7 minutes ago, SierraTM said: No, in some countries, their contestants are not allowed to have sex on TV. Hence my comment about how RLC is the uncensored version!
SierraTM Posted February 16, 2020 Posted February 16, 2020 il y a 1 minute, Hornygirl a dit : Hence my comment about how RLC is the uncensored version! No either you are getting me wrong or you are redacting my comment and using what is useful to you. Since in some countries, their contestants are not allowed to have sex on TV nor masturbate on TV, they are not the censored version of RLC because the show is not intended to show sexual content! These shows are competitions and allow public voting. They are what they are, and RLC is a pornography website. And in some seasons of Big Brother UK, there isn't any nudity or censored nudity and viewership remain relatively high because of the celebrity/model contestants. We are not comparing apple with apple.
Recommended Posts