B4 Girls on Vacation - General Topic 2020 #4 (February)

[ed2]

10 minutes ago, Alladino said:

 

What I find so unfortunate about your position is that you do not realize that our views are not contradictory. There would also be sexual content if the Girls would really lived there, all without any show. Sure, you need a little patience and sometime nothing will happen, but a more realistic approach also has would give more excitement than these superficial shows without any emotion and without any life. 

Some girls from the past were much more involved here. Especially girls like Sara and Stella, but also Nicole were perfect. This Apartments Need more guys, that would be a first step. 

And more girls like Elettra!!!

[moos54]

13 minutes ago, ed2 said:

Alla masturbated under covers, in the bath, and showed more nudity earlier on. I love when they share atleast some degree of intimacy with us. For example Dana, she gave more to me than Cindy has done yet. Even though Cindy has likely given us much more time already in sexy underwear and nice clothes, and her exercising almost every day, it lacks these tiny moments of intimacy that Alla or Dana shared with us. I guess it all depends on what we like more.

Yes she did all this but not in the first month, moreover I am almost certain that he was complaining about her too at that time

Otherwise for Cindy, you just described a person who for me does not fit into the definition of a do nothing girl
Thank you for confirming it

[Alladino]

37 minutes ago, ed2 said:

And more girls like Elettra!!!

Yes, of Course also Elettra, 😀 It is important that there are no shows and that we get an insight into the lives of the residents.

[ed2]

7 minutes ago, moos54 said:

Yes she did all this but not in the first month, moreover I am almost certain that he was complaining about her too at that time

Otherwise for Cindy, you just described a person who for me does not fit into the definition of a do nothing girl
Thank you for confirming it

As I explained, it depends on what we define as "doing something". Many would definitely call Dana a do-nothing-girl, always wearing that flimsy pyjamas, but I loved her little sneaky masturbations. On the other hand, I would likely say that Cindy did nothing, while others would put emphasis on the fact that she exercised and was topless quite abit. It depends on our point of view..... You are wrong about Alla though, she masturbated well within one month. She arrived on 24.9, I have a recording where she masturbated on 17.10.

[SierraTM]

il y a 6 minutes, ed2 a dit :

As I explained, it depends on what we define as "doing something". Many would definitely call Dana a do-nothing-girl, always wearing that flimsy pyjamas, but I loved her little sneaky masturbations. On the other hand, I would likely say that Cindy did nothing, while others would put emphasis on the fact that she exercised and was topless quite abit. It depends on our point of view..... You are wrong about Alla though, she masturbated well within one month. She arrived on 24.9, I have a recording where she masturbated on 17.10.

Allow me to add on, she bated undercover on the 5th, 6th & 7th of Oct.

I remember clearly because I did ask RLC if they think it was alright for Alla to keep on doing what she did.

To RLC's credit, Alla had a turnaround & of cos the rest was history.

[omedo]

Después de una semana parece que Joy se ha decidido a vaciar sus maletas...😉

[ed2]

2 minutes ago, SierraTM said:

Allow me to add on, she bated undercover on the 5th, 6th & 7th of Oct.

Yes, I thought it happened much earlier, but my first recording was from the 17th. Likely because it was more open by then. I honestly don't think that's bad, we ought to give them some time to adapt and open up. On RLC it seems they give girls one month at a time, if there haven't been much sign of progress, I mean doing anything more than showers, I don't think it's unreasonable to not renew them for another month. Anyway, that's how RLC is operating these days. An issue though, is the tenants don't seem to be informed what is to be expected beforehand. We have even had a few newbies who were shocked that they had to take showers/baths naked.

[Tamme Klaas]

Today's comments on the girls:

Apparently you don't just need the timekeeper,
Another one has to take the lead in the masturbation table.

For a while there has been a girl or two missing from the house who can create the mood, the rest comes on its own.
We had nice events and scenes in the house.
Happy parties again, also with men as guests,
From me also with the 'RLC set'

[timber]

5 hours ago, Tamme Klaas said:

For a while there has been a girl or two missing from the house who can create the mood, the rest comes on its own.

This is the main thing for me. These apartments work alright when they have someone who can turn them into a fun place instead of just a house full of girls isolated in their rooms. That's the characteristic I think RLC should prioritize in determining which girls get brought back.

If the apartment is actually fun and they're having semi-real parties where people are getting drunk and interacting, then the chances of seeing interesting things go up for every tenant there. But if it's just forced awkward events where everyone is clearly counting the time until they can leave, then it's going to be dreary for the viewers and the participants. I don't think it's an easy thing, it requires someone who both wants to do it and has the charisma to get other girls to buy in. Damira's a good example, and there have been a few others.

Unfortunately RLC instead seems to favor bringing back the girls who give reliable shows regardless of their impact on the overall apartment atmosphere. So all too frequently we get the Blairs and Monicas of the world, who will perform their routine but contribute very little to making the apartments fun (in Blair's case I'd say she often actively detracts from it). And those girls frequently seem to stay forever.

[bud2966]

15 minutes ago, timber said:

This is the main thing for me. These apartments work alright when they have someone who can turn them into a fun place instead of just a house full of girls isolated in their rooms. That's the characteristic I think RLC should prioritize in determining which girls get brought back.

If the apartment is actually fun and they're having real parties where people are getting drunk and interacting, then the chances of seeing interesting things go up for every tenant there. But if it's just forced awkward events where everyone is clearly counting the time until they can leave, then it's going to be dreary for the viewers and the participants. I don't think it's an easy thing, it requires someone who both wants to do it and has the charisma to get other girls to buy in. Damira's a good example, and there have been a few others.

Unfortunately RLC instead seems to favor bringing back the girls who give reliable shows regardless of their impact on the overall apartment atmosphere. So all too frequently we get the Blairs and Monicas of the world, who will perform their routine but contribute very little to making the apartments fun (in Blair's case I'd say she often actively detracts from it). And those girls frequently seem to stay forever.

AND IN MONIA'S STAY THIS TIME. SHE SHOULD HAVE BEEN BOOTED OUT AFTER 30 DAYS...SHE IS ONLY HERE TO MAKE RLC MONEY AND HERSELF .MONEY FOR WHAT SHE DOES OUTSIDE THE RLC APT..AND SORRY LITTLE NAGA AND THE STARRIDER .BUT JUST TAKE AND LOOK AT ALL THE TIME SHE IS OUT OF THE APT.😏...AND DO YOU REALLY THINK SHE IS PUTTING ON THE SAME SHOW OUT OF THE APT ..AS SHE DOES IN THE APT.LIKE MAKING SURE THAT SHE HAS THE SOFIE ROBE ON TO HIDE ...🤔

[jjkopite]

11 hours ago, Hornygirl said:

I wouldn't label them as pornography either, my point is that your description there, thinking of parts of the world where they censor less, is not that different from RLC with the exception of the public voting being replaced with bonuses. For me RLC is much closer to reality TV than pornography. 

Big Brother doesn't charge $45 per month to watch and doesn't allow a contestant/participant on the show more than once, also BB is rigorously controlled/censored in what they can show in most countries around the world so I would say there is very little comparison between a porn site like RLC and reality shows like BB. If you want to compare RLC with other so-called Voyeur sites like VHTV, Camarads, Voyeur-Villa etc.that would be a better comparison and match up for content.

[corvette08]

39 minutes ago, jjkopite said:

Big Brother doesn't charge $45 per month to watch and doesn't allow a contestant/participant on the show more than once, also BB is rigorously controlled/censored in what they can show in most countries around the world so I would say there is very little comparison between a porn site like RLC and reality shows like BB. If you want to compare RLC with other so-called Voyeur sites like VHTV, Camarads, Voyeur-Villa etc.that would be a better comparison and match up for content.

Big Brother in the US brings back the same players all the time. So much like RLC.