Say what!

[bigbear]

I used to run an adult forum, many years ago. I used pictures in the description fields, to not only enhance the layout, but also to help members know which forum was which. In fact, I was the first person to do this, it soon caught on, and led to the idea of streamong sites.

[StnCld316]

10 hours ago, bigbear said:

I used to run an adult forum, many years ago. I used pictures in the description fields, to not only enhance the layout, but also to help members know which forum was which. In fact, I was the first person to do this, it soon caught on, and led to the idea of streamong sites.

About the only thing I am hearing so far is it does not work to well on Handheld or Mobile Devices.  That's likely because a Handheld or Mobile Device has smaller screens so the image content could be a bit difficult to work around. Where as someone with a PC or a Laptop would not have any issues. Most websites are not very friendly with Handheld or Mobile Devices no matter what layout or format it's presented with. Regardless of what's used it has its advantages and disadvantages. 

We'll see how it goes and how well its received over the course of a month or two. 

[bigbear]

I hope it does, mate.

[dougiestyle4u]

Gotta laugh at members here on camcaps, on xcamfan and on VHTV Forum that refuse to accept the fact that these voyeur cam sites ARE porn sites FFS!!! No children under 18 years of age are allowed to be on cam, all kinds of nudity plus sex, masturbation and other adult content. Porn is porn no matter how you slice it. These voyeur cam sites are not PG rated or for children to view (funny though how some members behave like children in these forums). These voyeur cam sites are not like all the porn sites as we know it but normal, fake or intentional nudity and sex in front of obvious cameras is fucking porn. It may not be 24/7 porn but with the use of cams it provides the viewers to watch participants do their daily activities which could include nudity and sex. This is the same as members thinking that all these voyeur cam sites have participants living their "real life" in front of the cams - haha. Perhaps some resemblance of their real life but since the participants obviously know that the cams are there they will, at times, provide fake or intentional activities to satisfy the paid subscribers and viewers.

So if you want to look at it - these voyeur cam sites provide real/fake/intentional adult porn type activities.

[TBG 150]

There are a few of us that know this. The rest of the dweebs are living in a fantasy world.

[dougiestyle4u]

5 minutes ago, TBG 150 said:

The rest of the dweebs are living in a fantasy world.

Got that right and they try to set us straight or tell us to go check out porn sites instead - them dumb fucks.

[TBG 150]

I have no desire to look at a bunch of skanks covered in tattoos.

[ARMY SNIPER]

On 4/26/2023 at 3:00 AM, TBG 150 said:

I have no desire to look at a bunch of skanks covered in tattoos.

Me either Big Guy,whatever happened to all the naturally pretty girl's .( i don't look at the skank's either )

[bigbear]

Today I looked at this, which I normally just click off. These guys are nuts to think that people are going to pay $10 for just 5 days of junk! I mean, come on! 5 days that's $730 for a years subscription, if they do it this way.. 

 

[StnCld316]

11 hours ago, bigbear said:

Today I looked at this, which I normally just click off. These guys are nuts to think that people are going to pay $10 for just 5 days of junk! I mean, come on! 5 days that's $730 for a years subscription, if they do it this way.. 

 

I'll think they'll find they only get the $9.95 once. After that they pay regular price. There are ways to skirt it and that's change your IP Address and e-Mail addy every 5 days.

[bigbear]

41 minutes ago, StnCld316 said:

I'll think they'll find they only get the $9.95 once. After that they pay regular price. There are ways to skirt it and that's change your IP Address and e-Mail addy every 5 days.

Never gonna happen, mate.

[bigbear]

Whoah! I think they are breaking the rules over at RLC. Def a breach of privacy, in my opinion. What do you guys and gals think?

(Content No longer Available)