TfiDeano Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 4 minutes ago, p4design said: I don't think you realize, you're the odd one here. The vast majority of subscribers are here to watch people have sex and when there is very little of that happening it is "in fact" a problem. It's like paying for a buffet only to find there's very little food. You clearly misread my comment and missed out the vital parts, so I will say this again like I have said in the past. As a subscriber you are entitled to one thing, and one thing only...visual access to the apartments via recording equipment. The participants are not sheep nor are they other animals on display for your sexual gratification, and they DO NOT have to have sex on cam just because you pay $45 each month. They allow us as viewers to watch them do whatever they do or don't do in their homes whilst being part of the project. What's even more real with the project is if people on cam want to have sex under covers then they can, which makes it 'real life' and all the more real, unlike a porn site. I am happy to disagree with what you said as you are with my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p4design Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 29 minutes ago, TfiDeano said: You clearly misread my comment and missed out the vital parts, so I will say this again like I have said in the past. As a subscriber you are entitled to one thing, and one thing only...visual access to the apartments via recording equipment. The participants are not sheep nor are they other animals on display for your sexual gratification, and they DO NOT have to have sex on cam just because you pay $45 each month. They allow us as viewers to watch them do whatever they do or don't do in their homes whilst being part of the project. What's even more real with the project is if people on cam want to have sex under covers then they can, which makes it 'real life' and all the more real, unlike a porn site. I am happy to disagree with what you said as you are with my opinion. Really? I'm incredulous that this is what you think about this site. What kind of delusion are you under? This is not real life or some scientific project where these people are generously allowing us to view their lives. This is a porn site and these people are paid performers and are there for a specific purpose, namely to have sex in a staged "real life" setting to satisfy the voyeuristic desires of those who subscribe. knowing full well the reality of what I've just stated, I am willing to suspend disbelief in order to derive that pleasure. If you are here for some other reason, you are truly the odd one. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxbell Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 1 hour ago, p4design said: I don't think you realize, you're the odd one here. The vast majority of subscribers are here to watch people have sex and when there is very little of that happening it is "in fact" a problem. It's like paying for a buffet only to find there's very little food. The way I think of it sometimes is that we pay their wages so us subscribers are actually their employers after-all. 🤣 When we say “dance” , they should dance !! 🤣 I'm not really that way but it is a different way to look at it 🤭 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TfiDeano Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 4 minutes ago, p4design said: Really? I'm incredulous that this is what you think about this site. What kind of delusion are you under? This is not real life or some scientific project where these people are generously allowing us to view their lives. This is a porn site and these people are paid performers and are there for a specific purpose, namely to have sex in a staged "real life" setting to satisfy the voyeuristic desires of those who subscribe. knowing full well the reality of what I've just stated, I am willing to suspend disbelief in order to derive that pleasure. If you are here for some other reason, you are truly the odd one. Stop being braindead and realise I am right, whether I am the odd one out or not. I may as well speak to a tin of beans than a troll which is what you are. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melle2 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 It is difficult to accept a single opinion from yours. From the outside, RLC should be a voyeur site. Male voyeurs, I don't know if there are female voyeurs, want to see women in all kinds of activities in which nudity and sex are important aspects. I have to admit that I get bored of the couples' actions after a while. I no longer watch the same old acts of masturbation and copulation by Dasha and Sasha, Amalia and Mati, Barbie and Ken or Leora's actions. Every day is the same here. If you've seen one, you know them all. Ok, it's nice to see Leore in her tight pants, but for me too little happens. Voyeurs probably don't get their money's worth, as there are too many areas that don't have cameras and many actors hide whenever possible. Above all, I lack an understanding of the meaning of the actions. I don't have the right language so that I can trace actions back to the statements of those involved. For me, the whole thing is more of an uncensored kind of Big Brother, which existed in many countries in Europe. But at BB the conversations were important. At RLC you have to make up the stories. In the houses you can see many tenants writing and receiving text messages all day long. What is a viewer supposed to do with this? It's just boring. In this respect, I understand the desire for action. It's definitely helpful to have this forum here, then you'll find out about things you've missed. Who has time to spend all day in front of a computer or tablet? Conclusion: It would be important to have tenants who are prepared to have everything that is part of a normal life, more cameras and a different colloquial language, but who is supposed to provide all of that? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p4design Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 6 minutes ago, TfiDeano said: Stop being braindead and realise I am right, whether I am the odd one out or not. I may as well speak to a tin of beans than a troll which is what you are. Lacking a legitimate reply, you resort to insults. There is nothing for me to realize. You couldn't be more wrong about RLC. Regarding your troll comment, a troll would normally be defined as someone who baits others into an argument for the pleasure of getting an emotional response, but I didn't start this discussion and I'm not baiting you. I simply responded to statements you have made that I consider erroneous. This is a porn site, like it or not. The people living in the apartments are paid and you as well as all subscribers are the ones paying them. (I pay far less than $45 a month, so perhaps you should consider different payment plan). 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alladino Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 1 hour ago, TfiDeano said: You clearly misread my comment and missed out the vital parts, so I will say this again like I have said in the past. As a subscriber you are entitled to one thing, and one thing only...visual access to the apartments via recording equipment. The participants are not sheep nor are they other animals on display for your sexual gratification, and they DO NOT have to have sex on cam just because you pay $45 each month. They allow us as viewers to watch them do whatever they do or don't do in their homes whilst being part of the project. What's even more real with the project is if people on cam want to have sex under covers then they can, which makes it 'real life' and all the more real, unlike a porn site. I am happy to disagree with what you said as you are with my opinion. Look at the whole thing from another direction. Most of the popular scenes on RLC are about sex (or at least explicit nudity). That's no coincidence. This kind of content, is not an extra, it's why people are willing to pay. Of course you can say that none of the residents have to do anything, and I agree with. But, at the same time, it should be clear to you that none of RLC's customers can be forced to continue paying. If there is nothing more to see, then people simply stop being interested and spend their money elsewhere. One problem I have with the do nothing girls is that they live like parasites off the people who are actually involved in the project. In addition, it's disappointing when some of the girls who are there for months do absolutely nothing (not even masturbating). The impression is not one of getting a glimpse into private life, but the certainty that the private life is deliberately kept away from the camera. That makes no sense, and therefore I think RLC is well advised to get rid of do nothing girls as soon as possible. Not a must, but a should. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TfiDeano Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 21 minutes ago, p4design said: Lacking a legitimate reply, you resort to insults. There is nothing for me to realize. You couldn't be more wrong about RLC. Regarding your troll comment, a troll would normally be defined as someone who baits others into an argument for the pleasure of getting an emotional response, but I didn't start this discussion and I'm not baiting you. I simply responded to statements you have made that I consider erroneous. This is a porn site, like it or not. The people living in the apartments are paid and you as well as all subscribers are the ones paying them. (I pay far less than $45 a month, so perhaps you should consider different payment plan). If it's a porn site then why do 'many' people here spend time following the lives of these people and following stories and events. If you want a quick wank then go to Pornhub which is clearly where you should be looking, RLC is not a porn site...fact, and end of. I don't even know why this is being discussed because you have your brainwashed beliefs and let's say I have mine. You are worth less to me that the pile of dog shit I step in on the floor. If you are so concerned about spending $45 a month every month then save it and get a real bitch in to fuck instead of criticising people on here what you believe in. Does it honestly really matter what it is apart from being a voyeur site, no...so take your warped and brainwashed arse elsewhere. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slow Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 il y a 6 minutes, Alladino a dit : Look at the whole thing from another direction. Most of the popular scenes on RLC are about sex (or at least explicit nudity). That's no coincidence. This kind of content, is not an extra, it's why people are willing to pay. Of course you can say that none of the residents have to do anything, and I agree with. But, at the same time, it should be clear to you that none of RLC's customers can be forced to continue paying. If there is nothing more to see, then people simply stop being interested and spend their money elsewhere. One problem I have with the do nothing girls is that they live like parasites off the people who are actually involved in the project. In addition, it's disappointing when some of the girls who are there for months do absolutely nothing (not even masturbating). The impression is not one of getting a glimpse into private life, but the certainty that the private life is deliberately kept away from the camera. That makes no sense, and therefore I think RLC is well advised to get rid of do nothing girls as soon as possible. Not a must, but a should. I may add ... since I do not understand a single word of Russian/Ukrainian and I do not want to spend my time trying to implement some sort of automatic translation, the only thing interesting left is explicit nudity in all its different forms. This explains the success of Octavia for example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TfiDeano Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 11 minutes ago, Alladino said: Look at the whole thing from another direction. Most of the popular scenes on RLC are about sex (or at least explicit nudity). That's no coincidence. This kind of content, is not an extra, it's why people are willing to pay. Of course you can say that none of the residents have to do anything, and I agree with. But, at the same time, it should be clear to you that none of RLC's customers can be forced to continue paying. If there is nothing more to see, then people simply stop being interested and spend their money elsewhere. One problem I have with the do nothing girls is that they live like parasites off the people who are actually involved in the project. In addition, it's disappointing when some of the girls who are there for months do absolutely nothing (not even masturbating). The impression is not one of getting a glimpse into private life, but the certainty that the private life is deliberately kept away from the camera. That makes no sense, and therefore I think RLC is well advised to get rid of do nothing girls as soon as possible. Not a must, but a should. Sex scenes of any sort will always win and be top cams...it's natural to be a voyeur and watch which is exactly what this site is for...to watch the private lives of real people with whatever they are doing. RLC caters for me as I am a people watcher and it's a bonus if and when I get to see them have sex which in fairness is a private event for most people and these tenants have the freedom to have sex or not have sex, it doesn't stop me from scribing. Someone said I'm the odd one out to believe this is not a porn site lol. What's odd is these people PAY to watch someone else have sex instead of getting their own woman to fuck...laughable. RLC is voyeur...simple as...in my opinion anyway. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melle2 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 29 minutes ago, TfiDeano said: If it's a porn site then why do 'many' people here spend time following the lives of these people and following stories and events. If you want a quick wank then go to Pornhub which is clearly where you should be looking, RLC is not a porn site...fact, and end of. I don't even know why this is being discussed because you have your brainwashed beliefs and let's say I have mine. You are worth less to me that the pile of dog shit I step in on the floor. If you are so concerned about spending $45 a month every month then save it and get a real bitch in to fuck instead of criticising people on here what you believe in. Does it honestly really matter what it is apart from being a voyeur site, no...so take your warped and brainwashed arse elsewhere. I recommend refraining from insults, otherwise we'll be back to hatred. RLC is not a porn site, the sex is too bad and the camera settings are bad too, but it is also not a site for voyeurs, as the behavior of the tenants prevents this. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alladino Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 10 minutes ago, TfiDeano said: Sex scenes of any sort will always win and be top cams...it's natural to be a voyeur and watch which is exactly what this site is for...to watch the private lives of real people with whatever they are doing. RLC caters for me as I am a people watcher and it's a bonus if and when I get to see them have sex which in fairness is a private event for most people and these tenants have the freedom to have sex or not have sex, it doesn't stop me from scribing. Someone said I'm the odd one out to believe this is not a porn site lol. What's odd is these people PAY to watch someone else have sex instead of getting their own woman to fuck...laughable. RLC is voyeur...simple as...in my opinion anyway. I think, nobody here doubts that RLC provides an insight into the private lives of most (or at least some) of the residents. But that in no way excludes the fact that RLC is ultimately to be regarded as pornographic. The two are not mutually exclusive. Also, the fact that residents decide when and how to have sex does not mean that it is not pornographic. Again, The two are not mutually exclusive. The point is that RLC wouldn't exist without the paying viewers, and for them the sexual action to be seen is the main argument for paying so much money. I don't know why this is so hard for you to accept, but without sex, there would be no RLC. The rest of your comment is just presumptuous. At least I have no problem with being a voyeur. On RLC there is a place where I can live this out without coming into conflict with the law. I see no issue with that. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts