Alladino Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 5 minutes ago, Melle2 said: I recommend refraining from insults, otherwise we'll be back to hatred. RLC is not a porn site, the sex is too bad and the camera settings are bad too, but it is also not a site for voyeurs, as the behavior of the tenants prevents this. Please, Read through the definition of porn at least once, before you write something like that. High image quality is not a condition for pornography. The fact that some residents don't really participate in the project doesn't make the value that the other residents provide any less. RLC is porn, but, in giving a view into the private life (of most or at least part of the residents), also more than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mauri Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 8 minuti fa, Alladino ha detto: Penso che nessuno qui dubiti che RLC fornisca uno spaccato della vita privata della maggior parte (o almeno di alcuni) dei residenti. Ma ciò non esclude affatto che RLC in definitiva debba essere considerato pornografico. Le due cose non si escludono una vicenda. Inoltre, il fatto che siano i residenti a decidere quando e come fare sesso non significa che non sia pornografico. Ancora una volta, i due non si escludono una vicenda. Il punto è che RLC non esisterebbe senza gli spettatori paganti, e per loro l'azione sessuale da vedere è l'argomento principale da pagare così tanti soldi. Non so perché sia così difficile per te da accettare, ma senza il sesso non ci sarebbe RLC. Il resto del tuo commento è semplicemente presuntuoso. Almeno non ho problemi a essere un voyeur. Su RLC c'è un posto dove posso vivere tutto questo senza entrare in conflitto con la legge. Non vedo alcun problema con questo. RLC e' andato avanti per anni e non c'era cosi tanto sesso, semplicemente perche’ non serve solo fare sesso per avere visualizzazioni 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melle2 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 3 minutes ago, Alladino said: Please, Read through the definition of porn at least once, before you write something like that. High image quality is not a condition for pornography. The fact that some residents don't really participate in the project doesn't make the value that the other residents provide any less. RLC is porn, but, in giving a view into the private life (of most or at least part of the residents), also more than that. Ok, I correct myself. RLC is not always a porn site, but pornographic content is shown, even if it is not of particularly high quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alladino Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 Just now, Mauri said: RLC went on for years and there wasn't as much sex I've known RLC for some time now, and all that time there was sex to be seen. Maybe not as much as today, but not at all. Ultimately, without sex, RLC would be finished. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TfiDeano Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 3 minutes ago, Alladino said: I think, nobody here doubts that RLC provides an insight into the private lives of most (or at least some) of the residents. But that in no way excludes the fact that RLC is ultimately to be regarded as pornographic. The two are not mutually exclusive. Also, the fact that residents decide when and how to have sex does not mean that it is not pornographic. Again, The two are not mutually exclusive. The point is that RLC wouldn't exist without the paying viewers, and for them the sexual action to be seen is the main argument for paying so much money. I don't know why this is so hard for you to accept, but without sex, there would be no RLC. The rest of your comment is just presumptuous. At least I have no problem with being a voyeur. On RLC there is a place where I can live this out without coming into conflict with the law. I see no issue with that. It's a voyeur site, get over it. Based on what you have said then CNN and Youtube both show 'real life' video's of killings...so I guess they are 'hunting' websites. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daerjohn2015 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 5 hours ago, darcher111 said: Het is zeker een probleem. Neem iets mee naar het project om je plek te behouden. Sara was haar houdbaarheidsdatum ver voorbij en had al maanden geleden moeten verdwijnen Numi - saai. Karma - wat er gezegd moet worden. Een van de volgers van het leven. Zodra Chris opduikt, is ze niet meer aanwezig. Wat betreft de 2 nieuwe K+A absoluut verschrikkelijke afspraken. Medusa moet terug naar Italië Wat B7 betreft, dat zou gewoon moeten worden afgesloten. Betaal je geld voor een abonnement, dan krijg je waar voor je geld. Dit is verre van 45 euro per maand waard. Ik zorg ervoor dat mensen graag kijken, maar voor mij is het verre van de moeite waard wat ze vragen. De meningen verschillen, maar ik denk dat meer mensen het met mij eens zullen zijn dan jij dat RLC de kosten waard is. Hoe dan ook, het is vandaag hun betaaldag, dus ik kijk uit naar de tassen van Zara en Primark waar ze zo hard voor hebben gewerkt. Fijne dag vriend 54 euro per maand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melle2 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 3 minutes ago, Alladino said: I've known RLC for some time now, and all that time there was sex to be seen. Maybe not as much as today, but not at all. Ultimately, without sex, RLC would be finished. I agree: without sex, RLC would be at an end, but a voyeur is also interested in other things. If you're only interested in sex, there are better sites. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p4design Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 20 minutes ago, TfiDeano said: If it's a porn site then why do 'many' people here spend time following the lives of these people and following stories and events. If you want a quick wank then go to Pornhub which is clearly where you should be looking, RLC is not a porn site...fact, and end of. I don't even know why this is being discussed because you have your brainwashed beliefs and let's say I have mine. You are worth less to me that the pile of dog shit I step in on the floor. If you are so concerned about spending $45 a month every month then save it and get a real bitch in to fuck instead of criticising people on here what you believe in. Does it honestly really matter what it is apart from being a voyeur site, no...so take your warped and brainwashed arse elsewhere. More insults. I haven't purposely insulted you, though obviously you feel insulted. I was trying to have a reasoned discussion, but you are clearly unprepared to do so. Regardless, I will respond to the comments you made at the beginning of your post. First, I am a voyeur. I derive pleasure from viewing people having sex in organic normal life situations. Pornhub does not adequately provide that, while RLC does. Look at who they hire to live in their apartments. Many of them are exotic dancers, live stream sex workers, and their have even been prostitutes who have been heard talking on the phone giving prices to potential customers for sexual services. Masha has been heard explaining the situation to a sex partner, acknowledging that she is paid to have cameras in the apartment. Look at the preview scenes that they choose to display to entice you to view. The scenes are almost always of people engaged in some sort of sexual activity or bathing or walking around nude. RLC is undoubtedly a porn site and you are deluding yourself if you think otherwise. You have posted critical statements regarding those who wish to see more sex on RLC, therefore it is legitimate for more to respond with a differing opinion. And by the way, I'm married and my wife and I have an active sex life. But that does not negate my voyeuristic desires. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mauri Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 2 minutes ago, Alladino said: Conosco RLC ormai da un po' di tempo e per tutto quel tempo c'era stato sesso da vedere. Magari non tanto quanto oggi, ma per niente. Alla fine, senza il sesso, RLC sarebbe finita. Conosco RLC dal suo origine, e non mi risulta di aver mai visto in passato, tanto sesso e lo stile delle feste che vediamo oggi con le ville, RLC finira’ quando finira’ internet, perche’ la gente e’ curiosa e si abbonera’ di nuovo, a prescindere da cio’ che succede all’interno degli appartamenti, che gli piaccia o no, e’ una droga, e poi, come ho detto, ci sono molte altre cose da vedere, se si e’ dei veri guardoni, ognuno ha un suo feticcio, non e’ solo una questione di sesso, per quello ci sono molti siti gratis. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alladino Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 2 minutes ago, Melle2 said: I agree: without sex, RLC would be at an end, but a voyeur is also interested in other things. If you're only interested in sex, there are better sites. Where did I say that I'm only interested in sex? Where does the idea that everything must somehow be exclusive come from? Of course, for me, RLC is not just about watching sex. But it would lose its value for me as a voyeur if there was no sex to see. It's about looking into other people's private lives, which also includes sex. Not just the sex, not just everything without sex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TfiDeano Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 1 minute ago, p4design said: More insults. I haven't purposely insulted you, though obviously you feel insulted. I was trying to have a reasoned discussion, but you are clearly unprepared to do so. Regardless, I will respond to the comments you made at the beginning of your post. First, I am a voyeur. I derive pleasure from viewing people having sex in organic normal life situations. Pornhub does not adequately provide that, while RLC does. Look at who they hire to live in their apartments. Many of them are exotic dancers, live stream sex workers, and their have even been prostitutes who have been heard talking on the phone giving prices to potential customers for sexual services. Masha has been heard explaining the situation to a sex partner, acknowledging that she is paid to have cameras in the apartment. Look at the preview scenes that they choose to display to entice you to view. The scenes are almost always of people engaged in some sort of sexual activity or bathing or walking around nude. RLC is undoubtedly a porn site and you are deluding yourself if you think otherwise. You have posted critical statements regarding those who wish to see more sex on RLC, therefore it is legitimate for more to respond with a differing opinion. And by the way, I'm married and my wife and I have an active sex life. But that does not negate my voyeuristic desires. Okay I apologise, but my opinion 'which is all it is after all' will not change, and so neither will the opinions of those who believe RLC is a porn site. It really makes little difference to me what it is, and this argument does the rounds every so often on the SAME topic...porn or voyeur. The fact is voyeur is a type of porn, but RLC is a voyeur site and the viewers can choose how they view the site and what for. Pornhub/Bang Bus/Fake Taxi are porn sites purely for the viewer to bash the bishop/choke the chicken/spank the money. I have never known a pornsite where viewers discuss events such as parties at B4 & B7 for hours on end...very strange. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melle2 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 1 minute ago, Alladino said: Where did I say that I'm only interested in sex? Where does the idea that everything must somehow be exclusive come from? Of course, for me, RLC is not just about watching sex. But it would lose its value for me as a voyeur if there was no sex to see. It's about looking into other people's private lives, which also includes sex. Not just the sex, not just everything without sex. I agree again, I didn't mean you directly, but everyone who wants to see sex life. Stay calm, we actually mean the same thing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts