Timewarp Posted October 3, 2015 Posted October 3, 2015 That would be awesome. I will probably be off and sorry to miss it.
telsiz31 Posted October 3, 2015 Posted October 3, 2015 That would be awesome. I will probably be off and sorry to miss it. sex at voronezh apart :)
MrBox Posted October 3, 2015 Posted October 3, 2015 apart1 sex now Are you sure? They had probably simply played. That smells like bull shit. :) If they do a show like that, they should at lest have real sex. Isnt it?
miscvoyeur Posted October 3, 2015 Posted October 3, 2015 Are you sure? They had probably simply played. That smells like bull shit. :) If they do a show like that, they should at lest have real sex. Isnt it? Yes. It is clear that they were having sex under cover.
MrBox Posted October 3, 2015 Posted October 3, 2015 Yes. It is clear that they were having sex under cover. No idea why, but here I am convinced that the two had no sex and just faked the thing. Probably, I am wrong here, but I just do not think, it was real. Sorry. :-\
MrBox Posted October 3, 2015 Posted October 3, 2015 all streams dropped to low quality :no: Only for not paying viewers. I think that's fair.
StnCld316 Posted October 4, 2015 Posted October 4, 2015 Only for not paying viewers. I think that's fair. I'm not a paid member of that site and the site shows I am viewing High Quality.
Timewarp Posted October 4, 2015 Posted October 4, 2015 It has been temporary during the peak hours. They say they are having server issues which should be resolved next week.
phantomcapsnet Posted October 4, 2015 Posted October 4, 2015 It has been temporary during the peak hours. They say they are having server issues which should be resolved next week. In fact voyeur-villa use a very weak efficiency algorithm to compress their video for streaming. The hd stream uses easily 250 KB/S even when there are few movements or night vision. RealLifecam uses 50KB/s stream for a really better quality video stream. In night vision when tenants are sleeping we have between 5 and 25KB/s stream whereas voyeur-villa keep their stream at 200-300kB/s. The reason is Reallifecam use an algortihm where only a little zone of the picture where real motion occurs is sent. Voyeur villa algo doesnt use this optimization and always estimates that all the screen need to be updated and send informations for the whole screen. So if voyeur villa wants to improve their loading capabilities, they must first change their streaming algorithm and then increases bandwith. Excuse my french
van the man Posted October 4, 2015 Posted October 4, 2015 Sounds very technical!! My technical evaluation is that RLC cams are pretty good and Voyeur Villa's cams are shit!!! LOL!!
Recommended Posts