Sulzer Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 Just now, beaver67 said: yes she does Maybe they were teasing her, and she don't like it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isidore57 Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 il y a 1 minute, beaver67 a dit : regarde comme ils ont eu une discussion animée dans la cuisine Nicole s'est fait remonter les bretelles encore par Jessica dans la cuisine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest beaver67 Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 Just now, sulzer25059 said: Maybe they were teasing her, and she don't like it hard to say what the conversation was about ????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seb38240 Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 maybe b 2 will visit b1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBsq69 Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 Yum! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vlkvlk111 Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 13 minutes ago, BBsq69 said: Yes she did and I am never one to subscribe to the innocent theory nor do I have expectations but allowing cameras to be covered up is plain wrong. I just suggest she is warned or fined and told not to let it happen again. Yeah you've paid to watch this event but I'm going to ask you stand behind this pillar because of one of the participants - you wouldn't be so sanguine about it then. I think people do have a right to be annoyed. Of course for me, I'm not premium any more but I would have been far from amused. Well I was there, and not annoyed. To keep your analogy, yes the pillar was unfortunate, but they did not hide behind it, so who cares. It's easy to throw accusations on the internet behind the veil of anonymity, and especially when one has the chance to hurt the targeted person (you have to assume that the tenants read our are told what is written about them), but in the real world, there is thing called the burden of proof. I defy anyone to prove that she was an accomplice of the guy (and no, "those girls are all lying w..." is not a proof) (ps : bbsq I like you, l am not specifically targeting you, you had been told a distorted story that is all) 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StnCld316 Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 27 minutes ago, lucasfrench59 said: Blood on the mattress ( Nicole ) UM Soon for the arrival of a New Mattress. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winnlove Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 il y a 11 minutes, isidore57 a dit : Nicole s'est fait remonter les bretelles encore par Jessica dans la cuisine Pourquoi tu dis "encore"? Je n'avais pas vu cela avant. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBsq69 Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 2 minutes ago, vlkvlk111 said: Well I was there, and not annoyed. To keep your analogy, yes the pillar was unfortunate, but they did not hide behind it, so who cares. It's easy to throw accusations on the internet behind the veil of anonymity, and especially when one has the chance to hurt the targeted person (you have to assume that the tenants read our are told what is written about them), but in the real world, there is thing called the burden of proof. I defy anyone to prove that she was an accomplice of the guy (and no, "those girls are all lying w..." is not a proof) (ps : bbsq I like you, l am not specifically targeting you, you had been told a distorted story that is all) I don't believe I have been told a distorted story and nothing I have said should cause offence anyway but I am saying to you that to say Nicole is not responsible for any view being blocked is a nonsense and RLC should at the very least warn her about letting it happen again. What she did after sounds great but I was merely commenting on the shower where I've been told (and correct me if I'm a wrong) she gave a BJ which nobody saw and which is precisely what people are paying to see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happyone Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 (edited) Jess seems the more serious adult and Nicole the flamboyant child And Lima the enjoyable comedian and arbitrator Edited December 15, 2016 by happyone add last sentence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sulzer Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 12 minutes ago, beaver67 said: hard to say what the conversation was about ????? Wish i could understand them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sulzer Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 Yeah as i thought they are all fine now, laughing and chatting away in the kitchen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts