clivebb Posted February 5, 2017 Share Posted February 5, 2017 in my opinion this guest couple of last night is a porn actor couple paid by VH for come here sometime for fuck with anna/alex and like this try get a maximum of suscribers,just need to read the twitter account of vh for know what is the goal of vh it's just a bashing of tweets and pics for incited the peoples to suscribe i don't like that 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yury Posted February 5, 2017 Share Posted February 5, 2017 1 hour ago, thedbear said: I quoted a timetable on the timeline (23:55 pm) where I get the impression that Anna talks to Peter and Emma, talking about the meeting on the way to happen. Can again you throw a light on this diffuse tunnel if she invites both to stay and Emma gently declines, or does she somehow ask for the private space in the room? . Or if none of this happened? My feeling is that Emma and Peter did not even know this meeting in advance. Very bad sound. Apparently Anna explains to them what they will do (they had planned to play sexual games). Perhaps she invited them to join. It was possible to hear, as Peter said "No" and shook his head. In short: I think Peter and Emma were invited to take part in the party, but refused. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabbath1987 Posted February 5, 2017 Share Posted February 5, 2017 1 hour ago, Yury said: Very bad sound. Apparently Anna explains to them what they will do (they had planned to play sexual games). Perhaps she invited them to join. It was possible to hear, as Peter said "No" and shook his head. In short: I think Peter and Emma were invited to take part in the party, but refused. Yeah thats what VHTV wrote me on twitter. They are not wanna join. So Anna and Alex did not send them away and would not have a problem with another couple join the fun. Thats nice of them 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedbear Posted February 5, 2017 Share Posted February 5, 2017 Immeasurably grateful, Yury! This completely changes the direction of the boat still in the middle of the sea. It reinforces the image that Anna is a person pleasant and social, with anyone. This possibility of breaking his personality rule was bothering me and a lot there. Evident, however, that Emma and Pater were not part of the "party or games" scope in their initial planning. Here is a question (and no answer)! If it is was not motivated by the step in the right direction that both gave in the direction of reversing the pessimism of all of us here on it before. With force to which you exclaimed (even with bad sound), I again reviewed the line this time from the point of 23:40 3m onwards until their exit from the room .. Many monosyllabic conversations between the two (more extensive on the part of Emma) . So now we have a big question here. If the end of the invitation was Peter, then Emma's attitude in the bedroom was that she wanted to "pay" to see? If so, my greatest fear here is present. We have drawn the front again an MNAE apartment, .if there is any intervention of "up" to cut this evil still in its phase of trying to root roots. They were done together in moments, but clearly separated into "key situations. In counterpoint, glad that Peter took this attitude (even without basis), because in my view both are still not ready and firm for this first step with strangers there. Building this base for Alex and Anna will already be a very considerable challenge. I hope the "top" orientation also works on this point. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedbear Posted February 5, 2017 Share Posted February 5, 2017 Just for registration: already had elaborated the answer before reading the topic above. But as some things pointed out in it are still pertinent, I decided to go ahead and expose anyway. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy3 Posted February 5, 2017 Share Posted February 5, 2017 @Yury any idea why Alex turned into a baby who had to be consoled by Anna? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedbear Posted February 5, 2017 Share Posted February 5, 2017 Effectively, this is getting much more complicated than it should be. My strongest feeling here on the site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabbath1987 Posted February 5, 2017 Share Posted February 5, 2017 I fear we get the same situation here like it was with Mash, Nick and Alina, Eugene. Two couples living in one appartement but complete strangers to each other. At the end one will be left out... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabbath1987 Posted February 5, 2017 Share Posted February 5, 2017 And it wont work out with Emma being MIA such a long time. She much more time away than any other participant on VH or even VV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedbear Posted February 5, 2017 Share Posted February 5, 2017 18 minutes ago, jabbath1987 said: Yeah thats what VHTV wrote me on twitter. They are not wanna join. So Anna and Alex did not send them away and would not have a problem with another couple join the fun. Thats nice of them So Anna and Alex did not send them away and would not have a problem with another couple join the fun Jabbatt, please, this point the translation for me was confused. Can you try to improve the sense? Advance grateful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedbear Posted February 5, 2017 Share Posted February 5, 2017 7 minutes ago, jabbath1987 said: Receio que temos a mesma situação aqui como foi com Mash, Nick e Alina, Eugene. Dois casais que vivem em um apartamento, mas completa estranhos uns aos outros. No final será deixado de fora ... MNAE Then we have the same line of sight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabbath1987 Posted February 5, 2017 Share Posted February 5, 2017 5 minutes ago, thedbear said: So Anna and Alex did not send them away and would not have a problem with another couple join the fun Jabbatt, please, this point the translation for me was confused. Can you try to improve the sense? Advance grateful. Just wanted to say Anna and Alex would be ok with another couple joining. But Emma and Peter did not want to and separated themselves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts