sr71gn Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 This is every bit as exciting as watching the grass grow 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boitoske Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 I think that VH should put a "minimum click" into the tenants agreement. For example: They agree to get a minimum of 5000 clicks (views) from subscribers per month. If they do not achieve the minimum after 2 consecutive months then their tenancy should end and VH should install new tenants. A tenancy that is exiting or interesting to watch would certainly and easily get the required minimum. If subscribers think a tenancy like this one (M&G) is boring or not worth watching then the subscribers should not click on this apartment for the next month, preventing tenants from getting the required minimum. This would also be democratically correct as it would be the subscribers who decide who goes and who stays. We are paying for a service and therefore wish to receive value for money. If enough of you guys (and ladies) agree with the above suggestion, then please copy the above text and post it to the VH mods.... If they get bombarded with the suggestion, they might take notice. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maturin Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 10 minutes ago, Boitoske said: I think that VH should put a "minimum click" into the tenants agreement. For example: They agree to get a minimum of 5000 clicks (views) from subscribers per month. If they do not achieve the minimum after 2 consecutive months then their tenancy should end and VH should install new tenants. A tenancy that is exiting or interesting to watch would certainly and easily get the required minimum. If subscribers think a tenancy like this one (M&G) is boring or not worth watching then the subscribers should not click on this apartment for the next month, preventing tenants from getting the required minimum. This would also be democratically correct as it would be the subscribers who decide who goes and who stays. We are paying for a service and therefore wish to receive value for money. If enough of you guys (and ladies) agree with the above suggestion, then please copy the above text and post it to the VH mods.... If they get bombarded with the suggestion, they might take notice. It's a pretty good suggeston but I bet even Grisha and Maria are still getting a lot of clicks because people remember the potential they had so they still click because of the chance something might be going on. Maybe this is even how currently their performance/bonus is worked out because these potatoes are still here with no sign of being dropped. It would be better if the metric used was number of hours watched per month. Obviously if there is someting interesting going on then the total viewer hours would be much higher than the total number of hours viewed otherwise. Indeed the clicks total should be much lower because people click once and stay there. Good suggestion anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boitoske Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 Have to agree with you there Maturin... hours viewed would be a better suggestion because, as you say, if it is interesting, you stay longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ze81 Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 3 hours ago, Boitoske said: I think that VH should put a "minimum click" into the tenants agreement. For example: They agree to get a minimum of 5000 clicks (views) from subscribers per month. If they do not achieve the minimum after 2 consecutive months then their tenancy should end and VH should install new tenants. A tenancy that is exiting or interesting to watch would certainly and easily get the required minimum. If subscribers think a tenancy like this one (M&G) is boring or not worth watching then the subscribers should not click on this apartment for the next month, preventing tenants from getting the required minimum. This would also be democratically correct as it would be the subscribers who decide who goes and who stays. We are paying for a service and therefore wish to receive value for money. If enough of you guys (and ladies) agree with the above suggestion, then please copy the above text and post it to the VH mods.... If they get bombarded with the suggestion, they might take notice. 100% agree.This residents aren't doing the minimal effort at all.They just want to do their day to day life...THE PROBLEM IS..they are in VH..and in an VH house..super boring house.Just for exemple of one past day..grisha and maid were out most of the day..Maria and guest stay in living room coach watching tv and eating most of the day..nothing more nothing less..and VH pay them for this!?with the money we pay them!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ze81 Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 3 hours ago, Maturin said: It's a pretty good suggeston but I bet even Grisha and Maria are still getting a lot of clicks because people remember the potential they had so they still click because of the chance something might be going on. Maybe this is even how currently their performance/bonus is worked out because these potatoes are still here with no sign of being dropped. It would be better if the metric used was number of hours watched per month. Obviously if there is someting interesting going on then the total viewer hours would be much higher than the total number of hours viewed otherwise. Indeed the clicks total should be much lower because people click once and stay there. Good suggestion anyway. One thing for sure,if you go see the archive there is little of this house,specialy recently and even more something cool or special..what it's for worrie more it's that VH doesn't do nothing and in others cases they act fast...could be this residents some previlegies that they don't need to do shit and they will stay forever...hope not because i still believe in VH and their rules of residents be active. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kkru394 Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 There's a guest couple there now. Guy and a girl with backpacks. Checking the house out . They still need cams wherever ivy and the maid stayed last night Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kkru394 Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 And the second the guest couple leave the yard, they disappear. I hate this house layout Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ze81 Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 24 minutes ago, Kkru394 said: And the second the guest couple leave the yard, they disappear. I hate this house layout Seem to be more rooms than we think,also more outs of house that we don't see.So many wrong things with this place.For exemple the maid only took ONE shower sinse arrive!?She it's living in the house and goes shower in another's place.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ze81 Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 Iuksss..had some hopes the maid was gone for good finaly but nope..she arrived..nice now we can continue watching her doing nothing and only bloking things..greatttt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherri Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 Ivy is in the house, now she needs to call Rambo and have some action 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy3 Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 Click and bounce! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.gif.e335e3b234713d678b8911e6eec69d7b.gif)
Recommended Posts