Howard

I don't think there was a rift. Like a carton of milk, everything has an expiration date. Here's my take: I think for most of 2016 and 1st quarter of 2017, she (more then he) felt things were going stale (or the spark of love extinguished). I think they were just going through the motions (subconsciously feeling no need to continuously impress one another). She stopped trying (as in making a fancy dinner, dressing for a night of romance, etc.) and he was just....Stepan. He has/had always been stoic for the 4+ years that I've observed. I don't think he every bought her flowers or anything remote to what a b/f or husband does for his wife or g/f (to show appreciation). I think she came to that realization early on but went with the flow as it was 'comfortable'. Sometime early 2017 (I'm guessing March), she decided to look for love (w/o telling Stepan). She needed affection (as we all do) and someone willing to "open a door" for her. THAT...is why I think she cheated on Stepan with BT (as they were still a couple). BT and Maya hooked up (don't know if by chance or cupid struck). She and Stepan broke it off, had a convo, concluded they had a good thing going (free rent, utilities, etc). Many of us noticed she and Stepan were not boinking since Spring 2017 and when BT made his first appearance (August or September, 2017), well,...the rest is history. Will BT move in??? Don't know. But as he's not at the apartment 24/7 and it seems he can be absent for 3-4 days at a time (too early to tell), either he's going to school, has a job or in the military. Any of those 3 choices makes him a better man than Stepan.

While on the subject of one less cam, VHTV needs to re-think that banner that goes across the screen showing other apartments. Occupying 20% screen space - especially on cams that are poorly placed where people are active (but blocked by the banner), is ill-conceived. RLC's solution is much better.

I know I'm quoting myself, but I should expand my thoughts on taking away that LR cam. I assume M & H are one of the top three visited sites (based on the short time they've been on VHTV and also on this CC forum activity). With that said, first time VHTV visitors will rarely see them as they are if only the Loggia cam is activated. They are not romantic (or active) when smoking a cig or on the computer. Doesn't seem like a smart business move to (practically) eliminate cam-access on one of your most frequently visited channels. This channel BRINGS membership. Newbies will tune in, see an empty cam (because in a 24 hr period, they less likely to be the loggia then any other room besides the bathroom), and move on (to RLC?).

IMO, better to take away that LR camera. Makes me less eager to subscribe when things get hot in the LR and then the action moves to the BR. By not seeing any action at all, I can go on and do more constructive things (spending too much time on-line).

She's not complex. If anything, I'd say she's vain, a bit immature living a Hollywood dream/fantasy (meaning she has all these risque clothes that if not for the cameras...she'd still buy them but with what money or purpose (other then feeling 'special'). If she was here in Los Angeles (or New York), she wouldn't survive long. Her expectations of an American life are superficial and she would be overwhelmed (if she was to live here). As a tourist, she'd soak it all up and have a blast. She (and Paul) are in a holding pattern. Both in their mid 20s with no future planned. He's working but it doesn't seem to be a rewarding job. Most likely labor intensive. She's home most of the day acting out a houswife lifestyle; 'working' as she entertains for the cameras. Neither have thought very much about their future - including starting a family.

It's nice to see Maya affectionate outside the bedroom. Looks like she's in love (until she cheats on BT as I think she cheated on Stepan).

Sheriff Aparo (sp?) in Arizona did that and the courts found his policies violated the civil rights of convicts. I found that ruling laughable; as if some of these convicts (i.e. murderers) deserve to have THEIR civil rights protected. Have them make license plates, pick up trash off the highways - do something that benefits society. Maybe build future prisons/detention centers. Chain gangs were mostly paid labor for private enterprise that only the jails benefited from (and the private enterprise).

Wish you would have 'paragraphed' your post for easier reading (and better to respond by). I'm getting confused on your position. If it's about protecting kids, tougher firearm access laws wont do it. There's a bigger problem (besides the mental health issue): The continuing moral and ethical decay of society. Absentee moms/dads, lack of traditional values, latchkey kids, violent video/computer games, ganster-type of music videos, and so on. Politicians (and society) needs to address the root of the problem. Armed guards/teachers in school is (IMO) an acceptable TEMPORARY SOLUTION. But that won't stop a knucklehead from renting a van and plowing through the gates/fence of a playground while kids are at recess. And we shouldn't have to live in a law abiding society surrounded by walls and crash resistant pylons (often found in front of various federal buildings). I'm OK with temporary solutions but only if the root cause of the action is addressed. Otherwise, we're putting lipstick on a pig.

Those people are called Democrats (liberals). I'm in favor of the death penalty. Not in favor of hard labor (maybe you need to expand on 'hard labor' so I know what you mean).

Los Angeles (southern California) is known as the "high-speed police pursuit" capital of the country. On average, there are seven police pursuits daily (3 in the city of L.A.). On average, there are three police pursuits weekly that exceed 15 minutes (do a search on YouTube for LAPD police pursuits to see how dangerous they can be). To curtail these dangerous pursuits, about five years ago it became an automatic 6 month jail time for first offenders. So why do we have more pursuits now then ever before??? Because while first time (or second or third time) offenders get their jail sentence, they only serve about 10-20% of the time BECAUSE THE STATE REFUSES to build more prisons! Bad guys get early release due to prison over-crowding. What kind of punishment is it to be told you'll serve prison time for running from the cops when you know you'll be out before the ink on the paperwork gets dry! I'm in favor of the death penalty but not sure about bad guys getting a whipping. Would rather see them incarcerated and making license plates. Again, it all comes down to not addressing the ROOT of the problem.

If what you say is true, there would be no crimes involving a firearm in the state of California or the cities of Chicago or New York. Gun laws in these jurisdictions only affect law abiding people. Bad guys will get guns. Bad guys will get ammo for the guns. Whether through open borders (i.e. Mexico), gangs or other means. These strict gun laws in California have been around for over 25 years and crimes involving firearms (including murders) continue to rise. Yes, they keep going up, UP and UP! A few years ago the L.A.P.D. (and the state of California) tried masking the increase in firearm crimes buy categorizing some crimes as misdemeanors (and not felonies). LAPD bent a little bit under public pressure but the state of California (starting with the governor) continuously DECREASES the punishments for using a firearm in a crime. Several actions that were classified as felonies have turned into misdemeanors. Felons are getting early release from prison - Why??? Because of prison over-crowding. Instead of building more prisons (it's been 25+ years since the last state prison was built yet the state's population has increased 7.6 million during that time). Politicians have to address the ROOT of the problem(s). Not manipulate a solution that adversely affects society (or until a politician's term expires). Written laws regarding firearms only affect good guys. You want to solve a problem?? Go to the root of the problem. Can't afford to pay rent next month?? Don't commit a crime - get a job (or further your education for a better paying job). Yea, sounds basic and simple but you get my jest. I go back to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. If it was addressed 60+ years ago why the Palestinians feel they have a claim to Israeli land, there would be no issue. These Palestinians, who were kicked out of Libya, Syria, etc because they were poor and uneducated (and a burden on their country's economy), would be back in their homeland contributing towards their country's economy. The world (UN) turned the other way and basically said 'its not my problem. Same basic reason why the Holocaust occurred. It's the ROOT of the problem that must be addressed. Everything else is either a band-aid, set to appease ignorant voters, or a stop-gap until a politician's term expires.

The issue shouldn't be whether armed guards should be on campus. I'm OK with it if it is a TEMPORARY SOLUTION. Society has to get to the root of the problem and that's mental illness. The NRA is doing what needs to be done to ensure the 2nd amendment stays intact (and also defends its own membership). As an NRA member, I don't agree with some of their positions but the facts are, give in a little and before you know it, your rights are taken away (which is what's going on in California regarding gun rights for the past 20 years). Don't hate on firearms. Hate on politicians who continue to ignore mental health 'problems' (that many politicians created by de-funding hospitals and sanitariums back in the 1980s). You can't fix a leaking water pipe without addressing the root problem of replacing the pipe. And you can't fix the indirect problems of society without first addressing and fixing the root problem (mental health). Politicians know what to do. But it has become political suicide to enact legislation to address mental illness. It's easier for politicians to let the public address a solution that will NOT bear any political expense.

Its is a political problem. More specifically, their lack of identifying & doing something about mental health issues in society. Unfortunately, it's turned into an Israeli-Palestinian issue. And what I mean by that is if you look back to history, it's the Palestinians that got kicked out of the Arab countries by their own brothers!. They never had a historical claim to Israeli land. But as generations pass and facts become obscure,... The same with mental health issues and the lack of politicians acting to get it under control. Its now, after decades of political neglect, have turned into a gun control issue. Lets keep sweeping society issues under the rug.

100% agree. Its what makes the Democratic economic engine run. They target lemmings who don't want to think for themselves. And IMO, the Hollywood elite are liberals because its what makes the Hollywood economic engine run. I read in Variety about four years ago that 78% of movie-goers during the first two weeks of a theatrical release are people who live paycheck-to-paycheck (which are mostly liberals). And 67% of DVDs sold during the first two weeks of a movie release are the same people. Hollywood needs to cater to the demographic that feeds their economic engine - and that happens to be liberals. I have a difficult time believing that Steven Spielbreg, Geffen, Weinstien (forget about his problems for a moment), etc are liberals because they personally believe in the liberal mantra. It is all about business. While they get their funding through predominately Republican-based capitalists, they know it is the bleeding heart liberals that buy movie tickets, merchandise, DVDs, etc that pads their bank accounts.

Looks like that ass found a nice 'cushion' to sit on last night. Twice. (Image Content No Longer Available)

If there was ever a time the dog needed a cold brew (see table), now would be it. (Image Content No Longer Available)

If BT was to live with Maya, the channel would be call Maya & Boy Toy. Don't think he's moving in. Yet. But on a related issue, she can't carry the channel on her own. She doesn't have the character or personality (as I see it for what is needed). She's much the opposite of Leora. Leora cold carry the channel on her own (dresses sexy, alluring, wears shear nighttime attire, she's a bate machine, is into girly things, etc). The only think missing in Leora's character (if she was on her own) is she doesn't seem the type to bring random guys to the apartment (she's known Paul since she was 16 and have been living together since she was 18 or 19. Can't imagine her being promiscuous). Maya - she prefers a tool belt to a garter belt. Wears little make up and prefers cotton jammies and granny panties to an overnight shirt and a flimsy teddy. For whatever reason, I can see her bringing guys home for a fuck (not often but whenever she needs a 'release'). Maya is more a man eater (but as we've seen, likes to be eaten by a man). Maya's channel can't survive as it is now. Either BT will eventually move in, stay a couple nights at a time or Maya's gonna have to let out her feminine side for all to see.

I'm also having problems viewing gifs and uploading jpegs. *I* think its a new problem on the host's end (maybe the sysop cam ook into it). Maybe a software upgrade that didn't take?.

Here ya go... A side of Maya's personality we haven't entirely seen before. (Video & Image Content No Longer Available)

As a community, we may have to establish a GoFundMe page and buy Maya membership to a local health club. She's been gaining a few pounds and we don't want Boy Toy to be turned off by the added poundage. :-).

Based on what I've seen in the past, she doesn't have problems having an orgasm. Her yelps and moans are louder/stronger than her body climaxing. Physically, she's not a strong finisher (more like Maya but definitely not like Leora) but she does get satisfied.

I think he did OK considering I've seen him perform worse in the past. What he should have done is more oral on her. Also, she likes the back door and I don't think he has the stamina for that. In which case he should have gotten the dildo and...

Today's post is titled: It's Better Than Nothing. RLC quit on me twice during this video (neither at the best times). Nevertheless, better to post than not post at all. Video is in two parts (at one link) that can be seen independently. (Video & Image Content No Longer Available) NOTE TO SYSOP: Having difficulties posting larger thumbnails (the past several days). Please advise via PM.

Nelly is a better housekeeper. But when it comes to vacuuming, nobody sucks better than Anabel.

Can't take credit for this video and only have time to catch/post one screen grab. Trust me...you'll want to download this movie. Anabel at her finest with Efim in terrible 'anguish' (just look at the guy's face!). This girl gets little attention yet IMO she has the most "talent" of anyone on RLC. She needs to put that violin and cello down and call Vivid.