letsdothis

?? What power magnifying glass and flashlight are you using?

X3

X2

Ba-Dum-Bum

Thank you profusely for that little tip. Already had the free account. Didn't know it would get rid of the preview bar over the main screen. I could kiss you, if you aren't a guy.

Truer words!! The way that poor cat gets thrown about is sinful. She's not a toy!!

Sparkles, I only said that because I was pretty sure I'd read a post of yours where you said that was the reason you stopped. I read it somewhere. It must have been someone else who said it.

Strange shape.

That is one hell of a bruise. When you get to the full-size of this pic, you can see it's a circle with a line through it. Rather a strange shape for a bruise. Did you say she got it having sex?

He made that decision because people criticized the way he posted pics.

Glad I could help. Good to have you back. You seem to be in a better state of mind. I'm happy for you.

That middle finger sure is a universal gesture. It's at least 2500 years old. Aristophanes wrote about this gesture in his play "The Clouds", which first played in 423 BC, where none other than Socrates was presented the middle finger by Strepsiades. And even then it was considered a rude and indecent gesture, mimicking the penis and testicles. The gesture communicates moderate to extreme contempt and is roughly equivalent in meaning to "fuck off," "fuck you," "shove it up your ass," "up yours," or "go fuck yourself." The word "fuck" is of Germanic origin (way to go, Jabba! ), related to Dutch, German, and Swedish words for “to strike” and “to move back and forth.” Probably more than you wanted to know, but now you know.

THAT is just adorable! Love it!! 0 19.37 kB

THAT is just adorable! Love it!!

I think I came pretty close. I enlarged the pic 300%. This is a section of that enlargement. I think you're right. It looks like her foot is on the bed beside his leg. However, it looks to me like her shin is laying up against his knee, if not slightly overlapping it. But, I'm sure you know how the camera can play tricks on the eye. Although, I think @Howard is right. We're just grasping at straws in the wind. And @Howard, ( can I call you Popeye? Every time I see your avatar, I just want to call you Popeye. Would that be OK?) I think you're right on pretty much everything you said. And what you said in your last paragraph, is just about a spot on definition for "cuckold". (Image Content No Longer Available)

Jabba, you the man!! Thanks!

And a good thought. Thanks.

Am I seeing things or is her leg draped over his? And are they watching a movie together? Is this an old pic?

Now that you say it, I can see that little baby-fat face of Belle on the girl by the tree. But, the girl on the left, who is obviously the same girl, doesn't look anything like Belle at all, in the face, IMHO. And she looks a LOT older than the other girls. Much older. Even when Belle started out back in B1, I could never understand peoples' fascination with her. Again, this is all JMO.

OK, I'll bite. Which one is BB? And who is the girl in the GIF? Edit: Or did you mean BBsq69?

Her air panties. Nice!

Smithy, I think you misspelled that. Shouldn't it be "dick"? BTW, I love your avatar.

With the addition of the preview bar across the main screen for non-members, with no way to remove it, that makes VH pretty much useless to me. And you were doing such a great job.

This looks like a tactic RLC would use and as far as I'm concerned, RLC is the asshole of the world. This is stooping pretty low, VH. " RLC is the asshole of the world." Refers to the management who make the shitty, greedy decisions, not the regular staff or the website.

Bear, I'm really trying, but I guess we're gonna have to agree to not understand. You seem to be saying the same thing, but it doesn't seem to have anything to do with what I'm saying. For example: "Not that we stop "discussing" but that was precisely our "discussion" about what I believe (my vision)" If I understand this correctly, what I was talking about in my first reply to you, was completely unrelated to your "vision" of, "this is just Stella, Stephen, and Chris." We weren't talking about your vision. I was referring only to your point where you said we should not discuss any further, whether or not they were siblings because it had already been discussed. That's what I was talking about to moos, so that had to be what you were talking about in the first line of your first post, which was: "Gentlemen, please! This has already been observed." That line has nothing to do with your vision. I tried to be as clear as possible. I hope I was.