I've always respected and liked almost all your posts in threads relating to the person usually referred to in these threads of the forum. Although there may have been some, and to my recollection very few items of subject matter in any of your posts relating to that particular person, that I ever had any disagreement with, I do respectfully have somewhat of a difference of opinion as to whether it should be considered acceptable that someone should choose to begin to more seriously criticize someone else more than previously ever had merely because of not feeling as much of being as satisfied as evidently may have been previously, mainly because of a change in venue that precipitated a change of available exposure of the person being criticized. Although there may have been some playful criticism from a particular person at times previous to a change in venue and thus times of availability of a person being criticized, it is imo that a change in venue and time of availability should not constitute a reason to more seriously criticize the person who was involved in the changes. Although it is certain that the times of availability for one particular person had changed with the change in venue and location, as it is certain as well that there is difference from someone actually viewing something live and in real time as compared to something recorded, and it also certain that everyone is entitled to their own views and opinions of various subject matter, but is also imo that it is actually quite ridiculous for anyone's views and opinions to change to a point of turning from criticisms of more of a playful nature, to that of more serious criticisms merely because of something as trivial as is a difference of exposure time availability as has occurred with the one particular person of the project, and recent changes in venue related to the project with that person. Any possible viewers in the northwestern hemisphere were in a similar predicament before the changes in venue and times occurred. As far as expectations are concerned, I agree to an extent that when anyone pays for something, they have reasonable expectations to have received something worth what they have paid for. It is likely that some had gotten used to certain activities or occasions of occurrences of more interest to them occurring to have grown to expect more of those occasions of more interest to occur, and especially if they were paying customers, but everyone knows what the project was started out to be, and is supposed to be before they ever pay to have a subscription. So it is imo, that expectations should perhaps be kept at a minimum.