Jump to content
*** New Software Coming Soon! Please Check for Important Information in the Read Me Section ***

Amy3

Members
  • Posts

    44,425
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    30
  • Points

    -61,430 [ Donate ]

Everything posted by Amy3

  1. Perhaps they fell in love, but they just don’t have that much else in common. Playing Cupid here! How do we get them talking like lovers do? They need some good old fashioned romance in their lives. The third wheel isn’t helping that’s for sure. Maybe they should Uber her to South Beach for the day and then they can work on adding some spice to their life! This could be their niche since it’s pretty clear the imagined Miami lifestyle isn’t going to come to fruition. It’s worth a shot dontcha think? Come on AG, stop treating each other like stale bread and fall in love again. Show us how it’s done! 💘
  2. I’ve written extensively about this. Basically take your membership rate divide it by 2 since VH takes their 50% off the top and then divide that number by the number of seconds in that period of time. That’s how much your total value is per second. Then when you watch a pay cam, that’s how much the tenant earns each second that you watch. Whatever seconds that you don’t want through the day goes straight back to VHTV. So, when I was a sub my daily value was $0.33. So if I didn’t watch anything that day VHTV keep all of it on top of the other $0.33 that took off the top. Tenants only have a chance to earn your money through time viewed. I’m pretty sure that’s down to the second. There is an arguement that says VHTV only takes 50% and then evenly spreads the other 50% per your viewing rate, but I don’t believe it. Under this, the amount of time you view each day increasing in value the less you watch. So, for example if you’re worth $0.50 and you watch a pay cam for 24hrs, each hour your view would be worth $0.02. But if you only watched for 1 hour your worth for that hour would be the whole $0.50. Like I said I don’t believe this. I think VHTV takes whatever you don’t use. As for the amount they earn. That depends of course. I would say anywhere from $100/month to as much as $3000/month tops. Depends on the number of subscribers and the time watched. Numbers that only VHTV knows.
  3. IMHO! VHTV is hosting 2 very sick people, who appear to have some sort of serious sexual dysfunction. What's happening here is not healthy and to me quite disturbing. These people need help! VHTV needs to look into this situation further. They’re like candy addicts who found their way into the chocolate factory and VHTV is selling ticket to watch their demise. Something isn’t right here!
  4. I sometimes wonder if there is a certain number of erections a man can have in his lifetime before it gives out. Kinda like a lithium ion battery can only be charged about 500 times before it can’t hold the same charge. If so, I’d say Romeo is fucked! Lol!!! 😮
  5. It’s VHTV, what do you expect! But to be fair, they don’t have to do anything. It’s always possible that a manager could be a hard ass and demand a level of performance, but VHTV doesn’t do that. In the end a tenant can always say no and leave. We have to assume that they are doing this of their own free will. I would advise anyone considering this life to do whatever it takes to be your own manager then your only obligation is to your own bills. VHTV will not kick a tenant out just because of low earnings. No one has to do anything they don’t want to. For that you have to trust VHTV has oversight over the managers.
  6. I agree! They scammed VH if you ask me. I may be a voyeur and I don’t expect to see cam shows, but these people are just normal people who really don’t have much going on. That’s fine! Most of us are like that too, but what’s to see here or be interested in? They don’t even seem to get along all that well if you ask me. They only seem to talk to each other when they need to. Would you expose yourself to a life under cams for a few hundred dollars a month? I wouldn’t. I don’t know what they were expecting. 👎🏻
  7. Thx! I would still love to know what happens to the original guy she was with. Wouldn’t you just love to hear his perspective on what he thinks about Misty’s life on VH. I have to wonder these things.
  8. Good for her to stick to her plans and not cave just for the money or the pressure to be something she clearly is not interested in being anymore. One’s essence is all they really have to call their own in this world. You could say that she came here to kick ass and chew bubblegum! Well Misty enjoy your bubblegum girl! Your legacy here will reign supreme for some time to come! 🍬 All the best Misty! Happy life to you!! ❤️💋
  9. Had to do that didn’t you!! Fuck if Batman isn’t everywhere!
  10. Yes! I agree. Don’t tolerate that! You took your time to try and help them out they should respond in kind with a personal response.
  11. Thank you! That was very nice. I’m no angel and I’ve done plenty to dis-earn this respect. Underneath the vaneer of my transgressions is the real me though. I want to be kind and faithful. My wounds burn deep though. I’m sorry.
  12. Bye Dean and Candy! Thanks for keeping the names I gave you. Thanks for the good times. All the best! ♥️💋
  13. It is fair Jabbath because VHTV won't tell us what the rules are when it comes to the tenants and the cams. Until they do, it's pointless! All we can do is complain and hope. But, in this case what people want is a definition of what constitutes a No No when it comes to a guest covering the cams. But wait, they took the apt offline, so that in and of itself must mean that a guest covering the cams is a No No. I'm sorry, what is it that people are complaining about again? I guess it's nothing really. VH already took care of it per their rules. I guess people here are really complaining over nothing really. As for "the many improvements"! Maybe in the beginning, but I've had many, many very good suggestions and virtually all of them fell flat and VHTV has done nothing. Do remember how hard it was to get VHTV to fix the issue with the previews. It's like it takes a freaking monumental effort that most of the time isn't worth the time and effort. I figure why bother anymore! Even you can't get James to deal with stuff hardly anymore. There are many many posts on here where someone brings up some issue and you say that you'll talk to James about it only for nothing to happen whatsoever. Sorry, I'm not knocking you, but this idea that VH listens to it's members is a stretch.
  14. Maybe they were going to do that anyways. ☺️
  15. Bottom line is that none of your complaints matter. VHTV will do what they want. Your only recourse is to annoy them with tickets and hope for the result you want, but you'll never get it. The event has already passed, so all you can hope for is a definition of a rule from VHTV about cam covering. If VHTV cared about these sorts of things they would specify the rules of behavior with regards to the cams. But, they won't cause this is ratings gold for them and if they set a rule then they have to live by it. They have learned that it is a much better position to remain neutral towards us on these matters and simply watch us get eaten up over it. Truly the best response to cam coverer's is to ignore them. But, voyeurs being voyeurs they can't do it. They will focus on what they think they missed and it will irritate them to no end. VHTV is laughing at us while they count the managers fine money they earned today.
  16. Except VHTV. It's a win for them. Not only do they get all of this attention, which solidifies their subscriber base, they also get to collect a large fine from the manager. This doesn't hurt them in any way shape or form. It's a full WIN!
  17. This is not what VHTV has said is the rule. Would be nice if they would state what the No No's are as they evolve so that people can then know whether or not something is worthy of complaining about. They won't do it though, because as you can see this is a huge boon to their business. People complaining means people are interested, thus, people are more likely to stay a subscriber. The mental acrobat act works like this. If I am willing to devote my time and energy into complaining, then I must value that which I'm complaining about and the hook is set! Trust me, VHTV and the manager is giggling with joy over all of this. I'm just surprised that they don't fuck with us even more then they already do.
  18. I guess it all depends on what VHTV classifies as a NO NO. In the end what right does a sub have to view the cams and what rights do the tentants and VHTV have to deny them access after taking their money.
  19. Perhaps Humpty Dumpty didn’t just fall off the wall. Perhaps he was pushed. I want to know if this is true and why. Everyone else seems to dismiss that possibility and just focus on the broken pieces with a look worry and wonder on how this poor egg can’t be fixed.
  20. Ah, yes, I see! That’s why I added the comment about the idea of going offline for maintenance. A tenants can “hide” by requesting to terminate the service for any reason. You don’t pay to see an unhindered view. In fact the subs ability to view the cams is frequently hindered and you are not given an explanation as the truth of the reason, simply maintenance is all you get.
  21. I mean both. I already hashed this out with VHTV and per James there are no rules against the tenants hiding from the cams. They can do what they want. I think logic carries that over to even covering the cams. If not, why not?
  22. I feel the same way. Serious lack of imagination on the part of VHTV! 😣
  23. ....and the result of the complaining was? What did VHTV say?
  24. ....and just so everyone knows a tenant can request to have all of their content deleted from the archives. Likely citing a threat to their personal safety via some form of blackmail is sufficient cause for deletion. Word to the wise! If you want it you better get it while you can.
×
×
  • Create New...