Amy3

Should link the poll here.

It’s VHTV, what do you expect! But to be fair, they don’t have to do anything. It’s always possible that a manager could be a hard ass and demand a level of performance, but VHTV doesn’t do that. In the end a tenant can always say no and leave. We have to assume that they are doing this of their own free will. I would advise anyone considering this life to do whatever it takes to be your own manager then your only obligation is to your own bills. VHTV will not kick a tenant out just because of low earnings. No one has to do anything they don’t want to. For that you have to trust VHTV has oversight over the managers.

I agree! They scammed VH if you ask me. I may be a voyeur and I don’t expect to see cam shows, but these people are just normal people who really don’t have much going on. That’s fine! Most of us are like that too, but what’s to see here or be interested in? They don’t even seem to get along all that well if you ask me. They only seem to talk to each other when they need to. Would you expose yourself to a life under cams for a few hundred dollars a month? I wouldn’t. I don’t know what they were expecting. 👎🏻

Thx! I would still love to know what happens to the original guy she was with. Wouldn’t you just love to hear his perspective on what he thinks about Misty’s life on VH. I have to wonder these things.

Good for her to stick to her plans and not cave just for the money or the pressure to be something she clearly is not interested in being anymore. One’s essence is all they really have to call their own in this world. You could say that she came here to kick ass and chew bubblegum! Well Misty enjoy your bubblegum girl! Your legacy here will reign supreme for some time to come! 🍬 All the best Misty! Happy life to you!! ❤️💋

Had to do that didn’t you!! Fuck if Batman isn’t everywhere!

Yes! I agree. Don’t tolerate that! You took your time to try and help them out they should respond in kind with a personal response.

Thank you! That was very nice. I’m no angel and I’ve done plenty to dis-earn this respect. Underneath the vaneer of my transgressions is the real me though. I want to be kind and faithful. My wounds burn deep though. I’m sorry.

Bye Dean and Candy! Thanks for keeping the names I gave you. Thanks for the good times. All the best! ♥️💋

It is fair Jabbath because VHTV won't tell us what the rules are when it comes to the tenants and the cams. Until they do, it's pointless! All we can do is complain and hope. But, in this case what people want is a definition of what constitutes a No No when it comes to a guest covering the cams. But wait, they took the apt offline, so that in and of itself must mean that a guest covering the cams is a No No. I'm sorry, what is it that people are complaining about again? I guess it's nothing really. VH already took care of it per their rules. I guess people here are really complaining over nothing really. As for "the many improvements"! Maybe in the beginning, but I've had many, many very good suggestions and virtually all of them fell flat and VHTV has done nothing. Do remember how hard it was to get VHTV to fix the issue with the previews. It's like it takes a freaking monumental effort that most of the time isn't worth the time and effort. I figure why bother anymore! Even you can't get James to deal with stuff hardly anymore. There are many many posts on here where someone brings up some issue and you say that you'll talk to James about it only for nothing to happen whatsoever. Sorry, I'm not knocking you, but this idea that VH listens to it's members is a stretch.

Maybe they were going to do that anyways. ☺️

Bottom line is that none of your complaints matter. VHTV will do what they want. Your only recourse is to annoy them with tickets and hope for the result you want, but you'll never get it. The event has already passed, so all you can hope for is a definition of a rule from VHTV about cam covering. If VHTV cared about these sorts of things they would specify the rules of behavior with regards to the cams. But, they won't cause this is ratings gold for them and if they set a rule then they have to live by it. They have learned that it is a much better position to remain neutral towards us on these matters and simply watch us get eaten up over it. Truly the best response to cam coverer's is to ignore them. But, voyeurs being voyeurs they can't do it. They will focus on what they think they missed and it will irritate them to no end. VHTV is laughing at us while they count the managers fine money they earned today.

Except VHTV. It's a win for them. Not only do they get all of this attention, which solidifies their subscriber base, they also get to collect a large fine from the manager. This doesn't hurt them in any way shape or form. It's a full WIN!

This is not what VHTV has said is the rule. Would be nice if they would state what the No No's are as they evolve so that people can then know whether or not something is worthy of complaining about. They won't do it though, because as you can see this is a huge boon to their business. People complaining means people are interested, thus, people are more likely to stay a subscriber. The mental acrobat act works like this. If I am willing to devote my time and energy into complaining, then I must value that which I'm complaining about and the hook is set! Trust me, VHTV and the manager is giggling with joy over all of this. I'm just surprised that they don't fuck with us even more then they already do.

I guess it all depends on what VHTV classifies as a NO NO. In the end what right does a sub have to view the cams and what rights do the tentants and VHTV have to deny them access after taking their money.

Perhaps Humpty Dumpty didn’t just fall off the wall. Perhaps he was pushed. I want to know if this is true and why. Everyone else seems to dismiss that possibility and just focus on the broken pieces with a look worry and wonder on how this poor egg can’t be fixed.

Ah, yes, I see! That’s why I added the comment about the idea of going offline for maintenance. A tenants can “hide” by requesting to terminate the service for any reason. You don’t pay to see an unhindered view. In fact the subs ability to view the cams is frequently hindered and you are not given an explanation as the truth of the reason, simply maintenance is all you get.

I mean both. I already hashed this out with VHTV and per James there are no rules against the tenants hiding from the cams. They can do what they want. I think logic carries that over to even covering the cams. If not, why not?

I feel the same way. Serious lack of imagination on the part of VHTV! 😣

....and the result of the complaining was? What did VHTV say?

....and just so everyone knows a tenant can request to have all of their content deleted from the archives. Likely citing a threat to their personal safety via some form of blackmail is sufficient cause for deletion. Word to the wise! If you want it you better get it while you can.

Just follow Twitter and here and you'll be able to follow and pretty much see everything that happens.

A tenant can request down time for "maintenance", which can be any reason really. So, in a sense they can alter a subscribers ability to view all of the cams in an apt simply by request. A subscriber does not have the right to 100% usability of the cams at all times. Per VHTV's logic, covering the cams is permitted.

Since VHTV already said that tenants can hide from the cams, what difference does it make if they hide from them by covering them. Isn't the punishment of a lack of views punishment enough? Just following VTHV's logic.

How's Romeo doing guys? I worry about him. Maybe some friends over for a movie or something would be good for a change.