Nina & Alan and Serena - Part #2

[thedbear]

8 minutes ago, Amy3 said:

Am I in trouble bear? 😬

It’s not enough for the tenant to get off themselves, they really do have to elicit fun, excitement, and passion from others who are around.

Do you think you are in trouble ???

[bravewildtiger2]

any news about Vanessa ?

[Amy3]

I agree with Misc. I’ve said this for a very long time. Vh’s model of views for pay creates sex for views and the authenticity of the sex becomes questionable. VH is running a very serious risk of operating a porn house. I don’t know what they can do at this point to stop it. 

[Amy3]

I don’t think a true voyeur style apt can compete with the amped up voyeur apt. I do think that VH has learned a lesson about the teneants being visible here. I haven’t seen it nearly as much as of late. I wonder if VH is in the process of putting an end to it. RLC and Camarads strictly forbid the tenants from being visible in the forums. 

[thedbear]

13 minutes ago, miscvoyeur said:

This is something I tried talking about when Chloe and James was around. 

This is the problem I see with this model of being paid based on the number of views. When you have apartments like this one with rampant threesome, orgies, partner swapping, and other crazy sex nights, a regular couple that just wants to do regular sex will get trampled. Then it becomes an issue of them either having to compete by doing things they don't really want to do but will do for extra views, or they will be like KPLP who will stick to doing whatever it is they do and potentially be forgotten about. Then in the managers instance, it becomes key to start finding couples who can out-crazy the already established crazy apartments.

Nina and Alan are a perfect example of this. Nina and Alan used to fuck like animals when they first started. People liked them in the beginning but then the interest started to wear off. Then Serena came in. Then Edda and Joe came in. Then the manager became involved. And all the while there was this "push" for them to start pushing their sexual limitations. Thankfully Nina was all down for it but you can visibly see Alan had issues with certain things and it cause a lot of animosity. And this was all because if I remember correctly, there were so little views that the manager was considering shutting down the apartment. 

Don't get me wrong, I love the crazy sex parties, the orgies, the threesomes and everything else, but these people are not hired porn actor and actresses hired to put on porn shows and I feel it to be a scarily unhealthy practice to start pushing on sex shows for money and fear of losing your house rather than doing them because you genuinely like doing them. Mira and Henry you can tell would doing orgies and swapping with or without cameras. Misty would be fucking different guys with or without cameras. Maybe I'm just overthinking it, but it is something I think about. Maybe half of it is along the lines of "if you can't handle the pressure than you shouldn't be on VH." But again, that comes around to the pay method. 

Sorry for the long post. I didn't intend it to be this long.

You just extended into something that I myself observed here in VH and at that time I used Ana and Alex (in their first apartment as an example and comparison). Almost a year later (will do in Feb), I was not wrong.

And for registration and reference. I have always been faithful, since their first "legs moved in the air" to this couple here. Not just for sex but for the real passion one has for the other.
 

[Sparkles]

Building now the excel with the same stats, since they was ordered by number of posts i notice there was two mistakes 

Lisa is at top3 - Need to be swapped with Rock&Anastasia, Nyusha
And Mika and Layne need to swap with Alice&Pavel

 

[miscvoyeur]

18 minutes ago, bravewildtiger2 said:

any news about Vanessa ?

Vanessa?

[bravewildtiger2]

2 minutes ago, miscvoyeur said:

Vanessa?

vanessa and markita RLC ?

[thedbear]

And I would really like it and very much that someone would uphold the "voyeur concept" for these two sites.

RLC is worse than VH, but everything is done on balconies, until now, magical, in blind spots or bathrooms in guest rooms and mainly outside the apartments. And read real international escorts. Or better said "models."

Here in VH, with "graces", few exceptions, everything is made clear and the sight of all.

So why here it has to be classified for free as "pornography".
And there in "voyeur" style?

[jabbath1987]

25 minutes ago, Amy3 said:

I don’t think a true voyeur style apt can compete with the amped up voyeur apt. I do think that VH has learned a lesson about the teneants being visible here. I haven’t seen it nearly as much as of late. I wonder if VH is in the process of putting an end to it. RLC and Camarads strictly forbid the tenants from being visible in the forums. 

Nope they are not 

[ze81]

4 hours ago, Sparkles said:

Nop, they aren't number one.. (and i don't even consider there a single house, since there are three persons living there - and it was that third that saved the house). And also i still can't forget the number of posts that alan violent reaction had give.. 

But since you talked about numbers (and i like to do this math), here is actual top10 and the top 11-19:

Linda&Leon&Carrie - Posts 2186 / Days Online 26 = Average 84,08/day
Mira&Henry - Posts 3224 / Days Online 41 = Average 78,63/day
Rock&Anastasia, Nyusha - Posts 4586 / Days Online 71 = Average 64,59/day
Lisa&Em - Posts 5863 / Days Online 84 = Average 69,80/day
Nina&Alan&Serena - Posts 7441 / Days Online 118 = Average 63,06/day
Anna&Alex, Bree&Drew - Posts 19040 / Days Online 304 = Average 62,63/day 
Jeff&Violet - Posts 2981 / Days Online 61 = Average 48,87/day
Edda&Joe - Posts 2641 / Days Online 57 = Average 46,35/day
Misty - Posts 5360 / Days Online 116 = Average 46,21/day
Karla&Arnie - Posts 445 / Days online 11 = Average 40,45/day

And the others:
Freddy - Posts 1785 / Days Online 46 = Average 38,80/day
Katie&Phil, Lena&Peter - Posts 3396 / Days Online 180 = Average 18,87/day
Zoi&Tim - Posts 2219 / Days Online 119 = Average 18,65/day
Clara&Stas - Posts 976 / Days Online 58 = Average 16,83/day
Sara&Jeka - Posts 4417 / Days Online 276 = Average 16,00/day
Maria&Grisha - Posts 5336 / Days Online 344 = Average 15,51/day
Chad&Todd - Posts 450 / Days Online 36 = Average 12,50/day
Alice&Pavel - Posts 117 / Days Online 15 = Average 7,80/day
Mika&Layne - Posts 3192 / Days Online 283 = Average 11,28/day

 

But you're talking about daily average number of posts correct?I was talking about the total number of posts..no average,nothing,just the total number..in that Nina,Alan and Serena with 7400 something they are second..and Alex and Ana place it's first but it's combining at least two,three houses of them.

[Sparkles]

23 minutes ago, ze81 said:

But you're talking about daily average number of posts correct?I was talking about the total number of posts..no average,nothing,just the total number..in that Nina,Alan and Serena with 7400 something they are second..and Alex and Ana place it's first but it's combining at least two,three houses of them.

But that means nothing... how can you say they are 'second' ... second or first of what??? total post in how many days??? one days?? two days??? and the others  at that some amount of days?? and the others in less days??? 

Just imagine for example mika and layne had 8000 posts in the first 4 months... but in the last time they had 200 ... is it fair to say thay they are in 2º of the number of posts don't having in matter that they are almost invisible  for a long time?

And of corse not talking about in all that other variables that are 'forgotten' only having the average posts