Stella & Stephan Part #1

[jabbath1987]

2 minutes ago, letsdothis said:

I say, sticks and stones, Jabba. Hard drive real estate is so cheap these days it's
laughable. I've seen 5TB portable hard drives for about $150. That's about $30
per TB. That's unreal. If you just want an extra TB or two, they start around $40
or $50.

I like large, but maybe they don't have to be UHD. Maybe just 1080p HD would
save on file size, but still allow for large dimensions and clear, sharp, detailed
pics. Just a thought.

I will consider it for the very special gifs. Maybe it is a solution to make a big gif subtopic in each topic for it. 

[jabbath1987]

Far too much camshows and less crazy parties lately. People no longer post much. Shows they are not interested in only camshows. 

[letsdothis]

1 minute ago, jabbath1987 said:

Far too much camshows and less crazy parties lately. People no longer post much. Shows they are not interested in only camshows. 

Which, IMHO, is a shame.

[letsdothis]

18 minutes ago, jabbath1987 said:

I will consider it for the very special gifs. Maybe it is a solution to make a big gif subtopic in each topic for it. 

I like it! I was talking about pics, but of course, it would be a good thing for GIFs, too.

[nack]

4 hours ago, letsdothis said:

I say, sticks and stones, Jabba. Hard drive real estate is so cheap these days it's
laughable. I've seen 5TB portable hard drives for about $150. That's about $30
per TB. That's unreal. If you just want an extra TB or two, they start around $40
or $50.

I like large, but maybe they don't have to be UHD. Maybe just 1080p HD would
save on file size, but still allow for large dimensions and clear, sharp, detailed
pics. Just a thought.

It's not about the Hard Drive.Large gif's require high bandwidth to load and can cause the page to load very slowly. I am on 50 Mbps so it works for me. My old broadband connection would take ages to load 35 mb gif. Ideal size is around 15 Mb but I like Jabbath's ultra hd gif's.

[letsdothis]

5 hours ago, waldi said:

Personally I don't care who posts the pics. But I agree that amount of them very often highly exceed the real demand. 3 or 4 pics for one stage can effectively depict the event, as that should be just advertisement, not full coverage,  just  imo

 

5 hours ago, ze81 said:

I like the pics(and gifts)of all of you all,but agree maybe at max 4,5 pics would be an good balance,but also understand that sometimes an user could like a lot the pics and posts an good amount.

5

What I hope for in pics & GIFs.

1. Many more pics and GIFs, unless they're near-duplicates from the same poster. Duplicates
   from different posters can't always be avoided and that's understandable. I say more because
   unlike some, I and maybe a few others will never have the opportunity to have a membership,
   unless I win one. So, I have to rely on you guys and gals to help me see what's going on, but 4
   or 5 pics can't usually do that. You all are definitely my eyes and I thank you for that.
2. Larger pics & GIFs, at least the size of your screen. I understand not everyone has the same size
   screen or resolution, but everyone can post fullscreen pics & GIFs. You just have to click on the
   fullscreen icon and record or cap in fullscreen mode. Easy peasy.
   Some of you may be familiar with Hope85. He only posts on RLC and his work is always the
   sharpest, crispest, clearest media around. It's really outstanding. All his GIFs are 1200 x 675
   give or take a pixel or two and they average 1.5-15MB in size. That's tiny for such a decent sized
   GIF. I only found one that was larger and it was only 18MB. I'd say that's a very good size to start
   with, IMO. I don't know what resolution he uses for those GIFs, but at least 720p, maybe 1080p.

[letsdothis]

9 hours ago, nack said:

It's not about the Hard Drive.Large gif's require high bandwidth to load and can cause the page to load very slowly. I am on 50 Mbps so it works for me. My old broadband connection would take ages to load 35 mb gif. Ideal size is around 15 Mb but I like Jabbath's ultra hd gif's.

That's a good point, nack. And IMHO, if there were less, as in no, thumbnail-sized
GIFs and 4x6ish sized pics, there would be a lot more bandwidth to load more
larger-sized and more useful pics and GIFs. And remember, bandwidth is not an
infinite entity, but it can be increased. And it would make sense that VH has allowed
for that in their business plan and subscription costs.

[nack]

[letsdothis]

13 hours ago, thedbear said:

Gentlemen, please! This has already been observed.
For the CB website they identify as brothers. Note however that this reference has already been excluded there.

'CrazyGoal': Some clothes off every goal, strap on show at 7 goals #bigboobs #teen #lovense #young #redhair #smalltits #bigtits #ass #lush #natural #skinny #bignipples

And for registration, no one from the CB (except those who have links here like me or any of us) had access to this situation.

So what we have there, is Stephan, Stella and Chris. Only that .

"Gentlemen, please! This has already been observed."

Bear, are you saying we can't talk about a subject that's already been brought up? That
if a subject has already been talked about once, it's off limits for further discussion? That
we can't talk about whatever we want to talk about, even if it's already been talked about?

Maybe someone has another opinion about that same discussion. Maybe someone or
some people weren't involved in that previous discussion because they didn't see the
previous conversation and now wish to input their opinions on the matter. I don't know
about you, but I have much too little time to even try to read all the current texts, let alone
try to research back 10, 20, 50 pages to see if a subject has been discussed before.

Maybe there should be a new conversation now because new people have opinions or
even those involved in the old discussion have new opinions. Maybe I'm repeating myself, 
but maybe we should talk about anything we choose to, even if it's been discussed before.

"For the CB website they identify as brothers."

I haven't read that particular CB site, but it probably doesn't say "brothers". Unless it's
a mistake.

[thedbear]

2 hours ago, letsdothis said:

"Gentlemen, please! This has already been observed."

Bear, are you saying we can't talk about a subject that's already been brought up? That
if a subject has already been talked about once, it's off limits for further discussion? That
we can't talk about whatever we want to talk about, even if it's already been talked about?

Maybe someone has another opinion about that same discussion. Maybe someone or
some people weren't involved in that previous discussion because they didn't see the
previous conversation and now wish to input their opinions on the matter. I don't know
about you, but I have much too little time to even try to read all the current texts, let alone
try to research back 10, 20, 50 pages to see if a subject has been discussed before.

Maybe there should be a new conversation now because new people have opinions or
even those involved in the old discussion have new opinions. Maybe I'm repeating myself, 
but maybe we should talk about anything we choose to, even if it's been discussed before.

"For the CB website they identify as brothers."

I haven't read that particular CB site, but it probably doesn't say "brothers". Unless it's
a mistake.

Hi, I'll get it. At first on CB site, Chirs was identified as Stephan's sister and so Stella's sister-in-law. What would be impediment of something more effective between them.
The issue here in controversy is all this.
And as I observed, this was also already removed there on the site CB, as we now see that the actions among the girls are getting more and more expressive and approaching (and fast) than was expected at the beginning.

Nothing against exhausting the subject in debates in the forum, but I have my vision particularly formed: only, Stephan, Stella and Chirs, there

The final actions of these three and among these three is that they will define better.

And yes, this was worked on the first pages of the furum. And today we have 107 and up. LOL

And I still want to see Chirs in VH cams and in real action. She really sets things on fire there. Did you see her riding Stella yesterday?
i

Edited January 22, 2018 by thedbear

[golfer06]

2 hours ago, letsdothis said:

"Gentlemen, please! This has already been observed."

Bear, are you saying we can't talk about a subject that's already been brought up? That
if a subject has already been talked about once, it's off limits for further discussion? That
we can't talk about whatever we want to talk about, even if it's already been talked about?

Maybe someone has another opinion about that same discussion. Maybe someone or
some people weren't involved in that previous discussion because they didn't see the
previous conversation and now wish to input their opinions on the matter. I don't know
about you, but I have much too little time to even try to read all the current texts, let alone
try to research back 10, 20, 50 pages to see if a subject has been discussed before.

Maybe there should be a new conversation now because new people have opinions or
even those involved in the old discussion have new opinions. Maybe I'm repeating myself, 
but maybe we should talk about anything we choose to, even if it's been discussed before.

"For the CB website they identify as brothers."

I haven't read that particular CB site, but it probably doesn't say "brothers". Unless it's
a mistake.

whatever translater he uses has been mixing up the sexes for a long time.

[thedbear]

5 minutes ago, golfer06 said:

whatever translater he uses has been mixing up the sexes for a long time.

Hi, I'll get it. At first on CB site, Chirs was identified as Stephan's sister and so Stella's sister-in-law. What would be impediment of something more effective between them.
Tks, golfer