Jump to content
*** New Software Coming Soon! Please Check for Important Information in the Read Me Section ***

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Amy3 said:

If someone normally has sex under a blanket, then we can complain about it, but we cannot run to VH and demand that they de-blanket. 

Here's something none of you really think about because you can't see it. It's fucking cold as shit in Russia. Many if not most of these apts are not heated well. When you see naked people it's very, very likely that they are quite cold. Try being naked in a cold room all day. It sucks! But they do it, cause if they wear clothes then people send tickets and they don't make any money. So, the next time you see a naked person realize it's likely that they are freezing their ass off. 

Oh stop it Amy you will have me feeling sorry for them soon lol

Posted
Just now, Robwin said:

Oh stop it Amy you will have me feeling sorry for them soon lol

Lol all I have to do is laugh about such crazy statements of course without any evidence like always. :biggrin:

Posted
10 minutes ago, Robwin said:

Definition of a prostitute is..     "A woman who engages in sexual activity for payment."

I wonder how that could apply on VH 😁😁

Here's where this logic fails:

1. Prostitutes can be men AND women.

2. A person or couple doesn't necessarily have to have sex in order to get paid on VH. They get paid on their views, NOT the amount of sex or the type of sex they have. Take Em and Sid for example; they haven't had sex in over two weeks but their traffic is still decent enough to get a paycheck. Would you consider them prostitutes?

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Amy3 said:

Aha! But see I don't pay them for sex, I pay to see what happens through the cam. They are under no obligation to have sex on cam. 

Very true but if nobody had sex no one would pay for seeing fuckall and VH would go broke lol....vicious circle eh

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Robwin said:

Definition of a prostitute is..     "A woman who engages in sexual activity for payment."

I wonder how that could apply on VH 😁😁

Lola??? 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Robwin said:

Oh stop it Amy you will have me feeling sorry for them soon lol

No need to feel sorry for them. The goal of voyeurims is realistic living. Payments for views opens the pathway to porn. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Robwin said:

Very true but if nobody had sex no one would pay for seeing fuckall and VH would go broke lol....vicious circle eh

RLC seem to be doing ok. I must admit I was a subscriber there for 6 months, felt a lot longer!

Posted
4 minutes ago, miscvoyeur said:

Here's where this logic fails:

1. Prostitutes can be men AND women.

2. A person or couple doesn't necessarily have to have sex in order to get paid on VH. They get paid on their views, NOT the amount of sex or the type of sex they have. Take Em and Sid for example; they haven't had sex in over two weeks but their traffic is still decent enough to get a paycheck. Would you consider them prostitutes?

They would think it took too much energy!

Posted
Just now, ze81 said:

People..want see less sex,porn what you want call it?...................go watch Rlc.solveddd:biggrin:.

Watching CJ or Em & Sid might be nice for them too :biggrin:

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Robwin said:

Very true but if nobody had sex no one would pay for seeing fuckall and VH would go broke lol....vicious circle eh

No, not broke! Look no further then RLC, the gold standard for proper voyeurism. Feel free to examine the numbers! There are plenty of voyeurs willing to pay for actual voyeur tv. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...