Roberta

[nicsjom]

Maybe  too late but

The black box is to give some privacy  ior the people  having natural needs   your money don't give the right to prohibit intimacy in the toilet

[Sparkles]

1 hour ago, groomy said:

Well, others close it with big black square. Perhaps this is VH requirement. Choice between VH warning and change camera position is obvious.

Doubt it (or it would be an enormous coincidence) the change on that cam only appear after just in video

[purplewrap]

4 hours ago, groomy said:

Well, others close it with big black square. Perhaps this is VH requirement. Choice between VH warning and change camera position is obvious.

Niet, I don't believe that for a second!  This particular cam was excellent for months! Hell, probably since the flat went online! The camera angle only changed because one person posted a video of Roberta perforing a cleansing douche. If he kept said video to himself, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

 

And those big black squares are extremely unappealing 👎

[jjkopite]

The thing about VH is that anything you can see, you can show!

[groomy]

29 minutes ago, purplewrap said:

Niet, I don't believe that for a second!  This particular cam was excellent for months! Hell, probably since the flat went online! The camera angle only changed because one person posted a video of Roberta perforing a cleansing douche. If he kept said video to himself, we wouldn't be having this conversation

Easily. When VH watching cams - for approval. There not that situation. This was shown few times - but 35 apartments, VH just missed the moment. But then there was a post. I'm sure Roberta sent him to the technical VH chat - situation was seen.

I just know that for some participants in VH it's not a problem at all. If piss-shit adds few bucks - then super. But they have a black square.

[golfer06]

bathroom cam should be where the circle is pointing at the tub. it still could pan some of the sink but would completely miss the toilet & no black square would be needed!

[purplewrap]

1 hour ago, groomy said:

Easily. When VH watching cams - for approval. There not that situation. This was shown few times - but 35 apartments, VH just missed the moment. But then there was a post. I'm sure Roberta sent him to the technical VH chat - situation was seen.

I just know that for some participants in VH it's not a problem at all. If piss-shit adds few bucks - then super. But they have a black square.

Nah, I still don't believe it. Please remeber that Roberta threatend to close with the shower curtain to prevent anyone seeing this. Until someone told her to move the camera angle.

Listen, Im not interested in any argument here 😊  You believe what you believe, and I will do the same.

If the change made it better for you, then that's great for you. It did the oposite for me, so I'm moving along.

🖖

 

[golfer06]

i don't think that anyone saw anything. i think that roberta thought someone saw something. after that she just didn't feel comfortable with that angle.

[Roberta]

 не переживайте. я исправлю камеру в ванной. просто нет доступа к этой камере и я не знаю как ее поставить. на днях решу эту проблему

[purplewrap]

1 hour ago, golfer06 said:

i don't think that anyone saw anything. i think that roberta thought someone saw something. after that she just didn't feel comfortable with that angle.

Sorry mate, it hurts me to say this, but you are definitely wrong on this one.

Please have a look on page 10, and you'll see what I mean.  The bloke has removed the video now, but you can clearly see the imprint of it in Roberta's reply.

Having said that,  I'm not going to speculate on how many watched that video.  All I can say with certainty is that at least one person watched it, and she was not amused at all.

🖖

[golfer06]

1 hour ago, purplewrap said:

Sorry mate, it hurts me to say this, but you are definitely wrong on this one.

Please have a look on page 10, and you'll see what I mean.  The bloke has removed the video now, but you can clearly see the imprint of it in Roberta's reply.

Having said that,  I'm not going to speculate on how many watched that video.  All I can say with certainty is that at least one person watched it, and she was not amused at all.

 

i'll have to take your word for it as i thought that i d/l'd it but can't find it.

[Guest]

16 hours ago, purplewrap said:

Sorry mate, it hurts me to say this, but you are definitely wrong on this one.

Please have a look on page 10, and you'll see what I mean.  The bloke has removed the video now, but you can clearly see the imprint of it in Roberta's reply.

Having said that,  I'm not going to speculate on how many watched that video.  All I can say with certainty is that at least one person watched it, and she was not amused at all.

🖖

Sorry but you seem to think that me posting a video was the issue, when infact if anything it highlighted a problem for the participant. Now you have referred to putting the cam back to it's original placement which I find a hilarious statement in that you condemn me for posting a video yet you are happy for to see the same thing live IMO is ridiculous to say the least.

The main aim of the video wasn't for scat porn which has been mentioned (I for sure ain't into that) it was more an interesting activity for some to see and also the pride that the tenant took in hygene before doing an anal activity, plus I think that it could give someone the idea of how to prepare for anal if they wanted to start that doesn't know what to do. Now I am of the belief that if that wasn't meant to be seen then they should either have something in place or not do it or hide i.e the black box or move the camera to where it is now or for to find a hidden area that isn't covered by cams otherwise it is classed as being acceptable for folk to see, capture and post (as long it is within the rules of CC).