Leora - Videos (2019)

[Leora-Fan]

1 hour ago, Mittsy1 said:

Merci billiboy pour cette explication mais pourquoi se fait-on bannir par cette entreprise proxénète alors que les sites que vous connaissez tous hébergent longuement des vidéos sans aucune réaction de la même entreprise proxénète?

was für kostenlose Cams,,,, da ist doch nicht mehr los!!!

es lohnt sich nicht über dafür Zeit zu opfern bei RLC reinzuschauen

[phantomcapsnet]

1 hour ago, Mittsy1 said:

Merci billiboy pour cette explication mais pourquoi se fait-on bannir par cette entreprise proxénète alors que les sites que vous connaissez tous hébergent longuement des vidéos sans aucune réaction de la même entreprise proxénète ?

tu parles de proxénétisme. RLC permet il de baiser des filles présentes sur le site ? Je veux bien casser mon livret A pour profiter de certaines opportunités

[zeus0101]

video plss..

[fga]

vídeo plss .....

[StnCld316]

6 hours ago, nounou said:

Why is that? Why they didn't put at least one free cam?

With no Free Cams no one is going to put their RLC Account at Risk for a Permanent Banning.  There was one Video placed of Leora having a Bath and RLC put the squeeze on the Uploader.  

[fga]

vídeo plss .....

[delon]

Cette vidéo est toujours visible sur HotScopes à la minute ou j 'écris. Pourquoi RLC se priverait de cette publicité : "LEORA EST DE RETOUR" à vos abonnements !

[fga]

vídeo plss ..... leora

 

[billiboy]

3 hours ago, Mittsy1 said:

Merci billiboy pour cette explication mais pourquoi se fait-on bannir par cette entreprise proxénète alors que les sites que vous connaissez tous hébergent longuement des vidéos sans aucune réaction de la même entreprise proxénète ?

This is something I am asking myself for a long time already. Most of the well known tubes post the videos which has been posted before on CC. So if somebody will be banned, it will be the the person who recorded the video (because it contains his digital signature) and not the operator of the pages. Beside the videos downloaded from CC (posted by you and others), CamsHunter at hotscopes is posting frequently videos from RLC premium cams, which I have not seen before in other forums or tubes. They have removed the watermark, but the dot patterns are still visible (but they look weaker as usual). I don't know, what source(es) they are using and why RLC is not able to stop them from uploading.

But to be honest: As I have no RLC subscription, I appreciate that they frequently upload videos from RLC premium cams and I appreciate as well that you started with the monthly upload of these videos for the users of this forum, who have problems to download them from hotscopes.
Honesty and respect or not ... in the end we all "steal" the property of RLC. 

[fga]

vídeo plss ...

[billiboy]

3 hours ago, jackgold said:

I think that it's not a problem if all cam  pay per view, the web is full of leora's video. Come on its not a tragedy

I agree with you. But still it's RLC's business to sell subscriptions and a lot of Leora fans are willing to subscribe as she is back, although (or maybe because) all cams in her apartment are premium.

I was always wondering that RLC allowed that Leora did most of her performances in front of free cams (and this is the only reason why the web is full of her videos). It was a good PR for RLC, but did not bring subscriptions. In all other couple apartments, we could see something in front of the free cams, but the most interesting things happened in front of the premium cams.

My apologies to all Leora fans, but I lost my interest in Leora just because you could see so much of her even in the free cams or find so much of her in the web. 

[jackgold]

exactly @billiboy