maxfactor Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 1 hour ago, SierraTM said: No my question is why are they on this project if they are not going to do anything sexual? This is not about Spain on lockdown, of course if u have your senses you will know they can't leave but they not being able to leave does not mean they should be still on the project. We knew for a long time these girls are not going to do anything sexual. And they are still here. That's my point. They were in the project when the lock down started. RLC has an obligation to keep them safe and provide accommodation. Rent free! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxfactor Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 1 hour ago, SierraTM said: Both of you should read my comment carefully. Let me give you this rather brash but still apt scenario. Say 2 girls in a whorehouse refuse to take customers. The whorehouse madame still keep these girls in the whorehouse because she says we cannot bring in anyone else. So you have 2 girls in a whorehouse who aren't whoring. And the reason they are there, according to u guys, is they can't bring in anyone else at the moment. Makes sense? If that makes sense to you under the current GLOBAL circumstances, then I can't help you...sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bnvhdsh29 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 1 hour ago, SierraTM said: No my question is why are they on this project if they are not going to do anything sexual? This is not about Spain on lockdown, of course if u have your senses you will know they can't leave but they not being able to leave does not mean they should be still on the project. We knew for a long time these girls are not going to do anything sexual. And they are still here. That's my point. This absolutely has everything to do with Spain being on lockdown. In the past yes, A&A would not likely have been extended. Circumstances have obviously changed and now they are not easily replaced. So it’s either A&A in that room or the room is very likely empty. RLC has most likely lowered their bar and chose to keep the girls. While they aren’t drawing a ton of views they bring in a lot more than an empty room. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SierraTM Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 (edited) il y a 14 minutes, maxfactor a dit : They were in the project when the lock down started. RLC has an obligation to keep them safe and provide accommodation. Rent free! RLC can still provide them housing but get them off the project. You still don't see my point, these girls have been doing absolutely nothing, showing us absolutely nothing (not even a pussy look if i were to believe) before the virus ran riot in Europe. And what RLC will do is so just let it be until they can't leave. That's it. Easy money. Edited April 1, 2020 by SierraTM edit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SierraTM Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 il y a 8 minutes, bnvhdsh29 a dit : This absolutely has everything to do with Spain being on lockdown. In the past yes, A&A would not likely have been extended. Circumstances have obviously changed and now they are not easily replaced. So it’s either A&A in that room or the room is very likely empty. RLC has most likely lowered their bar and chose to keep the girls. While they aren’t drawing a ton of views they bring in a lot more than an empty room. This is not about them being able to be replaced or not. You still don't get it. If a factory has 2 workers who do no work at all whatsoever, but because the factory can't bring in new employees, they still keep these workers simply because although they do no work, they at least fill the space? What logic is this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moos54 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 I am perhaps one of the only people to pay attention, but I have many pictures of their pussies when they take baths, it is not intentional on their part and precisely that is what makes all the charm of voyeurism 🙂 personally I take more pleasure in looking at Assol and Amelie in the house than Ginger and Kim who have to spend almost all day open legs 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moos54 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 8 minutes ago, SierraTM said: This is not about them being able to be replaced or not. You still don't get it. If a factory has 2 workers who do no work at all whatsoever, but because the factory can't bring in new employees, they still keep these workers simply because although they do no work, they at least fill the space? What logic is this? Coronavirus logic but maybe you don't look and read the news 😞 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SierraTM Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 il y a 7 minutes, moos54 a dit : Coronavirus logic but maybe you don't look and read the news 😞 Ahh so the COVID-19 situation actually rewards workers who do no work at all. Fantastic. Well, at least Trump can say he understands the COVID-19 situation much better than you. And that is really 'lowering the bar'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bnvhdsh29 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 20 minutes ago, SierraTM said: This is not about them being able to be replaced or not. You still don't get it. If a factory has 2 workers who do no work at all whatsoever, but because the factory can't bring in new employees, they still keep these workers simply because although they do no work, they at least fill the space? What logic is this? I get it just fine. You are keep pushing the idea that all of these girls are there to do sexual acts which is not correct. They are there to bring viewers and viewers buy subscriptions. Yes, doing sexual acts creates a lot of viewers and a lot of subscriptions and RLC loves it when the girls provide that but you know what doesn’t? Empty rooms. Empty rooms is a loss for RLC. So, as I’ve politely explained and will do so again, RLC would rather pay these girls to do what little they have been willing to do on camera as it brings more viewers then if they weren’t there at all. To fit your factory analogy; A&A aren’t refusing to work, they are just not as “productive” as the other workers. But they still produce more than no worker at all. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxfactor Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 23 minutes ago, SierraTM said: This is not about them being able to be replaced or not. You still don't get it. If a factory has 2 workers who do no work at all whatsoever, but because the factory can't bring in new employees, they still keep these workers simply because although they do no work, they at least fill the space? What logic is this? Please stop...you are embarrassing yourself. Under the current circumstances, I have never read such stupidity in my life. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moos54 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 3 minutes ago, SierraTM said: Ahh so the COVID-19 situation actually rewards workers who do no work at all. Fantastic. Well, at least Trump can say he understands the COVID-19 situation much better than you. And that is really 'lowering the bar'. Without wanting to be mean, I believe that you have just demonstrated to everyone how far your intelligence can go, and I believe that it does not exceed the belt 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SierraTM Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 il y a 6 minutes, bnvhdsh29 a dit : I get it just fine. You are keep pushing the idea that all of these girls are there to do sexual acts which is not correct. They are there to bring viewers and viewers buy subscriptions. Yes, doing sexual acts creates a lot of viewers and a lot of subscriptions and RLC loves it when the girls provide that but you know what doesn’t? Empty rooms. Empty rooms is a loss for RLC. So, as I’ve politely explained and will do so again, RLC would rather pay these girls to do what little they have been willing to do on camera as it brings more viewers then if they weren’t there at all. To fit your factory analogy; A&A aren’t refusing to work, they are just not as “productive” as the other workers. But they still produce more than no worker at all. If they are in a porn project, which means sexual content, and they do 'no sexual content', are they refusing to work? Are they merely less productive? And the girls are there to do sexual acts. If they are not, this website will ceases to exist. Especially when the 'pornhubs of the Interent' are pushing out all kinds of porn content (hidden & non-hidden voyeurism) and mostly for free. I see that our disagreement is on the issue of should employer retain non-working, or in your words, less-productive employees so that the desk will be filled and at least the office looks packed and other employees can make friends etc. In RLC's context, at least they have something to show on their cameras. I don't disagree with this except when you already know that these girls will not do any sexual content and will not even get naked (other than showering). When you keep girls who do some sexual content occasionally, once in awhile, longer than you probably should, I can't complain because your logic stands. But when you keep girls who do absolutely nothing, your logic don't stand. I believe this is the root of our disagreement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts