moos54 Posted April 1, 2020 Posted April 1, 2020 8 minutes ago, SierraTM said: This is not about them being able to be replaced or not. You still don't get it. If a factory has 2 workers who do no work at all whatsoever, but because the factory can't bring in new employees, they still keep these workers simply because although they do no work, they at least fill the space? What logic is this? Coronavirus logic but maybe you don't look and read the news 😞
SierraTM Posted April 1, 2020 Posted April 1, 2020 il y a 7 minutes, moos54 a dit : Coronavirus logic but maybe you don't look and read the news 😞 Ahh so the COVID-19 situation actually rewards workers who do no work at all. Fantastic. Well, at least Trump can say he understands the COVID-19 situation much better than you. And that is really 'lowering the bar'.
bnvhdsh29 Posted April 1, 2020 Posted April 1, 2020 20 minutes ago, SierraTM said: This is not about them being able to be replaced or not. You still don't get it. If a factory has 2 workers who do no work at all whatsoever, but because the factory can't bring in new employees, they still keep these workers simply because although they do no work, they at least fill the space? What logic is this? I get it just fine. You are keep pushing the idea that all of these girls are there to do sexual acts which is not correct. They are there to bring viewers and viewers buy subscriptions. Yes, doing sexual acts creates a lot of viewers and a lot of subscriptions and RLC loves it when the girls provide that but you know what doesn’t? Empty rooms. Empty rooms is a loss for RLC. So, as I’ve politely explained and will do so again, RLC would rather pay these girls to do what little they have been willing to do on camera as it brings more viewers then if they weren’t there at all. To fit your factory analogy; A&A aren’t refusing to work, they are just not as “productive” as the other workers. But they still produce more than no worker at all. 2
maxfactor Posted April 1, 2020 Posted April 1, 2020 23 minutes ago, SierraTM said: This is not about them being able to be replaced or not. You still don't get it. If a factory has 2 workers who do no work at all whatsoever, but because the factory can't bring in new employees, they still keep these workers simply because although they do no work, they at least fill the space? What logic is this? Please stop...you are embarrassing yourself. Under the current circumstances, I have never read such stupidity in my life. 3
moos54 Posted April 1, 2020 Posted April 1, 2020 3 minutes ago, SierraTM said: Ahh so the COVID-19 situation actually rewards workers who do no work at all. Fantastic. Well, at least Trump can say he understands the COVID-19 situation much better than you. And that is really 'lowering the bar'. Without wanting to be mean, I believe that you have just demonstrated to everyone how far your intelligence can go, and I believe that it does not exceed the belt 1
SierraTM Posted April 1, 2020 Posted April 1, 2020 il y a 6 minutes, bnvhdsh29 a dit : I get it just fine. You are keep pushing the idea that all of these girls are there to do sexual acts which is not correct. They are there to bring viewers and viewers buy subscriptions. Yes, doing sexual acts creates a lot of viewers and a lot of subscriptions and RLC loves it when the girls provide that but you know what doesn’t? Empty rooms. Empty rooms is a loss for RLC. So, as I’ve politely explained and will do so again, RLC would rather pay these girls to do what little they have been willing to do on camera as it brings more viewers then if they weren’t there at all. To fit your factory analogy; A&A aren’t refusing to work, they are just not as “productive” as the other workers. But they still produce more than no worker at all. If they are in a porn project, which means sexual content, and they do 'no sexual content', are they refusing to work? Are they merely less productive? And the girls are there to do sexual acts. If they are not, this website will ceases to exist. Especially when the 'pornhubs of the Interent' are pushing out all kinds of porn content (hidden & non-hidden voyeurism) and mostly for free. I see that our disagreement is on the issue of should employer retain non-working, or in your words, less-productive employees so that the desk will be filled and at least the office looks packed and other employees can make friends etc. In RLC's context, at least they have something to show on their cameras. I don't disagree with this except when you already know that these girls will not do any sexual content and will not even get naked (other than showering). When you keep girls who do some sexual content occasionally, once in awhile, longer than you probably should, I can't complain because your logic stands. But when you keep girls who do absolutely nothing, your logic don't stand. I believe this is the root of our disagreement.
SierraTM Posted April 1, 2020 Posted April 1, 2020 il y a 16 minutes, moos54 a dit : Without wanting to be mean, I believe that you have just demonstrated to everyone how far your intelligence can go, and I believe that it does not exceed the belt Oh my intelligence is definitely and by far, lower than yours. I stand in awe of your presence and I long to worship your intelligence. You are so kind and so helpful and filled with RLC knowledge. And as always, you are always correct.
moos54 Posted April 1, 2020 Posted April 1, 2020 9 minutes ago, SierraTM said: Oh my intelligence is definitely and by far, lower than yours. I stand in awe of your presence and I long to worship your intelligence. You are so kind and so helpful and filled with RLC knowledge. And as always, you are always correct. sorry to want to question your intelligence again there are at least three of us who want to explain to you that in the current context, that is to say a planetary health problem that we call pandemic and which is simply killing thousands of people , having Assol and Amelie at B4 will always be better than having empty beds, because it is surely impossible to replace them at the moment We understood that you wanted girls who masturbate all the times, but you will not have them, you will have to get used to this idea 1
Noldus Posted April 1, 2020 Author Posted April 1, 2020 It is not easy to satisfy everyone Some want the most real life possible and that's maybe what A&A is showing now Others want more sexual activities as more of the girls do - and some of them too much. Some want guys in the girls (GOV) apartments and some want the couples apartments (COV) to be roommates apartments. Fortunately, we have a good mix of all the past, so just pick what you want to lock at 😉 5
nagachilli2 Posted April 1, 2020 Posted April 1, 2020 54 minutes ago, SierraTM said: RLC can still provide them housing but get them off the project. You still don't see my point, these girls have been doing absolutely nothing, showing us absolutely nothing (not even a pussy look if i were to believe) before the virus ran riot in Europe. And what RLC will do is so just let it be until they can't leave. That's it. Easy money. What makes you believe RLC can provide them with alternative housing in Barca? ...It would cost RLC more to re-house them than to keep them in the project because, in your own words, they do absolutely nothing, so wouldn't need to pay them any bonus money, just the basic. ...And would you really prefer to look at an empty room? 2
SierraTM Posted April 1, 2020 Posted April 1, 2020 il y a 1 minute, Noldus a dit : It is not easy to satisfy everyone Some want the most real life possible and that's maybe what A&A is showing now Others want more sexual activities as more of the girls do - and some of them too much. Some want guys in the girls (GOV) apartments and some want the couples apartments (COV) to be roommates apartments. Fortunately, we have a good mix of all the past, so just pick what you want to lock at 😉 Noldus, I just want girls who are in this project, be willing to 'create sexual content' and not do absolutely nothing and hang around until their time is up. Such girls should have no place in this project. This should not even be a preference, like the ones you mention, this should be the minimum requirement. 2
SierraTM Posted April 1, 2020 Posted April 1, 2020 il y a 2 minutes, nagachilli2 a dit : What makes you believe RLC can provide them with alternative housing in Barca? ...It would cost RLC more to re-house them than to keep them in the project because, in your own words, they do absolutely nothing, so wouldn't need to pay them any bonus money, just the basic. ...And would you really prefer to look at an empty room? You misunderstood me. I believe RLC works this way (correct me if I am wrong). When they remove the names of the girls but these girls still stay in the house, they are off the project. And would you really prefer to look at an empty room? Of cos I don't Naga, but in all fairness, what there's to see anyway? And this 'empty room' argument is doing subscribers no favours.
Recommended Posts