Jump to content

It Has Begun: Russia Invades Ukraine #1


Recommended Posts

WWW.MSN.COM

1. Support Ukraine militarily, 2. Bankrupt Putin's war machine, 3. Freeze & seize Russia's finances, 4. Kick Russia out of every financial institution.

At the end of the article--

The chess grandmaster took Germany to task for its alleged appeasement of Putin: "Germany still refusing to send weapons to Ukraine after funding Putin's war machine for years, or even to remove Russia from SWIFT. Neutrality between good and evil sides with evil, always."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, happyone said:

Alle führenden Politiker der westlichen Welt sollten Sanktionen gegen Putin und seine Kumpane direkt anvisieren und mit Sanktionen nur gegen Russland aufhören.  

IMO Putin wird nur reagieren, wenn er persönlich verletzt ist--

Unser schwacher Präsident Biden muss sich an die Spitze stellen und das Kommando übernehmen.

WWW.MSN.COM

Der Gesetzgeber sagte, die Sanktionen hätten weiter gehen sollen, indem sie Wladimir Putin selbst ins Visier genommen und Russland aus SWIFT geworfen hätten.

 

 

 

Nur US-Dummköpfe können so etwas schreiben. Putin direkt und persönlich belasten, ich bin dafür. Andere denken noch an Verhandlungen mit dem noch "amtierenden russischen Präsidenten" - ok. Für mich ist Putin Kriegsverbrecher und kein Verhandlungspartner mehr - Punkt.

Aus dem SWIFT werfen ist zu früh, viele Firmen haben noch Forderungen an russische Forderungen, die dann total weg wären. Es zählt Intelligenz und keine US-typische Rambo-Aktion. Biden macht das klug und richtig. Leute die das nicht erkennen sind einfach nur Idioten. Politik wie in den letzten 6 Jahren unter Arschloch und US-Neo-Nazi Trump.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, corboblanc said:

ukro-nazi militias, financed and armed by nato and the united states in 2014!!!!🙄

54rr.jpg

zqi0.png

1d2r.jpg

xres.jpg

Those are probably Russians disguised as Ukrainians.  That's one of Putin's favorite KGB tactics. A tactic to justify his invasion of Ukraine. Trudeau used the same lie to justify his use of force against the protesting truckers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

il y a 11 minutes, Ridgerunner a dit :

Those are probably Russians disguised as Ukrainians.  That's one of Putin's favorite KGB tactics. A tactic to justify his invasion of Ukraine. Trudeau used the same lie to justify his use of force against the protesting truckers.

I've heard a lot of stupidity in my life, but such a denial of truth is collector's items!!!!!
and they are Ukrainians disguised as pro-Russians?🤨

lzmt.jpg

p1id.jpg

r1x0.jpg

l64j.jpg

edmc.jpg

xi4p.jpg

094g.jpg

yz3m.jpg

 

tzbm.jpg

r1fo.jpg

3mm7.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being a Greek , one of the first things you NEED to learn is history as the only way to explain the present and foresee / predict the future is knowing the past…Here it is then about what’s happening at the moment briefly , obviously explained by a professor which you can find his name at the end of the session and definitely since anyone can have his/her own opinion , this is some of the most reasonable explanations   ( a personal opinion of course presented in a Q&A session making it easier for reading .) 
 
 - Did Russia surprise its European allies?
 Only those who wanted to be surprised.
 
 - What is Putin looking for?  What are its main goals?

 "To put Ukraine in a state of exclusion, as was the case in 1955 with Austria, which was forced to become a new state after World War II, to be strictly outside NATO and subject to specific obligations in terms of  armaments , to adopt the support of a new government that will keep Ukraine as a neutral armament zone that would threaten the existence and security of the Russian Federation.
 
 And of course it will, because the West is limited to verbal threats.  These measures he imposed are ridiculous, Borel's statements are on the verge of provocation.  Who is the loser in this case?  The unfortunate Ukrainians who were the useful idiots.  Putin has won, the Americans have won and their shale gas with which they intend to flood the markets of Europe.  The Europeans are lost, because they will pay dearly, financially, for this tension in Ukraine.
 
 The reality is that the West made a huge mistake that overturned Kissinger's policy of 72, which was to drive China away from Russia, and adopted another policy that threw the Russian Federation into China's arms.  Given this, I'm particularly afraid that the next "dish" on the Chinese table this time will be Taiwan.  To this huge Eurasian alliance, Iran was added and North Korea, which has recently increased its missile tests, also found a very comfortable reception.  "How much naivety did it take to get here?"
 
 
 - Referring to "funny measures".  What does it mean ?
 "Because exactly these measures can not hurt the Russian economy.  Conversely, if you think that oil has reached a historic high since 2014 at $ 102, 103, 104, you realize that Moscow's treasuries are filling up because of the new prices.  That is, we idiots are financing Putin's war.  That's what we're doing."
 
 - Do you territorially believe that Russia will be limited to Donetsk?  Because it also hits areas outside this zone.  Is there a risk that the conflict will go beyond the prescribed limits?
 "But it is already out of bounds, the conflict is already widespread.  At the moment, troops have arrived near Kiev, they are actually besieging Kiev - they are Russian troops that started from Belarus.  On the one hand, Russian troops are coming down from the north to the capital - it is a two-hour drive.  And on the other hand, from the Crimea, they enter towards the shores of the Sea of Azov.
 
 The Russian troops on the side of Little Donbass - I say Little Donbass because Lugansk and Donetsk on their current borders do not cover all the provinces to which they belong - from there begins a new wave to the shores of the Azov.  So what is left of Ukraine?  And where is NATO?  Biden said he would not send troops to Ukraine and told us with "equally great courage" that he would defend the last inch of NATO territory.  "Only NATO territories are not threatened by Putin."

 

What is the next day for Ukraine?
 It is best to neutralize.
 
 - Enter a government controlled by Putin and essentially talk about a satellite state?
 This is the equivalent of the American Monroe Doctrine.  I will remind you that the Americans demand that the Monroe doctrine be observed and the Russians demand that the "Near Abroad" doctrine be observed.  The doctrine was named after President James Monroe, who first articulated it , he said further efforts by European nations to colonize or interfere in the political affairs of North or South American states could be seen as an offensive that would require US intervention.
 
 Putin's last sentence in the second sermon is a nightmare.  Pay attention to what he said: if anyone dares to obstruct our efforts, it will have such consequences that he will not forget them, they will be unprecedented in history.  It is a threat to World War III.  "Stop doing my job" that is.  "To ensure my existential security as I mean it" and added at the end "We are ready for all the results".
 
 What is the biggest immediate consequence for Europe?
 "Europe must first be taken seriously.  Here, too, a phrase and a mood seem to emerge very seriously.  The phrase of President Macron who said that NATO is "brain dead" and proved it convincingly.  And the intention to create a Euromilitary - but a real Euromilitary that can stand on its own two feet.
 
 The immediate consequence is that "the Polar Bear will hit our backs".  Economically, in terms of energy we will "cool down".  And we will pay extra for everything because energy is the source of the financial chain, the beginning.  "Europe will pay for its innocence, its nonsense."
 
 - Is Ukraine alone in this war, or can it hope militarily for some allies?
 "Do you see anyone supporting her?  The poor ambassador shouted in Turkey "close the Dardanelles".  I would not like to be in the position of Turkey either.  He has to decide who to go with and who to leave.  "And it has open fronts in Libya, in Syria, in Iraq."
 
 - Does Ukraine have any hope at all, not to win but to save something?  As the Russian army is powerful compared to the military forces of Ukraine.
 "I do not sincerely believe that Putin is in the mood to create a military occupation in Ukraine.  All he wants is to neutralize the country.  This is a political decision that must be reinforced by the creation of political structures that support Ukraine's neutrality.  "I do not think he wants to conquer it."
 
 - Yes, but he wants to control it

 "It simply came to our notice then.  The "near abroad" was this.  When James Baker (the US Secretary of State under Reagan and Bush) promised Gorbachev that they would not move an inch east and that the Warsaw Pact countries would remain neutral, this was not kept.  We do not yet understand the concept of power on this planet.  We are left only to incense international law, which international law, as Grotius (Danish lawyer) used to say, is what will help us turn the jungle into a zoo.  But he never said he would castrate carnivores to stop being carnivores.  We need a team of guards, who will have the tools and the power to separate the carnivores from the herbivores and the carnivores.
 
 Good international governance is an alloy of power and law.  What did we do in the West?  We let Turkey invade Cyprus, we let Turkey declare an independent state in Cyprus, to transfer an army to the independent state that it recognizes.  It also entered Famagusta, and all this against at least five UN Security Council resolutions, which the West viewed and "whistled stealthily", with its selective sensitivities towards some and not others.

 

Ideally, would Putin want a "second Belarus" in Ukraine?  That is, a leader who is effectively controlled by him?
 Clearly.  And because Putin has another 15-16 years, he could create such puppets for Ukraine and support them accordingly.
 
 - Does Putin have reason to fear any sanctions from the West, or is the profit he has already made from the invasion greater anyway?
 "But it already has agreements with a huge country.  With the Chinese market.  And how many others we do not know, and how many others will be done.  China is not just any market.  It is 1.2 billion people.  An economy that grows by 6.5%. "
 
 - If Russia turns to its new economic ally, China, is there a chance - even if the situation normalizes - that Europe will not have a priority in terms of gas supply, and we will find ourselves with long-term shortages?
 "There, our American friends will take care to flood us with shale gas.  To sell their own, because gas prices are so high that theirs can be competitive.  There is also nuclear energy - let's say France has no problem.  Fusion will come soon, but it will take a decade.  And of course the jokes about green energy and green horses - you realize 10% to 12% will cover. "
 
 - Germany, of course, on the other hand, had decided that this year it would put an end to nuclear power plants.  He had decided after the accident in Fukushima.
 "As he had decided to stop lignite, and took it until 2048."

 

And there you have some explanations and what maybe actually is happening .The Q&A is done with Professor Ioannis Mazis, President of the Department of Turkish Studies & Contemporary Asian Studies at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, specializing in Economic Geography and Geopolitical Theory, outlines the current situation and the most likely, immediate future of Ukraine, Europe and international energy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Il y a 5 heures, Ridgerunner a dit :

Photos don't prove who the victims are nor who did the killings. 

dear friend, you are really an idiot going even towards debility!!!!🤨 it is the massacre of the pro-russian populations killed by the ukro-nazis financed and armed by the united states in 2014!!!! do you have internet? do you know how to search? but where do you come from to say such nonsense, nasty poutine and nice nato?!!!!! putin is only defending himself from an encirclement of russia, by nato and the united states, directly threatening the russian population, and this despite nato's non-expansion treaty in eastern europe, treaty who has never been respected by the United States, who keep coming to shit on poutine's feet!!!! the only people responsible for what is happening are the United States, which did not hesitate to organize a coup in 2014 to remove the pro-Russian president and replace him with a straw man, by arming numerous nazi militias in ukraine!!!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...