Howard

If she can fit that bottle up her hoo-haa, game over.

Whatever works! It's not about you. I'm just saying make the d/l process as simple as possible. As to how many have to deal with spam/malware, proceed with caution (no hand-holding here). At the very least, those who choose to roll the dice and d/l from that site should immediately clear their cache and delete cookies used within that hour (option available in Chrome).

Copy & Paste doesn't work (I'm not the only one saying this). Re-post is useless if using the same domain (use another domain). Upload the file to the domain that 98% of other users use. If it gets pulled after a day, S.O.L. to the person who missed it (that's not on you). Even better, BECOME A CC MEMBER AND UPLOAD THE FILE TO THE CC SERVER!! The file will be available for a looong time. It's only $20. The cost of 4 trips to Starbucks for a fancy drink that probably is bad for you (all that sugar and whipped cream). Don't make things difficult. Most people wont/don't go through the steps required to get to the file (you graciously uploaded). It becomes a meaningless endeavor (its already a thankless endeavor) if only 10-20% of the CC viewership are willing to go through multiple acrobatics to retrieve the file (and to roll the dice through the spam/malware path to finally get the file). I'm done talking sense.

F-secure...NOT the best program for its job. Neither for some may be Malwarebytes or Defender. All I can say is for the past 15+ years, I've used Malwarebytes on my home computers and 11 networked stations (and server) in my office. Between Malwarebytes and ESET NOD 32, we've been virus & spam free. Data on these computers much more valuable then trying to download any smut on the interwebs.

IMO, you're making it too difficult to d/l the file. Uploads are always appreciated but if one has to jump through hoops to get it, that defeats the purpose. Also, DMCA pull down is the cause of an RLC request. You can give a step-by-step how to d/l a file you uploaded. But guess what...RLC can also read! No, couldn't d/l the file. I will also pass on your (or anyone's) future uploads to that domain not only because they're difficult to get to, but often to get there, I encounter spam/malware alerts. I have confidence your upload is clean. But too many pot-holes to encounter on the way to get to the destination.

Don't wish either one bad. But as a couple they wont last. She's young (22 yrs) and vulnerable (and inexperienced in life). Yes, I can tell by her behavior/mannerisms. He's about 5 years older, has hash marks on his belt from life experiences, and he can be controlling. I question if his signs of affection (i.e. bringing her flowers) isn't due in part to his controlling nature. Again, other then observing/studying both their behaviors, I know nothing about them.

While I can't argue with what you said, most sex between couples are repetitive (few have imagination to mix things up). With that said, if there were VH awards for sexiest figure & best cocksucker, I'd have to nominate Clara.

Don't take it personally. Some people (like myself) are sensitive to what we d/l on our computers. Foolish of me to spend good money on anti-spam and/or anti-virus software and not take heed. I'm not saying your file is bad. But getting to the file is a different story. I'll take the well paved road to a destination vs one with pot holes that may damage my car.

Of course it worked for you - you uploaded the file!! Possibly you don't have spam/malware software loaded on your computer (or another similar set-up). I'm just reporting what my results are.

I did a copy and past on the URL you provided and a c&p on just the domain name. Got a malware alert. Proceed at your own risk (I'm not a risk taker).

Link (C&P) no workie. UPDATE: Malwarebytes wont allow me to go to the domain name.

Appreciate the upload but there are two problems I'm having (and maybe others): 1. Its slow as can be (it feels like its 1992 and I'm on a 28.8K dial-up modem). Maybe use another service. 2. During the slow download process, I get a network error after 14 - 15MB (happened 3x).

Which pussy would you pet?

Read this - https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pornhub-made-vpn-140000592.html PornHub just released a FREE VPN. On a related note, RLC has limited their data stream (output) for some VPNs. It's as if you're on a fast 33.6 modem or slow DSL line. At least that has been my experience lately using one of the VPNs I subscribe to.

You've just described a porn actor/actress. But it goes deeper then that. An educated guess is their behavior was established at home in a manner unacceptable to society. Possible abused by a family member, lack of attention from a family member, influenced by actions from friends/peers. They can have sex 3-4x/day if its an activity (I refer to my porn actress example). Unfortunately for them, banging that often daily ruins most for any chance of finding a long lasting, meaningful relationship involving love and affection. If I able to ask any one question to these folks (mostly the gals), I would want to know about their upbringing from ages 8-16 yrs. Something happened to them during these years that was unconventional (to say the least).

Thanks. Unlike many, I watch VH and RLC to observe behavior. The banging is secondary. I'm fascinated how today's generation behaves vs to when I was in my late teens/early 20s (which was 20+ yrs ago). Of course, social media has a role in what we see here. How many girls/guys read text messages or do other activities on their phones while banging?! Intercourse has become an activity (like ping-pong or drinking). For some, it takes second place as when their phone rings or they get a chime of an incoming text, he/she (mostly gals) reach for the phone. For the majority, affection or love has nothing to do with getting pounded by a cock. Most of these kids don't know how much more satisfying sex is with love and affection (and foreplay). Which, in part, explains why they're OK banging in front of a camera. Kinda like porn stars who view sex as a job (very few have lasting, meaningful relationships).

Not only are those numbers un-sustainable, but they are not realistic. On a very good month, maybe $3,000 (divided by number of residents). Which may be OK considering their major expenses are food and cell phone bill (no rent). But only a very few get to that level. On a side note, recall when Miri & Henry first came on-line? VH viewers couldn't get enough of them. Now, I bet their viewership is down 30% (if not more). The novelty of what they brought has leveled off.

Outcasts...as in they don't fit in with main stream society. Maybe they had a rough childhood, psychological problems due to poor upbringing, come from a broken home, hang with the wrong crowd, etc. If they're poor, *I* think much has to do with lack of motivation to work (learn a trade). But their problem isn't lack of wealth. IMO, it's lack of structure (whether due to upbringing, schooling, etc). As for computers and cell phones, EVERY teenager and 20-something finds a way to buy one. In the 90s, every kid I knew no matter their financial status had a Sony Walkman. This generation, it's the cell phone (and fancy, over-priced sneakers).

Based on the info you have and the 'guess-timate' of the pay structure, I'm even more convinced residents of these apartments are mostly outcasts (yes, there are exceptions). If they are willing to take so little for "putting out" so much (and have no shame doing so based on society's values), maybe I should be more sympathetic to their issues and not judge. I miss those 'innocent' days of JenniCam. 🙂

I wouldn't go that much in depth calculating viewers per hour based on CC data (variables get skewed going that far in using CC data). But I think, based on no other information available, CC's numbers (on the surface) give a general idea which apartments are most visited/popular.