Jump to content

Delete the Archives!


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Amy3 said:

Non, j'ai jamais dit que VH exploite illégalement ou illicitement personnes. Je ne pense que les locataires se faire arnaquer par avoir par un gestionnaire entre eux et VH, mais je vais épargner cet argument pour un autre sous-thème. Les locataires sont tous ici sous leur propre gré et ils peuvent partir si elles le souhaitent. Mais, je dirai que cela ne donne pas VH ou les principalement les gestionnaires du droit d'être humain aux locataires. VH a un devoir de protéger les locataires contre toute sorte de contrainte ou formes de corruption ou de chantage qu'un gestionnaire potentiel pourrait être coupable. Et non, ce n'est pas une notion absurde comme nous l'avons déjà vu de telles choses. 

You will never be able to stop saying "white" at the beginning of your post and "black" at the end. Too tiring for me
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Amy3 said:

I suppose the right thing to do would be to look at RLC, given that they do not have an archive. I think there is no doubt that many of their tenants do in fact rely on RLCs policies to protect their content from spreading to the internet. Perhaps they would not be interested in being a tenant if they had an archive. 

@Foamy T. Squirrel @StnCld316

Do you think the tenants on RLC would be impacted by the pretense of an archive? If they started one, do you think any of them would leave? 

I think I can undercut my own argument about the progression part. It doesn’t appear that a lack of an archive amounts to a greater willingness to be more kinky. 

Considering we are a just a soap opera digest here, just like what you see at the grocery store check-out counter, I'm perfectly happy for RLC, VHTV, VV and the others to use us as their archive. 😊

Once it's on the Internet, it's never going to be erased, but I do admit, VHTV's archive will make it easier for stalkers or future employers or opposing candidates to dig up dirt on the tenants.

If they need more dirt, they'll have to cough up the big $20 a year to join the CamCaps elite!

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Amy3 said:

I suppose the right thing to do would be to look at RLC, given that they do not have an archive. I think there is no doubt that many of their tenants do in fact rely on RLCs policies to protect their content from spreading to the internet. Perhaps they would not be interested in being a tenant if they had an archive. 

@Foamy T. Squirrel @StnCld316

Do you think the tenants on RLC would be impacted by the pretense of an archive? If they started one, do you think any of them would leave? 

I think I can undercut my own argument about the progression part. It doesn’t appear that a lack of an archive amounts to a greater willingness to be more kinky. 

If RLC kept a Video Archive I don't think it would not have much impact.  The Tenant has already completed the scene so people can watch it in the 24 Hour Replay or Video if they had an Archive.

The only trouble with Video Archives are they will always find their way all over the Internet as People can Download the Videos and place them on whatever Third Party Host they please to put it on. The Video usually stays on the Servers until the Copyright Holder Orders a DMCA Takedown of the Content. There are way far to many Websites that have these Videos that it would be an Impossible Task for the Copyright Holder to get each and everyone one of them.   I don't know exactly how much a DMCA Takedown Order Costs but DMCA does not provide the Service for Free.  Most Third Party Sites when they receive a DMCA Takedown Order they Remove the Video, then they Rename the Video and Re-Upload it on the Server which in turn will give it a different Hashtag. That way the Video always stays alive. The Copyright Holder would have to keep issuing DMCA Orders on the same Video Multiple Times.   It's a Task the Copyright Holders can never win unless they take the Servers Operators to Court to have the Servers Shut Down. In Most cases it's a costly process that could be more of a headache than it's worth.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Amy3 said:

It wasn’t meant to be a poll question. I know already how you guys feel about it. The point was for you guys to consider if it’s possible that the mere presence of the archive impacts the tenant pool and the level of progression. 

Well it that case i also have an opinion,honestly don't see how the presence of the archive would impact the tenants pool and level of progression,for exemple the archive won't save any resident from house be closed if he,her,them are inactive.would say that in some cases it's even an help for them to watch and see what type of things can be done and how it look on cams,seen several residents and guests watching videos in archive etc.And it's just blood cool to have it at our disposal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, StnCld316 said:

If RLC kept a Video Archive I don't think it would not have much impact.  The Tenant has already completed the scene so people can watch it in the 24 Hour Replay or Video if they had an Archive.

The only trouble with Video Archives are they will always find their way all over the Internet as People can Download the Videos and place them on whatever Third Party Host they please to put it on. The Video usually stays on the Servers until the Copyright Holder Orders a DMCA Takedown of the Content. There are way far to many Websites that have these Videos that it would be an Impossible Task for the Copyright Holder to get each and everyone one of them.   I don't know exactly how much a DMCA Takedown Order Costs but DMCA does not provide the Service for Free.  Most Third Party Sites when they receive a DMCA Takedown Order they Remove the Video, then they Rename the Video and Re-Upload it on the Server which in turn will give it a different Hashtag. That way the Video always stays alive. The Copyright Holder would have to keep issuing DMCA Orders on the same Video Multiple Times.   It's a Task the Copyright Holders can never win unless they take the Servers Operators to Court to have the Servers Shut Down. In Most cases it's a costly process that could be more of a headache than it's worth.

Honestly Stn don't imagine rlc having an video archive being them as strictly with videos,pics share etc,and of course(sadly)any archive tat they would make available would be costly..probraby(and seing how replay Its 30$ monthly)would cost about te same.Regard th videos being available in internet because of it..Totaly honesty seen a lot more Rlc videos than VHTV ones in other sites.Agree that such thing as an big video archive would not fallow the Rlc standards of "acting".But have some hopes that one day VH will be big enought and competitive to the point that at least the replay feature will be available for free or very cheap at least as it should be(Rlc).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ze81 said:

Honestly Stn don't imagine rlc having an video archive being them as strictly with videos,pics share etc,and of course(sadly)any archive tat they would make available would be costly..probraby(and seing how replay Its 30$ monthly)would cost about te same.Regard th videos being available in internet because of it..Totaly honesty seen a lot more Rlc videos than VHTV ones in other sites.Agree that such thing as an big video archive would not fallow the Rlc standards of "acting".But have some hopes that one day VH will be big enought and competitive to the point that at least the replay feature will be available for free or very cheap at least as it should be(Rlc).

RLC doesn't have a Video Archive.  If they did they'd have a bigger headache than they already have fighting to keep their Content off the Internet Websites.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, StnCld316 said:

RLC doesn't have a Video Archive.  If they did they'd have a bigger headache than they already have fighting to keep their Content off the Internet Websites.

as we know rlc is totally stupid. i'll never forget that they blocked me 3 times from the free rooms & that they shut you guys down a while ago. they suck!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, StnCld316 said:

RLC doesn't have a Video Archive.  If they did they'd have a bigger headache than they already have fighting to keep their Content off the Internet Websites.

Yes I know,was just imaginating an situation were they would have.Maybe if they fallow an more open mind filosofy(Regard allowing some content shared etc)things could be not as bad,usualy the forbidden things are the most wanted(something like that),I don't know others but seen a lot more videos of Rlc in internet than of VH,but also true rlc it's an much bigger site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ze81 said:

Yes I know,was just imaginating an situation were they would have.Maybe if they fallow an more open mind filosofy(Regard allowing some content shared etc)things could be not as bad,usualy the forbidden things are the most wanted(something like that),I don't know others but seen a lot more videos of Rlc in internet than of VH,but also true rlc it's an much bigger site.

The only RLC Videos you find mainly on other Websites is Old Content that has just been Renamed and Re-Uploaded and given a different Hashtag Code. But no matter what Voyeur Site the Video is from it's an Impossible Never Ending Task for the Copyright Holder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Amy3 said:

Yes, I agree. Without the archive the less chance the content will spread, thus making it more private for the tenant. A person would be hard pressed to find all of the sex videos of Misty on the internet for example, but because the archive exists, every single one of them are there and only a download away. If a brand new bad actor came into the scene, he’d have access to all of it with a simple sub versus having to scour the web for it or ask around here for downloads. 

Videos can still spread without a Video Archive. All a Person needs is Screen Capturing Software.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ze81 said:

replay feature will be available for free or very cheap at least as it should be(Rlc).

Replay is free now on RLC? I always thought it cost an impertinent 30$ extra to your sub per month. So you pay around 80$ for RLC and do not even have an archive. Did they change it?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Amy3 said:

Oh yes for sure! But without the archive the ability of people to spread the content is far, far less. Like my example, you would not be able to find every sex scene of Misty on the internet without the archive. 

Without Video Archives the Content wouldn't be as much but it would still be present.  Just about every Website and Tube Site that has Porn Videos you'll find Video Content from RLC, VHTV, VV and Camarads in large Amounts but just not named with the Tenants Names.  They relable them as something different like BF screws GF or Father Screwing Step Daughter  they make it difficult to find but it is out there in large amounts from the Voyeur Sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...