Should VH cap the number of apt online?

[Amy3]

🖕

[Robwin]

2 minutes ago, Amy3 said:

Do you think VHTV would be a better experience if they capped the number of apts online to say 10? 

I know that when I was watching I had to know everything. Because of the number of apts that became an impossible task and it really did cause me to lose interest in what was going on in each apt. Now, it’s good enough for me just to get an idea of what’s going on and since I’m not a member I don’t really care to see the action much at all. I do still have an interest in what happens in general. Anyways, this is kind of where having too many apts lead me. It pushed me out the door. 

The other part of my question is this. Would CC be better if there were only say 10 apts online at a time? I think I get a lot of flack for ruining the fun around here, but I wonder if the sheer number of apts has more to do with it. Simply because no one can know everything that’s going on it causes people to just snipe caps or comments here and there throughout the day. 

To be honest i can't be bothered to flick on many of them as just get pissed off going from one to another and then room to room finding them and then you get that spinning circle and then i say fuck it and bugger off completely lol.

Perhaps if they had more features like RLC (oops sorry,dirty word lol) like movement sensors and be able to open 4 screens at a time on your main monitor it would cut down the wasted time looking around and finding fuckall happening.

Though what i used to find on RLC was that all the fucking pets started triggering off the movement sensors lol but it was a big help in finding people i must admit.

In the end i just settle for following a few of my favourite ones and say bugger the rest unless CC suddenly advises you of some action then i look on the timeline otherise you could spend all fucking day hunting out stuff and then still ending up with fuckall.

Ok rant over Amy.

[Kkru394]

I think 15 would be best. With 1 screen view 30 is too hard to keep up with

I’d keep NinaAS.LexyPLG, M&H, R&P, F&K, O&L, S&S , NRCM , combine Anastasia and Misty, Combine C&A and C&S,  combine Patrik,Blair,Ben,Whitney, A&G, G&J and V&K although they could be leaving. That leaves room for Miami.

[ze81]

10,15 it's to little..if other cam sites have twenty something houses and they work ok then VHTV could perfectly have Lets say 20 good houses,some houses right now in VH are just open to have one,two events a day and then paces are empty for long long periods,some houses are empty almost every weekend,twenty active houses would be enought and delivers with good stream quality.But things are going opposite way...Jeka opening more and more cam girls show houses,another couple managers trying to open as much places as humanly possible(who cares about quality...)and VH losing little by little quality.

[fasterboss]

I do not know the ideal number, but if I start clicking on each apartment from the beginning, then I get to the middle and I'm already tired,

I just watch my favorites that are not more than 10, and also liked that it was possible to sign only the apartments I want to see,

  this would be a good measure of vhtv

[ze81]

On 6/16/2018 at 6:05 PM, Amy3 said:

Do you think VHTV would be a better experience if they capped the number of apts online to say 10? 

I know that when I was watching I had to know everything. Because of the number of apts that became an impossible task and it really did cause me to lose interest in what was going on in each apt. Now, it’s good enough for me just to get an idea of what’s going on and since I’m not a member I don’t really care to see the action much at all. I do still have an interest in what happens in general. Anyways, this is kind of where having too many apts lead me. It pushed me out the door. 

The other part of my question is this. Would CC be better if there were only say 10 apts online at a time? I think I get a lot of flack for ruining the fun around here, but I wonder if the sheer number of apts has more to do with it. Simply because no one can know everything that’s going on it causes people to just snipe caps or comments here and there throughout the day. 

Good post.you should had make an poll in it also.

[ze81]

My response.Absoluty yes.This is just my personal use..first ten houses in list..I watch basicaly only Ary&George,zack&blonde and Sasha&alice&spartack.Second part of list i watch mostly..an little amy&jane,same Dana&clay,a&l&p,Ruby,H&M,Kira also an little and Nina&alan.So basicaly at max an dozen houses with regularity,and at least other dozen i barely watch,only when zapping And preview thumbs.Think fifteen,twenty at max places with good quality,cams,residents and guests would be great.

[zoifan]

On 6/16/2018 at 1:05 PM, Amy3 said:

Do you think VHTV would be a better experience if they capped the number of apts online to say 10? 

I know that when I was watching I had to know everything. Because of the number of apts that became an impossible task and it really did cause me to lose interest in what was going on in each apt. Now, it’s good enough for me just to get an idea of what’s going on and since I’m not a member I don’t really care to see the action much at all. I do still have an interest in what happens in general. Anyways, this is kind of where having too many apts lead me. It pushed me out the door. 

The other part of my question is this. Would CC be better if there were only say 10 apts online at a time? I think I get a lot of flack for ruining the fun around here, but I wonder if the sheer number of apts has more to do with it. Simply because no one can know everything that’s going on it causes people to just snipe caps or comments here and there throughout the day. 

 

I respectfully disagree with the question as phrased. It is misleading. 

 

As a subscriber who pays hard earned money for a premium subscription , I prefer more apartments - of course. 

HOWEVER, I do have a problem with non-sense apartments. VH strategy to add fluff apartments is not a good deed.  

Also, I do not appreciate apartments   whom main focus is cam shows and use VH as extra cash. That is bull shit. 

 

 

 

[Sparkles]

6 minutes ago, zoifan said:

 

I respectfully disagree with the question as phrased. It is misleading. 

 

As a subscriber who pays hard earned money for a premium subscription , I prefer more apartments - of course. 

HOWEVER, I do have a problem with non-sense apartments. VH strategy to add fluff apartments is not a good deed.  

Also, I do not appreciate apartments   whom main focus is cam shows and use VH as extra cash. That is bull shit. 

 

 

 

Agree also like at least Cleo&Axel, Sina&Jules, Alan&Nina, Clara&Stas are bs.. it's all about cam shows and directing porno movies on cam 
But the chaturbate houses is great for VH.. they brought subscribers and free advertisement to vh on one of the majors cam sites

[jabbath1987]

Well first I thought yes if course but then I thought further and now I would tend to say no. Imagine what will happen when let's say every manager is allowed to have at max 10 places. The competition would be incredible and the voyeur aspect would be totally gone. Imagine the manager finds people who he thinks will bring him more money than his present people. Instead of adding a new place he will simply fire the ones who earn the least for him. So an incredible competition will arise because absolutely nobody of course wants to be on the "hot seat" I think that would be worse than having more places. 

[Sparkles]

3 minutes ago, jabbath1987 said:

Well first I thought yes if course but then I thought further and now I would tend to say no. Imagine what will happen when let's say every manager is allowed to have at max 10 places. The competition would be incredible and the voyeur aspect would be totally gone. Imagine the manager finds people who he thinks will bring him more money than his present people. Instead of adding a new place he will simply fire the ones who earn the least for him. So an incredible competition will arise because absolutely nobody of course wants to be on the "hot seat" I think that would be worse than having more places. 

That's happening already..
And just imagine Alex&Lina having even more houses.. or jeka with more cam houses or george with more pro porno houses.. Like that  also the voyeur aspect is totally gone. 

[jabbath1987]

Just now, Sparkles said:

That's happening already..
And just imagine Alex&Lina having even more houses.. or jeka with more cam houses or george with more pro porno houses.. Like that  also the voyeur aspect is totally gone. 

But it will be worse. Even the normal voyeur places would no longer stand a chance.