nack Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 As long as the guys keep on bringing different girls and fucking them, the apartment is good.A hint of swing and I am in. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robwin Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 1 hour ago, Amy3 said: It’s interesting cause to a point the subscriber is paying for a raw view through the cams, but it seems that what they are actually paying for is the type of content they want to see more of through the cams. With every view, the subscriber is voting for that type of content. Surely, the tenants and the site owners are compelled to follow the viewing demands of the viewer. Call me crazy, but I think the viewers want to see sex, lots and lots of sex of all kinds. 😂🤣😂 Well everyone is right or wrong depending on their point of view i suppose and yes, you get what you pay for, whether its always what you want is up for debate as so many want different things and scenarios. Also what you see is actually happening so even if much of it is put on its still real life as its actually happening so everyone is happy eh one way or the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy3 Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 9 minutes ago, Robwin said: Well everyone is right or wrong depending on their point of view i suppose and yes, you get what you pay for, whether its always what you want is up for debate as so many want different things and scenarios. Also what you see is actually happening so even if much of it is put on its still real life as its actually happening so everyone is happy eh one way or the other. Not what you want, what the collective wants. It’s like a bell curve, there are slow apts and fast apts, the wave is always pushing towards the faster apts. Clearly the oversexed apts are getting more views. The taste of money is enticing. There are clearly rules in place. For me, I don’t really care if the system is fair or not anymore. It is what it is and I am not trying to tell them what to do. Just explaining it how I see it. As I see VHTV now, I tend to agree that it shouldn’t matter if the apt is a fuckpad or a camming pit stop or whatever a tenant wants it to be. Maybe someone wants to set up a woodworking shop so people can watch a guy sculpt furniture all day. The viewers can decide what’s worth watching and what isn’t. Let VHTV sort out the rest themselves. Curious if you guys think VHTV should enforce a minimum daily, weekly, or monthly earning rate? That is, an apt has to earn a certain amount of views in a day, week, month, what have you or be dismissed from the site? If not, could you live with a hundred Gia and Anthony type apts? A some point surely the money in the big pot starts to deflate and even decent, but fairly low earning apts start to reconsider if it’s worth it. I suppose growth can solve that problem, but to what extent is that feasible, I don’t know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewinner Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 2 hours ago, Robwin said: Basically the majority of apartments now are just premises to import people who will perform sex acts at the click of your fingers, or is it the click of a mouse. I was reading comments on Alan's apartment earlier and the main concern seemed to be whether the young lady would perform anal etc. Have we really stooped to this level of requirement? Seems rather a sad situation really. watching people who live their lives like the rest of us and act within social norms is not so interesting to most viewers. In fact, the attraction of these sites are, the models (or whatever you call them) can act on what most people can only fantasise about . so it is not strange if viewers get excited about certain sexual activities and speculate on what might or might not happen. Actually, this is the biggest difference between watching real people as oppose to watching porn, the fact that you don't know what happens next, and what people you are watching are capable of. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkles Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 12 minutes ago, Amy3 said: Curious if you guys think VHTV should enforce a minimum daily, weekly, or monthly earning rate? That is, an apt has to earn a certain amount of views in a day, week, month, what have you or be dismissed from the site? If not, could you live with a hundred Gia and Anthony type apts? A some point surely the money in the big pot starts to deflate and even decent, but fairly low earning apts start to reconsider if it’s worth it. I suppose growth can solve that problem, but to what extent is that feasible, I don’t know. Totally not.. If yes, could you live with a hundred of Matilda type apts? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robwin Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 17 minutes ago, Sparkles said: Totally not.. If yes, could you live with a hundred of Matilda type apts? If yes why the fuck would you pay to watch them on VH? Just log onto Chaturbate and watch it all for free loool. In the end to discuss who is right or wrong on here is pointless as people will either pay to watch VH or they will not. You can argue the rights and wrongs till the cows come home, it just won't make any difference, as long as VH are making money tennants will come and tennants will go and managers will manage, well in theory they do lool. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkles Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 6 minutes ago, Robwin said: If yes why the fuck would you pay to watch them on VH? Just log onto Chaturbate and watch it all for free loool. In the end to discuss who is right or wrong on here is pointless as people will either pay to watch VH or they will not. You can argue the rights and wrongs till the cows come home, it just won't make any difference, as long as VH are making money tennants will come and tennants will go and managers will manage, well in theory they do lool. Was just to answer on the same "coin" to Amy that used 😁 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robwin Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 3 minutes ago, Sparkles said: Was just to answer on the same "coin" to Amy that used 😁 And probably get better views without the need for binoculars 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy3 Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 45 minutes ago, Sparkles said: Totally not.. If yes, could you live with a hundred of Matilda type apts? Yep, cause I don’t pay for any of it. I do think if there were a hundred Matilda apts and one D&D apt, the Matilda apts would soon close on their own volition. I do have to wonder if having so many rather slow apts eventually hurts the profitability of all tenants. There has to be some breaking point for the mid to low earning tenants. I guess since most are managed, that as soon as the tenants can’t pay the bills with earnings it’s go time. Maybe I’m just surprised some of these people have managed to stay longer then I expected. I do wonder how much the managers have carried slow tenants hoping for a better future only to lose their ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zone51 Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 colin the tourist is here 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
budda Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
budda Posted March 9, 2019 Share Posted March 9, 2019 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts