groomy Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 4 minutes ago, Dlinhagen said: One camera didn't just fell. The girl saw an oportunitty when Big Dick left the bedroom and intentionaly push the three cameras up all she could. The one standing in position was because she couldn't move it. This apt. already had an issue when Big Dick cover the bathroom cam (I don't remember if one or two times). So no warning necessary this time. I know it sucks for us, subscribers, but tennants and guests should respect the cameras above all. OK. But in the preview bar, everything was calm. So - ok, then there will be -some $ for A&K.😉 But we most likely we’ll lose it action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldi Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 complete waste of time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkles Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 10 minutes ago, Dlinhagen said: One camera didn't just fell. The girl saw an oportunitty when Big Dick left the bedroom and intentionaly push the three cameras up all she could. The one standing in position was because she couldn't move it. This apt. already had an issue when Big Dick covered the bathroom cam (I don't remember if one or two times). So no warning necessary this time. I know it sucks for us, subscribers, but tennants and guests should respect the cameras above all. Also, if and apt. like S&P or the porn house is punished for not taking care of the cameras, I'll think it's ok too. Exaclty, and i guess all that is taken in consideration and probablty it's worse when the action are done on purpose and repeatedly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dlinhagen Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 1 minute ago, Sparkles said: Exaclty, and i guess all that is taken in consideration and probablty it's worse when the action are done on purpose and repeatedly Although this time was a guest...but I read somewhere guest and tennants should be considered equals. I have a proposition for a Camshow Rule: - When an apt is doing a Camshow, put the apt offline during the show (with a banner saying "Cam show"),so you can go to the camshow place and watch the show. This way they won't earn money from us, and the non-cam apts will earn more money. I think that the two apts which only do camshows are cheating and going against the spirit of the project. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkles Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 4 minutes ago, Dlinhagen said: Although this time was a guest...but I read somewhere guest and tennants should be considered equals. I have a proposition for a Camshow Rule: - When an apt is doing a Camshow, put the apt offline during the show (with a banner saying "Cam show"),so you can go to the camshow place and watch the show. This way they won't earn money from us, and the non-cam apts will earn more money. I think that the two apts which only do camshows are cheating and going against the spirit of the project. Agree with being considered equal since tenants are responsible for telling them that.. But in this case the guy is a guest also. I would say put it offline, but during that period moving all cams to "free" 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dlinhagen Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 2 minutes ago, Sparkles said: Agree with being considered equal since tenants are responsible for telling them that.. But in this case the guy is a guest also. I would say put it offline, but during that period moving all cams to "free" YES, I like your idea better. If you're doing a camshow, cameras are free so you earn zero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
groomy Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 23 minutes ago, Sparkles said: Exaclty, and i guess all that is taken in consideration and probablty it's worse when the action are done on purpose and repeatedly Well it is complex. For me - I see girl only at beginning and thought that if something happens, it will be around after hours "~now" in time. Other - guests Nikki - have highly intelligent conversation. In general, I paused and switched to another tabs. After - I see on CC action and apt offline. In preview sheet - everything was fine, just one camera was rotated ~40 degrees. Therefore, my dissatisfaction. For first time in two weeks - there was some interesting action and it was turned off. However, this will be repeated. Any guys apartment will have problems with cameras. Or they will play games 24/7 - do nothing. Girls - have more advantages, but there are also no guarantees. Swing couple - depends on couples. It seems that someone have problems when guests simply go to bathtub and started illegal drug work. That is, any guests are a risk. So - this go to vanilla parties with other tenants where there is no any risks. D&D/I&B/L&B/C&S/M&S + Condor+ some trusted friends. But here there are problems. Remember one of Condor’s girls - who was with boys in Leonie apt. This apartment is terrible in number of frightening cameras. It`s ok for regular couple or group participants. But not for inviting new girls/guys/couples. Or inviting girls - as last time, which immediately agreed to a casting in Dom2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squish Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 52 minutes ago, groomy said: Well, the law should be one for all. Otherwise it will classical - "Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi". Impressed groomy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldi Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 2 minutes ago, groomy said: there was some interesting action and it was turned off. how about to switch off the whole vhtv? they wouldn't have to take any risk in the future at all 😂🤣 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miscvoyeur Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 7 minutes ago, groomy said: Remember one of Condor’s girls - who was with boys in Leonie apt. When was this and what happened? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
groomy Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 6 minutes ago, miscvoyeur said: When was this and what happened? Here. Well, as far as I heard later, this accidentally happened. They just confused. And they could not quickly convey that there are problems. They expected to good earn. It turned out that they earned in "-". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkles Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 4 minutes ago, groomy said: Well it is complex. For me - I see girl only at beginning and thought that if something happens, it will be around now in time. Other - guests Nikki - have highly intelligent conversation. In general, I paused and switched to another tabs. After - I see on CC action and apt offline. In preview sheet - everything was fine, just one camera was rotated ~40 degrees. Therefore, my dissatisfaction. For first time in two weeks - there was some interesting action and it was turned off. If i'm not wrong they had (probably also finished the last one, two i know they have) three rounds before offline 6 minutes ago, groomy said: However, this will be repeated. Any guys apartment will have problems with cameras. Or they will play games 24/7 - do nothing. Girls - have more advantages, but there are also no guarantees. Swing couple - depends on couples. It seems that someone have problems when guests simply go to bathtub and started illegal drug work. That is, any guests are a risk. So - this go to vanilla parties with other tenants where there is no any risks. D&D/I&B/L&B/C&S/M&S + Condor+ some trusted friends. But here there are problems. Remember one of Condor’s girls - who was with boys in Leonie apt. This apartment is terrible in number of frightening cameras. It`s ok for regular couple or group participants. But not for inviting new girls/guys/couples. Or inviting girls - as last time, which immediately agreed to a casting in Dom2. What i don't understand is that large dozens of people already visited without touching the cams.. The problems isn't exclusively on guys apartments. I guess the rules are the same since beginning and even at anna&alex places there was problems (if not mistaken on first apartment) and if there was something that apartment never was a vanilla apartment. Lots of other apartments with different people visiting also doesn't have more then once in a short time (like this one) so many problems with cams covering I don't see any particular difference in this apartment considering the cams.. all of them have the cams clearly visible, now if the tenants lie about the purpose of them they totally should be fine about that. You have as examples from same manager Beverley&Hugo, Kira, Alan&Serena, Kali places that even have old cams and tripods and you see/saw regularly different people there having sex. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts