letsdothis Posted July 21, 2020 Author Share Posted July 21, 2020 2 hours ago, Ridgerunner said: And you're saying you've seen those biological differences in Trump's brain? Spin, deflect, misinform, misdirect, fantasize, make shit up out of thin air, that's all you can do. Where did I say I'd seen the psychopath's brain? Where did I even imply I'd seen the psychopath's brain? Why would I ever want to see the psychopath's brain, even if you could find it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgerunner Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 9 hours ago, letsdothis said: Spin, deflect, misinform, misdirect, fantasize, make shit up out of thin air, that's all you can do. Where did I say I'd seen the psychopath's brain? Where did I even imply I'd seen the psychopath's brain? Why would I ever want to see the psychopath's brain, even if you could find it? You're the one who said Trump was a psychopath and then brought up all the physical manifestations in the brain of a psychopath. You are the one who is fantasizing, misdirecting, spinning, and misinforming people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
letsdothis Posted July 21, 2020 Author Share Posted July 21, 2020 6 hours ago, Ridgerunner said: You're the one who said Trump was a psychopath and then brought up all the physical manifestations in the brain of a psychopath. You are the one who is fantasizing, misdirecting, spinning, and misinforming people. You need to go back and read the post I quoted, instead of taking everything I said out of context. Stone said the reason for the psychopath's behavior was due to his lack of discipline during his younger years, that he was taught that everyone was supposed to kiss his ass. In other words, his psychopathic behavior was bred into him. My reply first explained why, even though it wasn't my idea, I and others call him the psychopath in chief. Then, also in response to what Stone said about his behavior being bred, I simply excerpted an article about a new study being conducted in the UK on psychopaths. This study found new evidence that psychopaths are born with a physical abnormality in their brains that causes their abhorrent and criminal behavior. Nowhere, did I say it had anything to do with your psychopath in chief. Neither I nor the article referred to the psychopath in chief in any way. My entire reply was in response to what Stone had said about bred behavior traits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgerunner Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 9 minutes ago, letsdothis said: You need to go back and read the post I quoted, instead of taking everything I said out of context. Stone said the reason for the psychopath's behavior was due to his lack of discipline during his younger years, that he was taught that everyone was supposed to kiss his ass. In other words, his psychopathic behavior was bred into him. My reply first explained why, even though it wasn't my idea, I and others call him the psychopath in chief. Then, also in response to what Stone said about his behavior being bred, I simply excerpted an article about a new study being conducted in the UK on psychopaths. This study found new evidence that psychopaths are born with a physical abnormality in their brains that causes their abhorrent and criminal behavior. Nowhere, did I say it had anything to do with your psychopath in chief. Neither I nor the article referred to the psychopath in chief in any way. My entire reply was in response to what Stone had said about bred behavior traits. Spare me and tell that to someone who is naive enough to believe you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgerunner Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 The CDC is now saying that that the infection rate in certain parts of the U.S. was two to thirteen times higher than reported. So that means the death rate was two to thirteen times lower than reported. But will the CDC ever tell people that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happyone Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 5 minutes ago, Ridgerunner said: The CDC is now saying that that the infection rate in certain parts of the U.S. was two to thirteen times higher than reported. So that means the death rate was two to thirteen times lower than reported. But will the CDC ever tell people that? I think that the infection rate reporting may be inaccurate, however, does not mean that the death rate will necessarily decrease by the same percentage as they are separately reported. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nagachilli2 Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 12 minutes ago, happyone said: I think that the infection rate reporting may be inaccurate, however, does not mean that the death rate will necessarily decrease by the same percentage as they are separately reported. I think, at the end of the day, when we've finished calculating Leora's bates on that super duper abacus, they can use it to work out all the Covid figures and statistics around the world...😏 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgerunner Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 18 minutes ago, happyone said: I think that the infection rate reporting may be inaccurate, however, does not mean that the death rate will necessarily decrease by the same percentage as they are separately reported. Death rates will decrease by the same rate as the infection rate increases in the areas where the infection rates are increased. 10 deaths / 100 infections = .1 death rate, 10 deaths/1300 infections = .0076923 death rate. .0076923 x 13 =.099999999 or .1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happyone Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 50 minutes ago, Ridgerunner said: The CDC is now saying that that the infection rate in certain parts of the U.S. was two to thirteen times higher than reported. So that means the death rate was two to thirteen times lower than reported. But will the CDC ever tell people that? OK , so why would you want a higher infection rate than reported??? More people would be scared because more infections means higher chance of them becoming infected---most do not look at the death rates-only the number of deaths. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nagachilli2 Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 40 minutes ago, Ridgerunner said: Death rates will decrease by the same rate as the infection rate increases in the areas where the infection rates are increased. 10 deaths / 100 infections = .1 death rate, 10 deaths/1300 infections = .0076923 death rate. .0076923 x 13 =.099999999 or .1 Give it a rest Ridge...They'll work all this out in a coupla years time...😏 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nagachilli2 Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 5 minutes ago, nagachilli2 said: Give it a rest Ridge...They'll work all this out in a coupla years time...😏 You can borrow Leora's abacus when she's finished with it... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgerunner Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 3 hours ago, happyone said: OK , so why would you want a higher infection rate than reported??? More people would be scared because more infections means higher chance of them becoming infected---most do not look at the death rates-only the number of deaths. Who said I wanted a higher infection rate? I'm just stating facts. If what the CDC says is true, than that means the virus may not be as deadly as we feared it was. Would that not be a good thing? That would also mean that many of the people who were infected showed no serious symptoms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts