O_U812 Posted April 9, 2021 Share Posted April 9, 2021 1 hour ago, Ridgerunner said: Who defines irresponsible? 1 hour ago, Ridgerunner said: Who defines irresponsible? Not you, that's for sure. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O_U812 Posted April 9, 2021 Share Posted April 9, 2021 50 minutes ago, Ridgerunner said: Putin invaded Ukraine and annexed Crimea when Obama was president and now it appears that Putin is about to stir up more shit in Ukraine now that Joe Biden is president. And.....? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O_U812 Posted April 9, 2021 Share Posted April 9, 2021 1 hour ago, Ridgerunner said: Has anyone from the DOJ or FBI publicly stated that? Now would you shut the fuck up about it? https://www.npr.org/2021/04/04/984203784/justice-department-investigating-rep-matt-gaetz-over-federal-sex-trafficking-law 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O_U812 Posted April 9, 2021 Share Posted April 9, 2021 3 hours ago, Ridgerunner said: Nothing was announced by the FBI nor DOJ about a criminal investigation of Matt Gaetz. Story was based upon anonymous sources by the New York Times. You continuously make a horse's ass out of yourself. Damn. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgerunner Posted April 9, 2021 Share Posted April 9, 2021 12 minutes ago, O_U812 said: Now would you shut the fuck up about it? https://www.npr.org/2021/04/04/984203784/justice-department-investigating-rep-matt-gaetz-over-federal-sex-trafficking-law NPR story is based upon an interview with New York Times reporter. That reporter used anonymous sources for her story. There still has been no public confirmation by anyone in the DOJ nor FBI that Matt Gaetz is being criminally investigated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O_U812 Posted April 9, 2021 Share Posted April 9, 2021 2 minutes ago, Ridgerunner said: NPR story is based upon an interview with New York Times reporter. That reporter used anonymous sources for her story. There still has been no public confirmation by anyone in the DOJ nor FBI that Matt Gaetz is being criminally investigated. You know what? Fuck you then Napoleon. You want to know for 100% certainty, then go talk to Merrick Garland. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgerunner Posted April 9, 2021 Share Posted April 9, 2021 Just now, O_U812 said: You know what? Fuck you then Napoleon. You want to know for 100% certainty, then go talk to Merrick Garland. Yep, that's what I want. A DOJ or FBI official with a name who states publicly that Matt Gaetz is the target of a criminal investigation. Then I will conclusively believe that Matt Gaetz is being investigated for a crime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgerunner Posted April 9, 2021 Share Posted April 9, 2021 5 minutes ago, O_U812 said: You know what? Fuck you then Napoleon. You want to know for 100% certainty, then go talk to Merrick Garland. And Merrick Garland would tell me that the DOJ nor FBI are not allowed to talk about active investigations. That's why the NYT reporter never gives the name of anyone she spoke to in the DOJ or FBI. So did she actually talk to anyone in the DOJ or FBI? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StnCld316 Posted April 9, 2021 Share Posted April 9, 2021 7 minutes ago, Ridgerunner said: Then I will conclusively believe that Matt Gaetz is being investigated for a crime. Just another pedophile being exposed. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPYING 1 Posted April 9, 2021 Share Posted April 9, 2021 What about hunter biden with all those pictures in his laptop, also how can a known crack head & meth addict was able to buy & own a gun 🔫 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgerunner Posted April 9, 2021 Share Posted April 9, 2021 1 minute ago, StnCld316 said: Just another pedophile being exposed. Maybe. Or maybe someone is just trying to smear him in hopes that he will resign. How about waiting for all the facts to be publicly revealed before jumping to conclusions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StnCld316 Posted April 9, 2021 Share Posted April 9, 2021 14 minutes ago, Ridgerunner said: Maybe. Or maybe someone is just trying to smear him in hopes that he will resign. How about waiting for all the facts to be publicly revealed before jumping to conclusions? It's been investigated so the facts will be out in due time whenever that may be. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts