Jump to content

Nude House (2021) Part #1


Recommended Posts

  • StnCld316 changed the title to Nude house (2021) Part #1
  • StnCld316 pinned this topic
On 10/20/2021 at 1:44 AM, fredrik29 said:

Lol what a joke of a place, they might as well call it trannie and gay-house, all i see tonight is the tranny that been in several apartments before and 2 of the blond guys that looks supergay and another guy.

That's because that is what it is moron! There are plenty of other apartments for straight viewers. Quit your bitching and watch something else!

It's blatantly obvious you're a homophobe and you think gay/bisexual viewers shouldn't have an apartment to watch.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, broxman said:

That's because that is what it is moron! There are plenty of other apartments for straight viewers. Quit your bitching and watch something else!

It's blatantly obvious you're a homophobic and you think gay / bisexual viewers shouldn't have an apartment to watch.

You represent the deviant 2% of the population. That is 1 in 50. There are not even 50 apartments in VH and yet you have the cheek to assume an entitlement to a voyeur site even though you would (presumably) have noticed that it wasn't a poof site when you first viewed it. I also resent your use of insulting labels on a friendly site. You are a vocal minority but no one is listening. VH experimented with a poof site but it just fizzled out. Perhaps you could form one of you own?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, squish said:

You represent the deviant 2% of the population. That is 1 in 50. There are not even 50 apartments in VH and yet you have the cheek to assume an entitlement to a voyeur site even though you would (presumably) have noticed that it wasn't a poof site when you first viewed it. I also resent your use of insulting labels on a friendly site. You are a vocal minority but no one is listening. VH experimented with a poof site but it just fizzled out. Perhaps you could form one of you own?

Hey, Squish. I am as heterosexual as the day is long, but I respect everyone's right to choose their own sexual orientation, 100%, which, BTW, is a bit higher than 2%. UCLA compiled 11 large-population surveys and found the average US percentage of homosexuals to be 3.5%. Wikipedia says it averages 3.8%, with a high of 5.7% in Maryland (DC had an average of 8.6%, but they obviously have a smaller overall population.) They may be a minority, but plenty of people are listening. Unfortunately, the LGBTQ community does seem to get the short end of the stick more than their fair share of the time.

As for Broxman, "moron" would be considered an insult, but the guy was being a homophobe, without question. His use of the word "tranny" and saying someone "looks supergay (sp)" is being homophobic, and both those terms are considered insulting labels. Calling him a homophobe was right on point and that's not an insulting label. It's a recognized, legitimate description of someone who dislikes homosexuals. 

If he doesn't like homosexuals, that's fine—for him. But, maybe he should take Broxman's advice and watch apartments he does like and stop bitching about this one. And, your use of the phrase, "poof site" and calling someone a "deviant" because of their sexual orientation are also considered insulting labels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...