golfer06 Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 just curious @Voyeur House TV. but were alex & lina directly to blame or was it the sub-managers that they hired? and if it was alex/lina directly how does that affect zoi & tim apt? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedbear Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 6 minutes ago, stanley said: @Voyeur House TV I presume that the new realm that is launching this week we still go ahead as planned and was not a compound related realm? I think the same and curious if it will be more an inclusion solo like Allan and Nina or some surprise in relation to the ones we have here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabbath1987 Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 6 minutes ago, golfer06 said: just curious @Voyeur House TV. but were alex & lina directly to blame or was it the sub-managers that they hired? and if it was alex/lina directly how does that affect zoi & tim apt? It was the sub managers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golfer06 Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 1 minute ago, jabbath1987 said: It was the sub managers. so no problem with z & t? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabbath1987 Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 36 minutes ago, groomy said: Voyeur House TV One moment please. It turns out they had been deceived twice. As far as I understand - Eric and Layla live more than 900km from the place. That is, they stayed in an absolutely alien city - without housing. And they are unlikely to be able to quickly go south to home - now the season. Places on the train should be booked for a couple of weeks. Lena and Peter - rented an apartment, but when they were told that the test period had passed, they stopped renting. That is - they too without housing (Lena can live in the campus, but since September). Katie and Phil - I do not know their situation. Rose - go to mother probably. They are off the site. So money does not earn. And those that are - they will have to spend on accommodation and food. No. They'd better live in two pairs. In a big apartment. For us. They are not shy of each other. Since September, Lena will spend a long time at the university. And when their two pairs - they are less lazy and do more. Pretty sure VH will help them with all the things now that they are fully aware of the situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabbath1987 Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 Just now, golfer06 said: so no problem with z & t? Nope everything alright there. AFAIK no sub managers there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanley Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 So 50% goes to the managers - in this case Alex & Lina. They then take their cut and pass the rest on to the sub-managers. The sub-managers then take their cut and pass the rest onto the tennants. After the 2 sets of managers took their slice of the pie, there was little left to split between the 10 tennants in the compound. There has been some discussion here as to whether the policy of having managers is the right approach, but I get the feeling that you are still going to continue down that route. However, I think you should seriously consider whether to prohibit having sub-managers and make it a rule that the managers (like Alex/Lina, Anna/Alex etc) must manage themselves and not hire others to do it for them. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabbath1987 Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 1 minute ago, stanley said: So 50% goes to the managers - in this case Alex & Lina. They then take their cut and pass the rest on to the sub-managers. The sub-managers then take their cut and pass the rest onto the tennants. After the 2 sets of managers took their slice of the pie, there was little left to split between the 10 tennants in the compound. There has been some discussion here as to whether the policy of having managers is the right approach, but I get the feeling that you are still going to continue down that route. However, I think you should seriously consider whether to prohibit having sub-managers and make it a rule that the managers (like Alex/Lina, Anna/Alex etc) must manage themselves and not hire others to do it for them. Yes no sub managers I would say. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nack Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 4 minutes ago, jabbath1987 said: Pretty sure VH will help them with all the things now that they are fully aware of the situation. Let us know. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maturin Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 1 minute ago, jabbath1987 said: Yes no sub managers I would say. If they even existed in the first place - it seems me that A&L always seem to have an excuse as to why they are not personally to blame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golfer06 Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 1 minute ago, jabbath1987 said: Yes no sub managers I would say. now we know how artur was paying for that car that rose & tory were washing! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthshay Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 I'm sorry but that's Bulshit. How could it be the sub mangers fault, they just hired employees. If you can't come to an agreement with them then fired them and get new ones or manage it yourself. The only one responsible here is alex/Lina. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.gif.e335e3b234713d678b8911e6eec69d7b.gif)
Recommended Posts