Voyeur-House.TV - Part 1

[ze81]

Just now, Amy3 said:

VH already learned their lesson about big houses with M and G. They don't work. No one want to deal with pecking through 15 cams in an apt. 

Well just new houses with new residents would be nice,and better cams.

[jabbath1987]

Movement detection bis crucial on a big house

[Rhdem]

have VH rise the prices??? now it's 44,95  dollars  for 30 days premium

[ze81]

Just now, Rhdem said:

have VH rise the prices??? now it's 44,95  dollars  for 30 days premium

Did you use an new account/mail to pay?If so Think only users with some long time/account in VH have the same prices as always,new ones have the price already up.

[golfer06]

Just now, Rhdem said:

have VH rise the prices??? now it's 44,95  dollars  for 30 days premium

if you don't have a break in service it won't go up. if you stop then pick it up again the price will rise. original members with continuous service are only paying $29.95.

[stanley]

Big houses with high quality cams are never likely to happen on VHTV whilst the policy is that the managers have to pay for the cams. We see now that managers install mostly poor quality cams and maybe a couple of high quality cams because they can't afford to buy any more.

[golfer06]

yes.

[ze81]

25 minutes ago, stanley said:

Big houses with high quality cams are never likely to happen on VHTV whilst the policy is that the managers have to pay for the cams. We see now that managers install mostly poor quality cams and maybe a couple of high quality cams because they can't afford to buy any more.

That's kinda the spirit of VH,that managers and residents have some freedom and to certain degree it's posite,but with that comes the "abuse" of managers etc..that's why we have such bad cams and position of the same in several houses(mainly layne one and Maria and grisha).In my personal opinon doesn't give an good image of site,I mean you have some houses with perfect fine cams etc then others are just bellow the minimal quality.

[jabbath1987]

Just now, ze81 said:

That's kinda the spirit of VH,that managers and residents have some freedom and to certain degree it's posite,but with that comes the "abuse" of managers etc..that's why we have such bad cams and position of the same in several houses(mainly layne one and Maria and grisha).In my personal opinon doesn't give an good image of site,I mean you have some houses with perfect fine cams etc then others are just bellow the minimal quality.

But Mika Layne and GM are their own managers.

[golfer06]

Just now, Amy3 said:

Anybody else getting an error message when you try to post an image in the forums?

looks like it's working now!

[ze81]

57 minutes ago, jabbath1987 said:

But Mika Layne and GM are their own managers.

Exactly,and look how their places are..it's nice VH give they freedom,but with that comes come abuse..like caring little to positioned cams,the qualitie of the same.Rlc have a lot bad things but seem they have an team or someone that manages it all,and the advantages of that..for exemple it's is almost all houses the cams have similar nice quality.

[jabbath1987]

16 hours ago, ze81 said:

Exactly,and look how their places are..it's nice VH give they freedom,but with that comes come abuse..like caring little to positioned cams,the qualitie of the same.Rlc have a lot bad things but seem they have an team or someone that manages it all,and the advantages of that..for exemple it's is almost all houses the cams have similar nice quality.

But RLC is a rather "fat" company where everything is centralized. This takes time for doing things and increases reaction time. VH has a decentralized model where you can react much faster to changes. The downside is for example cam quality not the same at each place. But the advantages are for more.