Jump to content

Catherine & John


Recommended Posts

that is true this is voyeur in it raw form, but who would pay almost $40 to watch any apt. with out the sexual  part of it or with out some drama even with out some sort of interesting activity, i think not many. that is why VH is a cam show site not a real  life site and that is why we pay to watch a show sexual or otherwise.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Amy3 said:

Exactly! They aren’t supposed to care about the viewers. That’s not voyeurism, that’s a performance. If you signed up to see real people live their real life on cam, why would you pay to see a performance?  

think I didn't explain that part good,I think they should care(at least something)about viewers,90% of the houses/residents I seen in VH they plan parties and other activities,it's an thing that think most users know and expected,at least in this site,other more Focused in the real life part(like Rlc)usual expect more day to day things most of time(in most houses not all),always remember the VH twitts..party tonight,residents expect visits,could be hot,that's one of th característics of site,maybe not so about real life but an mix,at least to me what's th point to watch an dude back playing games on computer..if I wanted am site mostly for rlc..i would watch rlc site.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The trick should be to pull off the appearance of real life as much as possible while at the same time putting on a good show. That the job description for a voyeur site cam worker. What we see now is straight up, preannounced, staged camstar porn shows by in large. Announcing guests and the promise of sex parties on Twitter defeats the idea of “the unexpected” and thus completely undercuts the notion of voyeurism. It removes all doubt that what you are seeing is in fact a cam show. VH tweets should only be the after view of what happend not the preview of events to come. 

Does this make any sense to any of you? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sat11 said:

that is true this is voyeur in it raw form, but who would pay almost $40 to watch any apt. with out the sexual  part of it or with out some drama even with out some sort of interesting activity, i think not many. that is why VH is a cam show site not a real  life site and that is why we pay to watch a show sexual or otherwise.

Exactly,There is an audience for that no doubt,but will that same audience join VH for that reason..VH it's diferent and that's good(in my opinon).Money doesn't grow on trees,and paying to watch an dude playing games seems worthless,even more when other site offers a lot more of that things and with better quality.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Amy3 said:

The trick should be to pull off the appearance of real life as much as possible while at the same time putting on a good show. That the job description for a voyeur site cam worker. What we see now is straight up, preannounced, staged camstar porn shows by in large. Announcing guests and the promise of sex parties on Twitter defeats the idea of “the unexpected” and thus completely undercuts the notion of voyeurism. It removes all doubt that what you are seeing is in fact a cam show. VH tweets should only be the after view of what happend not the preview of events to come. 

Does this make any sense to any of you? 

Amy..you are describing VH..more or less.There is other big cam site that offers almost the oposite of VH,it's nice two have to big diferent sites with a lot diferent delivery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sat11 said:

that is true this is voyeur in it raw form, but who would pay almost $40 to watch any apt. with out the sexual  part of it or with out some drama even with out some sort of interesting activity, i think not many. that is why VH is a cam show site not a real  life site and that is why we pay to watch a show sexual or otherwise.

You’re right very few people would. But then again look at what RLC created and compare their numbers to VH. I’d say that there is an audience for real voyeurism. Well, none of it is real in that sense, but the idea that it’s what I said, an attempt to make it look as real as possible. 

So, when I say that VH chose greed over the soul of their site, this is what I mean. Rather then slowly building a legitimate voyeur site based on the idea of individual tenants connected to their wheel, they allowed managers to create Frankenstein.  

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ze81 said:

Amy..you are describing VH..more or less.There is other big cam site that offers almost the oposite of VH,it's nice two have to big diferent sites with a lot diferent delivery.

No. I’m not! Voyeurism is incompatible with the idea of preannounced activity via Twitter. The Twitter announcements remove all doubt that what you are seeing is a staged cam show mainly designed for purpose of making money. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Amy3 said:

No. I’m not! Voyeurism is incompatible with the idea of preannounced activity via Twitter. The Twitter announcements remove all doubt that what you are seeing is a staged cam show mainly designed for purpose of making money. 

For good an worst thats vh(or part of VH)probarby that more action,delivery,even more staged it's the reason many join VH and even changed from other sites to join VH.I agree should be an balance,but at least 50\50,not 90\10 like this house.You can always join that other site,no Twitter anouncements,more day to day activities.Agree with some balance in VH,but taking of Twitter news,all the parties,orgies,crazy stuff it's taking a lot of the VH identity.To me this house and two residents are all that VH isn't,don't cair if this their life,it doesn't delivery the best things of VH.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, ze81 said:

For good an worst thats vh(or part of VH)probarby that more action,delivery,even more staged it's the reason many join VH and even changed from other sites to join VH.I agree should be an balance,but at least 50\50,not 90\10 like this house.You can always join that other site,no Twitter anouncements,more day to day activities.Agree with some balance in VH,but taking of Twitter news,all the parties,orgies,crazy stuff it's taking a lot of the VH identity.To me this house and two residents are all that VH isn't,don't cair if this their life,it doesn't delivery the best things of VH.

I can dig what you’re saying! But, the balance has shifted significantly in favor of the clear cut cam show. I just wonder if that audience will one day wake up and realize that they are paying a lot of money to see amateur porn shows with the same actors day in and day out? At some point a pussy is just a pussy and sex is just sex. Burnout among the audience and especially among the talent is inevitable, among that group of viewers especially. That’s why there is a constant need for new people. The problem VH has is dealing with the end run once it comes to pass. Sure, it’s easy to say too bad business is business, but when you have  to say that to a pregnant lady it gets a little more tricky and one has to decide what kind of person they really are. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Amy3 said:

You’re right very few people would. But then again look at what RLC creates and compare their numbers to VH. I’d say that there is an audience for real voyeurism. Well, none of it is real in that sense, but the idea that it’s what I said, an attempt to make it look as real as possible. 

So, when I say that VH chose greed over the soul of their site, this is what I mean. Rather then slowly building a legitimate voyeur site based on the idea of individual tenants conedtes to their wheel, they allowed managers to create Frankenstein.  

 

Well Amy on this subject i have to admit i completely agree with you on every point.

I hate to admit it but even i am slowly getting a bit pissed off with whats being offered and what goes on on VH now and I am possibly thinking of packing in my subscription sooner rather than later.

So much is staged now its unbelievable and as you say they make no bones about it now and even advertise forthcoming events lol well how bloody real life is that? As i have said before at least some of them try and put the impression on that what you are seeing is actual reality but really it is not and it all revolves around money, then again i, suppose it always has and we have kidded ourselves that what we are watching is real.

As you infer Amy in your last post how many times can you watch a cock go into a pussy,particulary the same cock lol, as it's always the same unless you keep changing the people to keep the interest up otherwise after a while it does get very boring watching the same ones all the time do exactly the same things. Nice while it lasted eh lol.

Even Ary now on free cam lol, real life ha ha pull the other one.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ze81 said:

Well not gona comet more about this two,it's now an hot topic without any deserve for that,gona watch other houses that actually someone it's moving hehe.

It’s cool! Thanks for listening. I pretty much said everything I wanted to say about this. I’ll return the the topic at hand. Sorry to be annoying guys! But please consider what I said at least. Thx! ❤️

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...